New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Sigir Supplementary

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes inside a SIGIR paper's page budget versus the cited repository — SIGIR counts appendices inside the 9-page (full) and 4-page (short) limits with only…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Sigir Supplementary

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigir-supplementary -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills sigir-supplementary --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/SIGIR-Skills/skills/sigir-supplementary .claude/skills/sigir-supplementary && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
sigir-supplementary
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
712 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes inside a SIGIR paper's page budget versus the cited repository — SIGIR counts appendices inside the 9-page (full) and 4-page (short) limits with only…

  • Works in 6 steps: The comparison table that carries the… → The tuning-protocol paragraph (symmetric… → One ablation table that isolates the… → …
  • So overflow material must be re-homed into run files
  • SKILL.md covers The three-container model, What earns its place in the…, Compression before amputation and Repository-as-appendix…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Sigir Supplementary is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding what goes inside a SIGIR paper's page budget versus the cited repository — SIGIR counts appendices inside the 9-page (full) and 4-page (short) limits with only references free, so overflow material must be re-homed into run files, repository docs, or cut, without hiding review-critical evidence outside the paper.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • So overflow material must be re-homed into run files
  • Repository docs
  • Without hiding review-critical evidence outside the paper

Example prompts

  • “/sigir-supplementary”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. The comparison table that carries the main claim, with significance markers.
  2. The tuning-protocol paragraph (symmetric budgets, dev split) — its absence is a
  3. One ablation table that isolates the mechanism.
  4. The evaluation-setup block: collections, metrics with cutoffs, qrels versions.
  5. Error/qualitative analysis — one distilled example pattern, not a gallery.
  6. Efficiency numbers if the claim mentions cost, latency, or scale at all.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are latex).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Sigir Supplementary loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 88 tokens; SKILL.md has 712 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~88
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 712 words, ~1,600 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/sigir-supplementary/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
sigir-supplementary
description
Use when deciding what goes inside a SIGIR paper's page budget versus the cited repository — SIGIR counts appendices inside the 9-page (full) and 4-page (short) limits with only references free, so overflow material must be re-homed into run files, repository docs, or cut, without hiding review-critical evidence outside the paper.

SIGIR Supplementary

SIGIR has no appendix escape hatch. The 2025 full-paper wording (the clearest recent statement of the standing rule) caps papers at 9 pages including figures, tables, proofs, appendixes, and acknowledgments — everything except references; the 2026 pages restate the budgets as 9/4 pages excluding references. There is no separate supplementary upload in the NeurIPS sense on the verified track pages. Overflow therefore has exactly three destinations: compression, the cited repository, or the bin. This skill is the triage protocol.

The three-container model

ContainerWhat belongs thereWhat must never be there
Paper body (9 or 4 pp)Every claim a reviewer must verify to accept: method, main tables, significance results, tuning protocol summary, limitationsFiller related work, per-query dumps, prompt walls
References (free)Complete citations — never trimmed for spaceContent smuggled into bibnotes
Cited repositoryRun files, full configs, per-query analyses, extra collections, prompts, proofs of secondary lemmas, negative resultsAnything acceptance depends on

The governing rule: reviewers must be able to accept the paper without opening the repository. Track pages do not oblige reviewers to consult external material, so evidence that lives only in the repo is evidence that may not exist for review.

What earns its place in the budget

Rank candidate content by review-criticality, not by effort spent producing it:

  1. The comparison table that carries the main claim, with significance markers.
  2. The tuning-protocol paragraph (symmetric budgets, dev split) — its absence is a standing SIGIR objection.
  3. One ablation table that isolates the mechanism.
  4. The evaluation-setup block: collections, metrics with cutoffs, qrels versions.
  5. Error/qualitative analysis — one distilled example pattern, not a gallery.
  6. Efficiency numbers if the claim mentions cost, latency, or scale at all.

What loses its seat first: exhaustive metric grids (report the pre-registered ones; put the grid in the repo), second and third qualitative examples, restated definitions of standard metrics, and architecture recaps of well-known baselines.

Compression before amputation

latex
% Honest space wins that don't touch \vspace (which risks desk rejection):
% 1. Merge setup prose into the table caption.
\caption{nDCG@10 on \colA{} and \colB{}. Paired t-test vs BM25,
         Bonferroni-corrected; $\dagger$: $p<0.05$. 3 seeds, mean$\pm$sd.}
% 2. One combined results table with grouped columns beats three tables.
% 3. booktabs + \small in tables (allowed by class) before cutting content.
% 4. Inline enumerations for contribution lists; drop the roadmap paragraph.

Never buy space by deleting the significance-testing sentence, the seed count, or the collection versions — those cuts convert a space problem into a soundness objection, which is a worse trade at this venue than a missing extra ablation.

Repository-as-appendix discipline

If the paper says "details in the repository," the repository must behave like an appendix, not a junk drawer:

  • A PAPER_MAP.md that mirrors the paper's section numbering: "§5.2 ablation → eval/ablation_table.md + runs/ablate_*.trec."
  • Per-query result files for every table, so a skeptical reviewer can drill down.
  • The full hyperparameter grid with the selected cell marked.
  • Anonymized for double-blind tracks (fresh export, no usernames); the Resources track's single-anonymous regime is the exception, not the rule.

Cross-references must be one-directional: the paper points to the repo; the repo never contains claims absent from the paper (reviewers cannot credit them, and policy-wise unreviewed claims must not ride into the version of record later).

Show full SKILL.md (245 more words)Show less

Worked micro-triage

A full-paper draft sits at 10.5 pages against the 9-page budget. Candidate cuts:

  1. A 0.6-page per-query case-study gallery (three annotated examples) → keep one example that names the diagnosed pattern; the other two move to the repo with their run-file coordinates. (-0.4 pp)
  2. A 0.5-page secondary-metric grid (five metrics × four collections) → keep the two pre-committed metrics; grid to eval/full_grid.md. (-0.4 pp)
  3. A 0.4-page derivation of a variant loss → state the result, cite the repo notebook. (-0.35 pp)
  4. The tuning-protocol paragraph — never; it pre-answers the venue's most common fatal objection.
  5. Caption-merge the setup prose and drop the roadmap paragraph. (-0.35 pp)

Net: on budget, with zero soundness loss — every cut demoted redundancy or depth, not protocol.

Short papers: the 4-page special case

A short paper has no room for a supplementary strategy — it is the strategy. Standard shape that fits: one focused question, one main table, one analysis figure, setup compressed into captions, everything else in the repo. If the triage above still leaves review-critical content homeless, the work is a full paper submitted to the wrong track; re-route rather than compress soundness away.

Pre-submission checklist

  • Page count within budget with acknowledgments space reserved (camera-ready restores them inside the same budget unless the track says otherwise — 待核实).
  • No review-critical evidence lives only in the repository.
  • Repository PAPER_MAP matches the submitted section numbering.
  • References complete and untrimmed; no content in bibliography notes.
  • No spacing/margin/font tampering; only class-sanctioned sizes used.

Output format

text
[Budget state] <pages>/<limit> with acks reserve y/n
[Cut list] <content demoted to repo, in order>
[Kept-by-criticality] main table / tuning protocol / ablation / setup / analysis
[Repo appendix] PAPER_MAP present y/n; per-query files y/n; anonymized y/n
[Soundness guard] significance sentence, seeds, versions all still in-paper y/n
[Re-route flag] none / "this is a full paper in short clothing"

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in SIGIR-Skills/skills/sigir-supplementary of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Sigir Supplementary next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Sigir Supplementary compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Sigir Supplementary this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Detecting Insider Threat Behaviorsmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~897Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Performing Insider Threat Investigationmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Investigating Insider Threat Indicatorsmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Detecting Insider Threat With Uebamukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~738Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Detecting Insider Data Exfiltration Via Dlpmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~623Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Detecting Insider Threat Behaviors

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Detect insider threat behavioral indicators including unusual data access, off-hours activity, mass file downloads, privilege abuse, and resignation-correlated data theft.

    34k GitHub stars~897 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed

  • Performing Insider Threat Investigation

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Investigates insider threat incidents involving employees, contractors, or trusted partners who misuse authorized access to steal data, sabotage systems, or violate security policies, combining…

    34k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed

  • Investigating Insider Threat Indicators

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Investigates insider threat indicators including data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, policy violations, and pre-departure behaviors using SIEM analytics, DLP alerts, and HR…

    34k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed

  • Detecting Insider Threat With Ueba

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Implement User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) using Elasticsearch/OpenSearch to build behavioral baselines, calculate anomaly scores, perform peer group analysis, and alert on insider threat…

    34k GitHub stars~738 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed

  • Detecting Insider Data Exfiltration Via Dlp

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Detects insider data exfiltration by analyzing DLP policy violations, file access patterns, upload volume anomalies, and off-hours activity in endpoint and cloud logs.

    34k GitHub stars~623 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed

  • Soda Supplementary

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when organizing the back matter of a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) submission — there is no supplementary channel, so appendix architecture inside the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Sigir Supplementary

What does Sigir Supplementary do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding what goes inside a SIGIR paper's page budget versus the cited repository — SIGIR counts appendices inside the 9-page (full) and 4-page (short) limits with only…. Sigir Supplementary is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding what goes inside a SIGIR paper's page budget versus the cited repository — SIGIR counts appendices inside the 9-page (full) and 4-page (short) limits with only references free, so overflow material must be re-homed into run files, repository docs, or cut, without hiding review-critical evidence outside the paper.

When should I use Sigir Supplementary?

Sigir Supplementary fits situations like: so overflow material must be re-homed into run files; repository docs; without hiding review-critical evidence outside the paper.

How do I install Sigir Supplementary in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigir-supplementary -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (SIGIR-Skills/skills/sigir-supplementary in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/sigir-supplementary in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Sigir Supplementary in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigir-supplementary -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (SIGIR-Skills/skills/sigir-supplementary in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/sigir-supplementary in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Sigir Supplementary in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigir-supplementary -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/sigir-supplementary, .gemini/skills/sigir-supplementary, .github/skills/sigir-supplementary and .opencode/skills/sigir-supplementary in your project.

What does Sigir Supplementary need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Sigir Supplementary is instructions for the agent only.

Does Sigir Supplementary access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Sigir Supplementary safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Sigir Supplementary use?

Sigir Supplementary is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Sigir Supplementary use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Sigir Supplementary?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Sigir Supplementary: Detecting Insider Threat Behaviors (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars), Performing Insider Threat Investigation (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars), Investigating Insider Threat Indicators (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars) and Detecting Insider Threat With Ueba (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Sigir Supplementary?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.