Agent skill

Sensys Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available, Functional, Reproduced) to pursue, building a…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Sensys Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills sensys-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/SenSys-Skills/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
sensys-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
357 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available, Functional, Reproduced) to pursue, building a…

  • Packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available
  • SKILL.md covers Choose the badges deliberately, Build the hardware-optional…, Document the provenance the… and Smoke-run before you submit, plus 2 more sections
  • Calls python3
  • Reproduced) to pursue

What it does

Sensys Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available, Functional, Reproduced) to pursue, building a hardware-optional evaluation path for reviewers without your testbed, documenting energy and hardware provenance, and passing the smoke run that proves functionality.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available
  • Reproduced) to pursue
  • Building a hardware-optional evaluation path for reviewers without your testbed
  • Documenting energy and hardware provenance

Example prompts

  • “/sensys-artifact-evaluation”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python3

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Sensys Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 357 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~92
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 357 words, ~1,155 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
sensys-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available, Functional, Reproduced) to pursue, building a hardware-optional evaluation path for reviewers without your testbed, documenting energy and hardware provenance, and passing the smoke run that proves functionality.

SenSys Artifact Evaluation

SenSys awards three independent ACM badges through an Artifact Evaluation Committee: Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated — Functional, and Results Reproduced. They are independent — you may pursue one, two, or all three — and awarded badges are printed on the paper and recorded in the ACM DL. The hard part at SenSys is that your evidence is physical: an evaluator usually does not have your motes, your harvester, or your deployment, so the artifact must be built to be judged without them.

Choose the badges deliberately

BadgeBarHardest part at SenSys
Artifacts AvailableArtifact deposited in a permanent public archive with a DOIDeciding what firmware/traces you can legally and safely release
Artifacts Evaluated — FunctionalThe artifact runs and does what the paper saysGiving an evaluator without your hardware a way to reach "it runs"
Results ReproducedKey results re-obtained by the evaluatorReproducing hardware-measured energy/latency numbers off your testbed

Available is the cheapest and worth claiming almost always. Functional and Reproduced are where the hardware-optional path earns its keep.

Build the hardware-optional path first

Most AEC members will not have your testbed. Give them a graded way in:

text
Tier 0 — Available:   archived repo (DOI), firmware sources, traces, README.
Tier 1 — Bench/replay: recorded sensor + power traces the analysis re-runs on any laptop,
                       reproducing the paper's figures from stored data.
Tier 2 — Emulation:   a QEMU/renode-class emulator or a single dev board that reaches
                       "it runs" without the full deployment.
Tier 3 — Full HW:     scripts + BOM for an evaluator who does have the platform.

A trace-replay path is the single most valuable thing you can ship: it lets an evaluator reproduce your figures from your recorded energy and sensor data even if they cannot re-run the deployment. Document exactly which figures/tables the replay reproduces and which need hardware.

Show full SKILL.md (122 more words)Show less

Document the provenance the AEC cannot infer

text
artifact/
  README.md            # claims → which script/trace reproduces each figure/table
  firmware/            # sources + toolchain version + build flags
  traces/              # recorded power + sensor data behind each figure
  analysis/            # scripts that turn traces into the paper's plots
  hardware/            # BOM, board revision, wiring, instrument model + settings
  ENERGY.md            # instrument, sampling rate, integration boundaries
  GROUND_TRUTH.md      # how reference labels were obtained and their error
  LICENSE

The ENERGY.md and GROUND_TRUTH.md files are SenSys-specific: an evaluator reproducing a number needs the measurement method, not just the code (see sensys-reproducibility).

Smoke-run before you submit

Prove the package installs and runs from clean before an evaluator ever sees it:

bash
# Package hygiene (manifests, seeds, scripts) — see resources/code/README.md
python3 ../../../shared-resources/ml-conference-methods/code/check_repro_package.py ./artifact
# Then the SenSys-specific smoke: does the trace-replay reproduce a headline figure?
cd artifact/analysis && ./reproduce_fig4.sh   # should regenerate Fig. 4 from traces/, no hardware

If the replay does not regenerate a figure on a clean machine, no badge claim is safe yet.

Work with the AEC's iteration

The committee may ask for revisions and iterate with you. Respond fast and concretely: a missing dependency or an unclear step is a quick fix, and the AEC is trying to award the badge, not deny it. Keep the anonymity rules of the round if evaluation overlaps the review window.

Output format

text
[Badges]   which of the three you are pursuing, and why each is reachable
[HW-path]  the graded path (Available/Replay/Emulation/Full-HW) — which tiers exist
[Provenance] ENERGY.md + GROUND_TRUTH.md + firmware toolchain present? pass/gap
[Smoke]    does trace-replay reproduce a headline figure on a clean machine? Y/N
[Open]     the gap most likely to block Functional or Reproduced

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in SenSys-Skills/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Sensys Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Sensys Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Sensys Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Artifacts Buildernexu-io/open-design100k—~347Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Mobisys Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sigcomm Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Artifacts Builder

    nexu-io/open-design

    Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui).

    100k GitHub stars~347 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mobisys Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SIGCOMM paper's code, traces, topologies, and configuration for the artifact-evaluation committee — choosing ACM badges (Artifacts Available, Evaluated…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Mobicom Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiCom artifact for the evaluation committee — choosing among the three ACM badges as a calibration of what you can prove, building a hardware-optional…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Sensys Artifact Evaluation

What does Sensys Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available, Functional, Reproduced) to pursue, building a…. Sensys Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available, Functional, Reproduced) to pursue, building a hardware-optional evaluation path for reviewers without your testbed, documenting energy and hardware provenance, and passing the smoke run that proves functionality.

When should I use Sensys Artifact Evaluation?

Sensys Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: packaging a SenSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing which of the three ACM badges (Available; reproduced) to pursue; building a hardware-optional evaluation path for reviewers without your testbed; documenting energy and hardware provenance.

How do I install Sensys Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (SenSys-Skills/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Sensys Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (SenSys-Skills/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Sensys Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/sensys-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Sensys Artifact Evaluation need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Sensys Artifact Evaluation needs the command-line tools its instructions call (python3). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Sensys Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Sensys Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Sensys Artifact Evaluation use?

Sensys Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Sensys Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Sensys Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Sensys Artifact Evaluation: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Artifacts Builder (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Mobisys Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Sensys Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.