New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Revedres Revision

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Revedres Revision

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-revision -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-revision --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-revision .claude/skills/revedres-revision && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
revedres-revision
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
528 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response.

  • Works in 5 steps: Triage the whole letter first. Group… → Update the search if asked — and re-run… → Strengthen, don't just defend. Where a… → …
  • An editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Read the decision the way RER…, How to revise so the second… and Drafting the response letter, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Revedres Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Turns the letter into action and a point-by-point reply; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or re-architect the framework from scratch (revedres-organizing-framework).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • An editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review
  • Meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response

Example prompts

  • “/revedres-revision”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Triage the whole letter first. Group comments by theme (search, framework, analysis, transparency, writing) and by editor vs. reviewer…
  2. Update the search if asked — and re-run the PRISMA flow. An expanded search changes counts everywhere; propagate them through tables, the…
  3. Strengthen, don't just defend. Where a request improves the review (more robustness, clearer framework), do it; reviewers reward visible…
  4. Push back with evidence, respectfully. If a request is out of scope or methodologically wrong, decline with a reasoned, cited explanation…
  5. Keep changes traceable. A point-by-point response: quote each comment, state the change, and cite the manuscript location (page/section)…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Revedres Revision loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 94 tokens; SKILL.md has 528 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~94
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 528 words, ~1,320 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/revedres-revision/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
revedres-revision
description
Use when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Turns the letter into action and a point-by-point reply; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or re-architect the framework from scratch (revedres-organizing-framework).

Revision (revedres-revision)

When to trigger

  • An RER decision letter arrived (major/minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit)
  • You must convert masked reviewer comments into a revision plan and a response letter
  • Reviewers ask for a wider search, more coding detail, or stronger robustness
  • You need to decide which requests to adopt and which to push back on, with evidence

Read the decision the way RER editors mean it

RER reviews are refereed against rigor of the synthesis and rigor of the review process. Most revision requests fall into recognizable buckets — diagnose each before drafting.

Reviewer requestWhat it really demandsSkill to revisit
"Expand/justify the search"a more exhaustive or better-documented search; updated PRISMArevedres-literature-synthesis
"This reads as a summary"a stronger, more reconciling organizing frameworkrevedres-organizing-framework
"Address heterogeneity / bias"I², moderators, funnel/Egger, sensitivity analysesrevedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
"Coding reliability unclear"reported κ/ICC and a shared codebookrevedres-transparency-and-reproducibility
"You vote-count conflicting work"weigh by estimand + design; steelman campsrevedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
"Over-reliance on your own work"re-balance citations identity-blindrevedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
"Tighten / APA / abstract"prose, APA 7, ≤150-word abstractrevedres-writing-style

How to revise so the second round is clean

  1. Triage the whole letter first. Group comments by theme (search, framework, analysis, transparency, writing) and by editor vs. reviewer weight — the editor's summary signals what is decisive.
  2. Update the search if asked — and re-run the PRISMA flow. An expanded search changes counts everywhere; propagate them through tables, the meta-analysis, and the prose.
  3. Strengthen, don't just defend. Where a request improves the review (more robustness, clearer framework), do it; reviewers reward visible engagement.
  4. Push back with evidence, respectfully. If a request is out of scope or methodologically wrong, decline with a reasoned, cited explanation — not silence.
  5. Keep changes traceable. A point-by-point response: quote each comment, state the change, and cite the manuscript location (page/section). Provide a tracked-changes version if requested.
Show full SKILL.md (223 more words)Show less

Drafting the response letter

  • Open with gratitude and a short summary of the main changes.
  • Point-by-point, in the reviewers' order: comment → response → exact change + location.
  • Be specific: "We added a PsycINFO + ProQuest Dissertations search (PRISMA updated: 412→468 included); see Table 2 and Figure 1."
  • Flag any protocol deviations the revision introduces, and justify them.
  • Stay calm and collegial even with a harsh review — the editor is the audience.

Checklist

  • Whole letter triaged by theme and by editor/reviewer weight
  • Search updated if requested; PRISMA counts re-run and propagated to tables/analysis/prose
  • Heterogeneity / bias / sensitivity additions made where asked
  • Coding reliability (κ/ICC) and codebook added/clarified if flagged
  • Conflicting-evidence handling moved from vote-count to credibility-weighted
  • Self-citation balance re-checked if raised
  • APA 7 / abstract / prose tightened per comments
  • Point-by-point response: comment → response → exact change + location, for every point
  • Out-of-scope/incorrect requests declined with reasoned, cited justification
  • Protocol deviations introduced by the revision flagged and justified

Anti-patterns

  • A defensive letter that argues with reviewers instead of improving the review
  • Silently ignoring comments the author dislikes (reviewers re-check every one)
  • Expanding the search but failing to update the PRISMA flow, tables, and pooled estimates
  • "We have addressed this" with no location and no specific change described
  • Adding robustness checks but burying contradictory results they surface
  • Treating a reject-and-resubmit as a rejection rather than an invitation to rebuild and return

Output format

【Decision】major | minor | reject-and-resubmit
【Triage】comments grouped by theme + editor/reviewer weight? Y/N
【Search updated】PRISMA re-run + propagated to tables/analysis/prose? Y/N
【Analysis adds】heterogeneity / bias / sensitivity added where asked? Y/N
【Transparency adds】κ/ICC + codebook clarified if flagged? Y/N
【Balance】conflict handling credibility-weighted; self-cites re-balanced? Y/N
【Response letter】point-by-point with exact change + location for every comment? Y/N
【Push-backs】out-of-scope/incorrect requests declined with cited reasons? Y/N
【Next step】→ revedres-submission (re-run preflight before resubmitting)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-revision of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Revedres Revision next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Revedres Revision compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Revedres Revision this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Review Pending PR Reviewsnrwl/nx29k—~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Reviewthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~556Automated safety check: PassMIT
ReviewClickHouse/ClickHouse50k—~8kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Docling Pull Request Reviewdocling-project/docling69k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Pre-Landing PR Reviewgarrytan/gstack136k—~20kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Review Pending PR Reviews

    nrwl/nx

    Review, grill, edit, and post pending PR review drafts saved by /review-pr (or its batch/cron runners).

    29k GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

  • Review

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when applies to product pages, local business pages, recipes, apps, books, and any page that aggregates user reviews.

    74k GitHub stars~556 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

  • Review

    ClickHouse/ClickHouse

    Review a ClickHouse Pull Request for correctness, safety, performance, and compliance.

    50k GitHub stars~8k tokensUpdated today
    DatabasesAuto-check: notes

  • Docling Pull Request Review

    docling-project/docling

    Reviews or re-reviews a Docling pull request in fixed stages, with findings that can be reproduced and an explicit record of every check that was run.

    69k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

  • Pre-Landing PR Review

    garrytan/gstack

    Reviews your diff against the base branch before merge, looking for SQL safety problems, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects and other structural issues.

    136k GitHub stars~20k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check: notes

  • Code Review Checklist

    shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code

    Reviews code against a five-part checklist covering security, correctness, performance, maintainability and testing, and reports findings in a fixed format.

    78k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Revedres Revision

What does Revedres Revision do?

A skill your agent uses when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Revedres Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response.

When should I use Revedres Revision?

Revedres Revision fits situations like: an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review; meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response.

How do I install Revedres Revision in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-revision -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-revision in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Revedres Revision in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-revision -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-revision in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Revedres Revision in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-revision -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-revision, .gemini/skills/revedres-revision, .github/skills/revedres-revision and .opencode/skills/revedres-revision in your project.

What does Revedres Revision need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Revision is instructions for the agent only.

Does Revedres Revision access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Revedres Revision safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Revedres Revision use?

Revedres Revision is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Revedres Revision use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Revedres Revision?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Revision: Review Pending PR Reviews (nrwl/nx, 29k stars), Review (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Review (ClickHouse/ClickHouse, 50k stars) and Docling Pull Request Review (docling-project/docling, 69k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Revedres Revision?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.