Agent skill

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

MITAuto-check passedDatabases

Install Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility .claude/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
529 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

  • Works in 4 steps: Double-code a defined share of studies… → Quantify agreement with the appropriate… → State conflict resolution (consensus,… → …
  • Settling coding reliability
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Why transparency IS the…, Reporting standards RER points… and Coding reliability: report it,…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Makes the review auditable and re-runnable; it does not run the substantive robustness analyses (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance) or design the exhibits (revedres-tables-figures).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Databases, covering Reproducible research and ORMs and data access. It works with Prisma. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Settling coding reliability
  • PRISMA/MARS reporting
  • A reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript

Example prompts

  • “/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Double-code a defined share of studies (or all), independently.
  2. Quantify agreement with the appropriate statistic — Cohen's/Fleiss' κ for categorical codes, ICC for continuous extractions — and report…
  3. State conflict resolution (consensus, third coder) and re-check after disagreements.
  4. Provide the codebook so a reader knows exactly what was coded and how.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 98 tokens; SKILL.md has 529 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~98
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 529 words, ~1,263 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility
description
Use when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Makes the review auditable and re-runnable; it does not run the substantive robustness analyses (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance) or design the exhibits (revedres-tables-figures).

Transparency & Reproducibility (revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility)

When to trigger

  • The analysis is done and you must make the review auditable and re-runnable
  • Coding reliability has not been quantified or reported
  • You have not decided what search files, codebook, data, or scripts to share
  • A reviewer is likely to ask "could someone reproduce this synthesis from what you report?"

Why transparency IS the contribution at RER

Because RER reviews are submitted and peer-reviewed (not invited), a reader cannot take the synthesis on the author's authority — they must be able to check it. The credibility of a systematic review or meta-analysis is exactly the credibility of its process documentation: the search, the screening, the coding, and the analysis must be reported so completely that an independent reader could, in principle, re-run them and land in the same place. This is not an appendix afterthought; it is the spine of the review's claim to be systematic.

Reporting standards RER points to

RER directs authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to specific reporting standards (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准):

  • PRISMA — the systematic-review/meta-analysis reporting checklist and flow diagram. Report against every applicable item; include the flow diagram (see revedres-tables-figures).
  • APA "Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology" (the JARS family, incl. MARS for meta-analyses) — RER's submission guidance cites the American Psychologist reporting-standards article. Use MARS to ensure the meta-analysis reports its eligibility, search, coding, effect-size metric, model, and heterogeneity/bias analyses completely.
  • PRISMA-P for the protocol (see revedres-proposal-and-commissioning); PROSPERO/OSF registration cited.

Coding reliability: report it, don't assert it

  1. Double-code a defined share of studies (or all), independently.
  2. Quantify agreement with the appropriate statistic — Cohen's/Fleiss' κ for categorical codes, ICC for continuous extractions — and report the value, not just "two coders agreed."
  3. State conflict resolution (consensus, third coder) and re-check after disagreements.
  4. Provide the codebook so a reader knows exactly what was coded and how.
Show full SKILL.md (224 more words)Show less

Open materials: make the synthesis re-runnable

  • Share the search artifacts: full strings per database, dates, and the screening decisions/PRISMA counts.
  • Share the coding dataset and codebook (de-identified as needed) on OSF or a repository, with a DOI.
  • Share the analysis code (R metafor/meta, Stata meta, or Python) so the pooled estimates, moderators, and bias diagnostics are reproducible from the shared data.
  • Distinguish preregistered from exploratory analyses, and flag/justify every deviation from the protocol.
  • Note: RER publishes no original empirical data of yours; the open-materials obligation is on the review's own search, coding, and synthesis — your reproducible contribution.

Checklist

  • PRISMA checklist + flow diagram completed (systematic/meta)
  • MARS / APA reporting standards walked for a meta-analysis
  • Protocol registration (PROSPERO/OSF) cited; deviations flagged and justified
  • Inter-coder reliability quantified (κ/ICC) and reported, not asserted
  • Codebook included; conflict-resolution procedure stated
  • Search strings, dates, and screening counts reported in full
  • Coding dataset + analysis code shared (OSF/repository, with DOI) where possible
  • Preregistered vs. exploratory analyses clearly distinguished

Anti-patterns

  • "Two coders agreed" with no κ/ICC value (unauditable reliability)
  • A meta-analysis whose model, weights, or effect-size metric a reader cannot reconstruct
  • Search strings paraphrased, not reported verbatim per database
  • Silent deviations from the registered protocol
  • Treating open materials as optional polish rather than the basis of the systematic claim
  • Sharing nothing because "it's only a review" — the review's own process is the data

Output format

【PRISMA】checklist + flow complete? Y/N
【MARS/JARS】meta-analysis reporting standards walked? Y/N
【Registration】PROSPERO/OSF cited; deviations flagged? Y/N
【Coder reliability】κ/ICC value reported = <value>; conflict resolution stated? Y/N
【Codebook】included? Y/N
【Search artifacts】strings + dates + screening counts reported in full? Y/N
【Open materials】dataset + code shared (DOI)? Y/N
【Preregistered vs exploratory】distinguished? Y/N
【Next step】→ revedres-editor-strategy (scope negotiation + reviewer expectations)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Method Writingaipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Review Methodologyjaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills3741 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassCC-BY-4.0
Methods Section Writeraipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Reporting Guideline Compliance Checkeraipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Make FiguresAperivue/medsci-skills333—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Method Writing

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Write and revise the Methods section of research papers to ensure reproducibility; use when preparing an IMRAD manuscript or responding to journal/reporting-guideline requirements (e.g…

    1.9k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review Methodology

    jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills

    Structured peer review of manuscripts and grants. An agent skill from jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills.

    374 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Methods Section Writer

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    DatabasesAuto-check passed
  • Reporting Guideline Compliance Checker

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Checks biomedical manuscripts against reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and TRIPOD to identify missing or weak reporting elements before submission or revision.

    1.9k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    DatabasesAuto-check passed
  • Make Figures

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a paper needs publication-ready figures or a visual abstract.

    333 GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    DatabasesAuto-check passed
  • G2

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Publication Specialist - Writing, Review, Pre-registration & Quality Assurance Light VS applied: Avoids template-based writing + audience-specific message design Absorbed G3 (Peer Review…

    4.6k GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility

What does Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

When should I use Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility?

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility fits situations like: settling coding reliability; PRISMA/MARS reporting; A reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

How do I install Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility, .github/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility in your project.

What does Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only.

Does Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility use?

Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility: Method Writing (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars), Peer Review Methodology (jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills, 374 stars), Methods Section Writer (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars) and Reporting Guideline Compliance Checker (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Revedres Transparency And Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.