A skill your agent uses when deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST)…

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Revacc Workflow

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revacc-workflow -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revacc-workflow --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-workflow .claude/skills/revacc-workflow && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
revacc-workflow
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
846 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST)…

  • Works in 11 steps: revacc-topic-selection — lock a… → revacc-theory-development — build the… → revacc-literature-positioning — stake… → …
  • Deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, When to trigger, Routing table and Default order, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Revacc Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Accounting and bookkeeping. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next
  • Sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission

Example prompts

  • “/revacc-workflow”

Workflow steps

11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. revacc-topic-selection — lock a contribution-driven financial-accounting question with RAST fit
  2. revacc-theory-development — build the friction/mechanism, or the analytical model and propositions
  3. revacc-literature-positioning — stake the contribution vs. the accounting frontier and the siblings
  4. revacc-methods — design identification (or fix model primitives) matched to the question
  5. revacc-data-analysis — estimator, FE, clustering, construct validation, robustness
  6. revacc-contribution-framing — turn results into an explicit accounting contribution
  7. revacc-tables-figures — finalize main exhibits in accounting house style
  8. revacc-writing-style — full-manuscript prose polish (abstract + intro last)
  9. revacc-submission — Editorial Manager preflight (anonymization, fee, files)
  10. revacc-review-process — calibrate expectations for the first-round-decision model
  11. revacc-rebuttal — after an R&R, revise then draft the response

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Revacc Workflow loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 64 tokens; SKILL.md has 846 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~64
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 846 words, ~1,926 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/revacc-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
revacc-workflow
description
Use when deciding which revacc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

RAST Workflow Router (revacc-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which revacc- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) — the Springer top-tier accounting journal edited by Paul Fischer (待核实; 检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). RAST sits squarely in financial accounting and reporting: disclosure, earnings quality and management, valuation and capital markets, analysts and forecasting, audit, taxation, and the economic consequences of accounting. Crucially, RAST publishes three method lanes side by side — empirical archival, analytical (modeling), and some experimental work — and is known for methodological rigor with a relatively fast, well-run process.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as RAST. Operational tells that you are at RAST and not a sibling or a generic top journal: submission runs through Editorial Manager (Springer), with a submission fee of USD $500 payable within 7 days or the paper is withdrawn (待核实; 检索于 2026-06); review is double-blind; the journal advertises prompt turnaround and an explicit tradition of making an accept/reject decision on the first round for most manuscripts (rather than many R&R cycles); abstracts run roughly 150–250 words (待核实); and there is a recurring RAST Conference whose accepted papers feed a conference issue while all conference submissions are also considered for the regular journal. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official Springer page.

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?" with a half-built RAST manuscript
  • A draft's current bottleneck — fit, model, identification, evidence, exhibits, prose — is unclear
  • Work is ping-ponging between modeling/estimation, framing, writing, and the response letter
  • A RAST decision letter arrived (often a terse first-round accept/reject) and the user must decide whether to rebut, revise, or redirect

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Question feels generic, atheoretical, or not clearly financial-accountingrevacc-topic-selection
Predictions are bald associations; no friction/model; analytical paper lacks a clean equilibriumrevacc-theory-development
Contribution vs. TAR/JAR/JAE/CAR and the disclosure/earnings frontier is fuzzyrevacc-literature-positioning
Identification design (DiD, IV, RDD, event study) or analytical solution concept is shakyrevacc-methods
Estimation, clustering, construct measurement, robustness, or proxy validation need workrevacc-data-analysis
Results exist but the "so what for accounting" is thinrevacc-contribution-framing
Exhibits are dense, off house style, or do not answer the questionrevacc-tables-figures
Prose buries the result; intro/abstract do not landrevacc-writing-style
Ready to submit via Editorial Manager; need a preflight and the fee/anonymization checkrevacc-submission
Want to understand RAST's first-round-decision norm, conference path, or timelinerevacc-review-process
Received an R&R (rarer at RAST); need a response-letter strategyrevacc-rebuttal

Default order

  1. revacc-topic-selection — lock a contribution-driven financial-accounting question with RAST fit
  2. revacc-theory-development — build the friction/mechanism, or the analytical model and propositions
  3. revacc-literature-positioning — stake the contribution vs. the accounting frontier and the siblings
  4. revacc-methods — design identification (or fix model primitives) matched to the question
  5. revacc-data-analysis — estimator, FE, clustering, construct validation, robustness
  6. revacc-contribution-framing — turn results into an explicit accounting contribution
  7. revacc-tables-figures — finalize main exhibits in accounting house style
  8. revacc-writing-style — full-manuscript prose polish (abstract + intro last)
  9. revacc-submission — Editorial Manager preflight (anonymization, fee, files)
  10. revacc-review-process — calibrate expectations for the first-round-decision model
  11. revacc-rebuttal — after an R&R, revise then draft the response

revacc-tables-figures and revacc-writing-style are late-stage polish. Do not invoke them while identification, the model, or the contribution is still unsettled.

Show full SKILL.md (306 more words)Show less

Routing by paper archetype

RAST's three lanes have different first bottlenecks. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

ArchetypeLikely first bottleneckEnter at
empirical archival (disclosure/earnings/valuation event)identification credibility + construct measurementrevacc-methods → revacc-data-analysis
analytical / disclosure modelminimal primitives, equilibrium, comparative statics with an accounting payoffrevacc-theory-development
analyst/forecasting capital-marketsproxy validity (I/B/E/S), confounding events, return-window choicesrevacc-data-analysis
experimental (investor/auditor/manager)construct manipulation, channel isolation, powerrevacc-theory-development → revacc-methods

Difference vs. the AAA/Chicago/Elsevier family

  • RAST is the Springer top accounting outlet that explicitly welcomes both archival and analytical work, with a fast first-round-decision culture and the RAST Conference path.
  • TAR (The Accounting Review, AAA) is method-agnostic and contribution-first but archival-dominated; JAR (Chicago Booth/Wiley) prizes identification and posts a data-and-code package; JAE (Elsevier) leans economics-of-accounting with an archival house style and the JAE data archive; CAR (CPA Canada/Wiley) is broad and methodologically catholic. If your study is purely a methods demonstration with no accounting payoff, RAST is the wrong venue.

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My analytical disclosure model solves, but a referee says the equilibrium is not the minimal structure and the comparative static has no obvious accounting reading." That is two RAST-analytical pushbacks — model not parsimonious and no accounting payoff — both owned by revacc-theory-development, with positioning against the disclosure-theory frontier in revacc-literature-positioning. Route there first; only once the proposition is the leanest one that delivers an accounting-relevant comparative static do you move to revacc-tables-figures (for the equilibrium illustration) and revacc-writing-style.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating RAST as archival-only and shoehorning an analytical paper through an empirical chain (or vice versa)
  • Treating RAST like TAR, JAR, JAE, or CAR — different owners, portals, data policies, and decision cultures
  • Polishing prose or exhibits before identification, the model, and the contribution are stable
  • Assuming many R&R rounds: RAST's first-round-decision norm raises the bar on the initial submission

Output format

text
【Target】Review of Accounting Studies (Springer)
【Lane】archival / analytical / experimental
【Current bottleneck】fit / model / identification / evidence / exhibits / style / submission / revision
【Next skill】<one revacc-* skill>
【Reason】why this step is the binding constraint
【Source check】official facts verified or marked 待核实

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Revacc Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Revacc Workflow compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Revacc Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sync Upstreamnyaruka/phonenumbers1.6k—~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Radiology Tablehuang-sir1/radiology-skills1.9k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
ERPClaw ERP Controlleravansaber/erpclaw114—~18kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
Odoo Agency Fleet Reviewerpipe-org/mcp-odoo421—~699Automated safety check: PassMIT
Beancount Closebex-co/beancount-io296—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Sync Upstream

    nyaruka/phonenumbers

    Sync this Go port with a new upstream google/libphonenumber release — regenerate the embedded metadata and reconcile the ported Java logic.

    1.6k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 7 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Radiology Table

    huang-sir1/radiology-skills

    Create/audit editable publication tables with source reconciliation; not figures or statistical inference.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 18 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • ERPClaw ERP Controller

    avansaber/erpclaw

    Operates the ERPClaw self-hosted ERP in plain language: accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, HR, payroll and reports, treating the ERP as the single source of truth.

    114 GitHub stars~18k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Odoo Agency Fleet Review

    erpipe-org/mcp-odoo

    Review many client Odoo databases at once through odoo-mcp's cross-instance tools — fleet-wide accounting health, per-client aging, partial-failure triage — for agencies and partners managing 5–50…

    421 GitHub stars~699 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Beancount Close

    bex-co/beancount-io

    Close an accounting period in a Beancount ledger by reconciling each active account through beancount-reconcile, checking assertions and recurring gaps, reviewing flags, then proposing a commit with…

    296 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Forward Implementation First

    Vuk97/forward-implementation-first

    Keeps an agent building and validating real output instead of servicing its own bookkeeping.

    176 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Revacc Workflow

What does Revacc Workflow do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST)…. Revacc Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission.

When should I use Revacc Workflow?

Revacc Workflow fits situations like: deciding which revacc- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission.

How do I install Revacc Workflow in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revacc-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revacc-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Revacc Workflow in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revacc-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revacc-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Revacc Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revacc-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revacc-workflow, .gemini/skills/revacc-workflow, .github/skills/revacc-workflow and .opencode/skills/revacc-workflow in your project.

What does Revacc Workflow need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revacc Workflow is instructions for the agent only.

Does Revacc Workflow access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Revacc Workflow safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Revacc Workflow use?

Revacc Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Revacc Workflow use?

About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Revacc Workflow?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revacc Workflow: Sync Upstream (nyaruka/phonenumbers, 1.6k stars), Radiology Table (huang-sir1/radiology-skills, 1.9k stars), ERPClaw ERP Controller (avansaber/erpclaw, 114 stars) and Odoo Agency Fleet Review (erpipe-org/mcp-odoo, 421 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Revacc Workflow?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.