A skill your agent uses when deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Respol Workflow

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill respol-workflow -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills respol-workflow --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Research-Policy-Skills/skills/respol-workflow .claude/skills/respol-workflow && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
respol-workflow
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
731 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission.

  • Works in 11 steps: respol-topic-selection — lock an… → respol-theory-development — build the… → respol-literature-positioning — stake… → …
  • Deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, When to trigger, Routing table and Default order, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Respol Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next
  • Sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission

Example prompts

  • “/respol-workflow”

Workflow steps

11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. respol-topic-selection — lock an innovation-studies question RP owns
  2. respol-theory-development — build the mechanism / conceptual frame
  3. respol-literature-positioning — stake the gap against the RP/SPRU canon
  4. respol-methods — design and measurement appropriate to the claim
  5. respol-data-analysis — estimation / bibliometric build / coding + robustness
  6. respol-contribution-framing — sharpen the "so what + policy/managerial" claim
  7. respol-tables-figures — exhibits that carry the mechanism
  8. respol-writing-style — make the idea land (intro/abstract last)
  9. respol-submission — Editorial Manager preflight + data/code statement
  10. respol-review-process — calibrate expectations; consider Research Note
  11. respol-rebuttal — after the R&R

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Respol Workflow loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 58 tokens; SKILL.md has 731 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~58
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 731 words, ~1,786 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/respol-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
respol-workflow
description
Use when deciding which respol-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Research Policy Workflow Router (respol-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It names which respol- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at Research Policy (RP) — Elsevier's flagship journal of innovation studies and science, technology & innovation (STI) policy. RP's center of gravity is the economics, management, and sociology of innovation: R&D and technological change, national/regional/sectoral innovation systems, science and technology policy, entrepreneurship and technology management, university-industry links, and intellectual property. It is deeply interdisciplinary and carries the SPRU/Freeman-Nelson-Pavitt heritage; a paper earns space by advancing innovation-studies understanding, usually with a policy or managerial implication.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as RP. Operational tells that you are at RP and not a sibling: the contribution is to innovation theory or evidence, not to a generic strategy or economics conversation; methods are pluralist (econometrics, bibliometrics/patent analysis, surveys, case studies, mixed methods) and no single technique is privileged; review is double-blind; the desk-screen rejects papers whose literature is "almost entirely economics or management journals" as out of scope (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Article types include full articles (~8,000–10,000 words incl. notes/refs/tables) and shorter Research Notes (~3,000–5,000 words) — verify on the guide for authors.

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?" on an RP-bound manuscript
  • A draft's current bottleneck is unclear and needs diagnosis
  • Work is ping-ponging between framing, theory, design, evidence, exhibits, and the response letter
  • An RP decision letter arrived and the user must switch into revision mode
  • The team is debating RP vs. a sibling (Industrial and Corporate Change, Technovation, JPIM, SMJ)

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Scope/audience/outlet fit uncertain; risk of "out of scope" desk rejectrespol-topic-selection
The innovation-studies conceptual contribution is thin or borrowedrespol-theory-development
Contribution vs. the innovation-studies frontier is fuzzy or mis-citedrespol-literature-positioning
Identification / measurement / design (patent, survey, case, mixed) is shakyrespol-methods
Estimation, bibliometric construction, coding, or robustness needs workrespol-data-analysis
The one-sentence "so what for innovation studies + policy" does not landrespol-contribution-framing
Exhibits are dense or do not carry the mechanismrespol-tables-figures
Prose buries the idea; intro/abstract miss the RP voicerespol-writing-style
Ready to submit; need a preflight + data/code statementrespol-submission
Want referee timeline / desk-reject odds / Research Note optionrespol-review-process
Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategyrespol-rebuttal

Default order

  1. respol-topic-selection — lock an innovation-studies question RP owns
  2. respol-theory-development — build the mechanism / conceptual frame
  3. respol-literature-positioning — stake the gap against the RP/SPRU canon
  4. respol-methods — design and measurement appropriate to the claim
  5. respol-data-analysis — estimation / bibliometric build / coding + robustness
  6. respol-contribution-framing — sharpen the "so what + policy/managerial" claim
  7. respol-tables-figures — exhibits that carry the mechanism
  8. respol-writing-style — make the idea land (intro/abstract last)
  9. respol-submission — Editorial Manager preflight + data/code statement
  10. respol-review-process — calibrate expectations; consider Research Note
  11. respol-rebuttal — after the R&R

respol-writing-style is a late polish; do not rewrite the intro before theory, design, and evidence settle.

Show full SKILL.md (257 more words)Show less

Routing by paper archetype

RP spans several research traditions, and the binding constraint differs by tradition. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

ArchetypeLikely first bottleneckEnter at
Patent / bibliometric quantitativeconstruct validity of the indicator + endogeneityrespol-methods → respol-data-analysis
Policy-evaluation / causal (R&D subsidy, mission programs)identification (DID/IV/RDD) + policy-invariance of mechanismrespol-methods
Survey on innovation behavior (firm/CIS-style)measurement, common-method bias, generalizabilityrespol-methods → respol-data-analysis
Qualitative / case study of an innovation systemtheoretical generalization + boundary conditionsrespol-theory-development
Mixed-methods (cases + patents/survey)integration logic, not two papers stapled togetherrespol-theory-development → respol-methods
Conceptual / typology of innovation systemsnovelty vs. the SPRU canon; falsifiabilityrespol-literature-positioning

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My patent-based paper on regional knowledge spillovers estimates fine, but a referee says the citation measure is endogenous and that the paper reads like an economics-of-geography paper, not innovation studies." That is two distinct RP pushbacks — an indicator/identification problem owned by respol-methods and respol-data-analysis, and a positioning/scope problem owned by respol-literature-positioning. Route to methods first to defend the patent-citation measure (e.g., self-citation correction, examiner vs. applicant citations), then to positioning to re-anchor the contribution in the innovation-systems literature so it reads as RP, not JEG.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating RP as interchangeable with SMJ (strategy), Management Science (general management science), Industrial and Corporate Change, Technovation, or JPIM
  • Polishing prose before theory, design, and the evidence hierarchy are stable
  • Skipping respol-topic-selection and submitting a paper whose lit base is "all econ/management" — the classic out-of-scope desk reject
  • Letting the appendix carry a claim the main text must establish

Minimal decision snippet

if decision_letter_arrived:         -> respol-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit:               -> respol-submission
elif exhibits_unclear:              -> respol-tables-figures
elif claim_or_so_what_fuzzy:        -> respol-contribution-framing
elif estimation_or_indicator:       -> respol-data-analysis
elif design_or_measurement_shaky:   -> respol-methods
elif theory_thin:                   -> respol-theory-development
elif positioning_or_scope_fuzzy:    -> respol-literature-positioning / respol-topic-selection
else:                               -> respol-topic-selection

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Research-Policy-Skills/skills/respol-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Respol Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Respol Workflow compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Respol Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Respol Workflow

What does Respol Workflow do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission. Respol Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission.

When should I use Respol Workflow?

Respol Workflow fits situations like: deciding which respol- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Research Policy (RP) submission.

How do I install Respol Workflow in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill respol-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Research-Policy-Skills/skills/respol-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/respol-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Respol Workflow in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill respol-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Research-Policy-Skills/skills/respol-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/respol-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Respol Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill respol-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/respol-workflow, .gemini/skills/respol-workflow, .github/skills/respol-workflow and .opencode/skills/respol-workflow in your project.

What does Respol Workflow need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Respol Workflow is instructions for the agent only.

Does Respol Workflow access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Respol Workflow safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Respol Workflow use?

Respol Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Respol Workflow use?

About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Respol Workflow?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Respol Workflow: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Respol Workflow?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.