Agent skill

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance .claude/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
516 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis.

  • Works in 3 steps: Saturation evidence. Show that the… → Named-omission test. Could an informed… → Grey-literature & language reach.…
  • Testing exhaustiveness
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Comprehensiveness: prove there…, Balance: weigh evidence, never… and Robustness (meta-analysis):…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Hardens the synthesis against omission and fragility; it does not build the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or settle coding reliability and open materials (revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Testing exhaustiveness
  • Sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review

Example prompts

  • “/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Saturation evidence. Show that the search reached the point where new searches stopped yielding eligible studies (from…
  2. Named-omission test. Could an informed reviewer name an important study, research group, or adjacent literature you left out? If yes…
  3. Grey-literature & language reach. Excluding dissertations, reports, or non-English work narrows scope and biases effects — acknowledge…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 101 tokens; SKILL.md has 516 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~101
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 516 words, ~1,277 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
description
Use when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Hardens the synthesis against omission and fragility; it does not build the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or settle coding reliability and open materials (revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility).

Comprehensiveness & Balance (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance)

When to trigger

  • The corpus and framework exist, but you have not stress-tested coverage or robustness
  • A pooled effect is reported without heterogeneity, bias, or sensitivity analysis
  • You worry a reviewer will name an omitted study, school, or contradictory finding
  • Conflicting studies are being tallied rather than weighed by design quality

Comprehensiveness: prove there are no holes

RER asks for comprehensive reviews; the burden is on you to make exhaustiveness provable, not asserted.

  1. Saturation evidence. Show that the search reached the point where new searches stopped yielding eligible studies (from revedres-literature-synthesis).
  2. Named-omission test. Could an informed reviewer name an important study, research group, or adjacent literature you left out? If yes, include it or justify the boundary explicitly.
  3. Grey-literature & language reach. Excluding dissertations, reports, or non-English work narrows scope and biases effects — acknowledge and, where feasible, widen.

Balance: weigh evidence, never vote-count

The amateur move is vote-counting — tallying significant vs. null studies. The RER standard is to weigh evidence by what each study measures and how credibly.

  1. Risk-of-bias appraisal. Apply the a-priori tool to every included study; let credibility, not count, drive emphasis. A handful of well-identified studies can outweigh many weak ones.
  2. Estimand discipline. Reconcile conflicting findings by asking whether studies estimate the same object (population, construct, horizon, comparison). Apparent contradictions often dissolve.
  3. Steelman rival perspectives. State each theoretical or methodological camp at its strongest before its limits; flag — and bracket — your own program so emphasis is identity-blind.
Show full SKILL.md (268 more words)Show less

Robustness (meta-analysis): make the number survive scrutiny

A pooled effect is a claim, not a fact, until you show it is not an artifact.

ProbeWhat it guards against
Heterogeneity (Q, I², τ²)reporting one number for a mix of different effects
Moderator analysismasking real variation the framework should explain
Publication-bias diagnostics (funnel, Egger, trim-and-fill, p-curve/selection models)an inflated effect from missing null results
Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out, influence, alternative models)a result driven by one study or one modeling choice
Dependent-effects handling (multilevel / robust variance)false precision from multiple effects per sample

For a narrative synthesis, the analogues are: confidence in the body of evidence (e.g. a GRADE-style judgment), explicit handling of conflicting findings, and a sensitivity check on which conclusions survive dropping the weakest studies.

Checklist

  • Saturation documented; no eligible study/database a reviewer could name as missing
  • Grey-literature/language exclusions acknowledged with their bias implications
  • Risk-of-bias appraised for every study; emphasis tracks credibility, not count
  • Conflicting findings reconciled by estimand + design, not tallied
  • Rival camps steelmanned; author's own work bracketed for identity-blind emphasis
  • (Meta) heterogeneity, moderators, publication-bias, and sensitivity all reported
  • (Meta) dependent effects modeled (multilevel / robust variance), not ignored
  • (Narrative) strength-of-evidence judged and a drop-the-weakest sensitivity check run

Anti-patterns

  • Vote-counting significant vs. null studies as if each carries equal weight
  • A single pooled effect with no I²/τ², no moderators, and no publication-bias check
  • Ignoring dependent effect sizes, manufacturing false precision
  • Excluding grey literature silently, then reporting an upward-biased effect
  • Caricaturing the camp the author disagrees with instead of steelmanning it
  • Treating "I found a lot of studies" as proof of comprehensiveness without saturation evidence

Output format

【Saturation】documented? Y/N — named-omission test passed? Y/N
【Grey lit / language】exclusions + bias implication stated? Y/N
【Risk of bias】appraised for all studies; emphasis credibility-weighted? Y/N
【Conflict handling】reconciled by estimand/design (not vote-count)? Y/N
【Heterogeneity】I²/τ² + moderators reported? Y/N (meta) | strength-of-evidence judged (narrative)
【Publication bias】funnel/Egger/trim-fill/p-curve run? Y/N
【Sensitivity】leave-one-out / alt models / dependent-effects model? Y/N
【Next step】→ revedres-tables-figures (PRISMA flow, forest/funnel, coding tables)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance

What does Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance do?

A skill your agent uses when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis.

When should I use Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance?

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance fits situations like: testing exhaustiveness; sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review.

How do I install Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance, .gemini/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance, .github/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance and .opencode/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance in your project.

What does Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance is instructions for the agent only.

Does Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance use?

Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Revedres Comprehensiveness And Balance?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.