Hypothesis Generation
spacering-net/codeg
Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.
A skill your agent uses when deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a broad integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece from topic through revision…
Install Ppsych Workflow
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-workflow --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow .claude/skills/ppsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ppsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow into .claude/skills/ppsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflowType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-workflow --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow .agents/skills/ppsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow into .agents/skills/ppsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-workflow --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow .cursor/skills/ppsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ppsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow into .cursor/skills/ppsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-workflow --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow .gemini/skills/ppsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow into .gemini/skills/ppsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-workflowInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow .github/skills/ppsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow into .github/skills/ppsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-workflow --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow .opencode/skills/ppsych-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow into .opencode/skills/ppsych-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ppsych-workflow- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 744 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a broad integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece from topic through revision…
- Works in 11 steps: ppsych-topic-selection — confirm the… → ppsych-proposal-and-commissioning —… → ppsych-literature-synthesis — read… → …
- Deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next
- SKILL.md covers Overview, When to trigger, First question: contribution… and Routing table (symptom → next…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Ppsych Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a broad integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece from topic through revision for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript. Routes by lifecycle stage and contribution type; it dispatches and does not draft content.
Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next
- Sequencing a broad integrative review
- Theoretical statement
- Meta-science piece from topic through revision for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript
Example prompts
- “/ppsych-workflow”
Workflow steps
11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- ppsych-topic-selection — confirm the question is broad, integrative, PoPS-scale
- ppsych-proposal-and-commissioning — proposal route (required for cooperative/miscellaneous)
- ppsych-literature-synthesis — read across areas systematically
- ppsych-organizing-framework — impose the analytical/conceptual spine
- ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance — fair, field-spanning, reform-minded but evidence-based
- ppsych-tables-figures — framework figure + summary/prevalence exhibits
- ppsych-writing-style — the PoPS voice (broad, provocative, accessible); abstract ≤ 200 words last
- ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility — exemplary open science (PoPS is a leader)
- ppsych-editor-strategy — scope and the editor relationship
- ppsych-submission — ScholarOne preflight + suggested reviewers
- ppsych-revision — after the decision letter
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ppsych Workflow loads about 2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 744 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 744 words, ~1,979 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ppsych-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ppsych-workflow
- description
- Use when deciding which ppsych-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a broad integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece from topic through revision for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript. Routes by lifecycle stage and contribution type; it dispatches and does not draft content.
PoPS Workflow Router (ppsych-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It tells you which ppsych- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) — the SAGE journal published in partnership with the Association for Psychological Science (APS), a bimonthly, broad, integrative outlet (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). PoPS does not publish single empirical studies (those go to Psychological Science) or routine meta-analyses (those go to specialized review journals). It publishes broad integrative reviews, overviews of research programs, theoretical and conceptual statements, methodology and meta-science commentary, and big-picture "perspective" pieces across all of psychology and adjacent behavioral, social, neuro, and methods fields (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). The contribution is a field-shaping synthesis or argument, not a new dataset.
So the lifecycle is not "design → run → estimate → defend." It is: find a synthesis- or argument-worthy question → decide whether a proposal is required → read across areas → impose an organizing framework → make the treatment comprehensive and balanced → model exemplary open science → manage the editor relationship → submit → revise. Default assumption unless the user says otherwise: the target is PoPS and the artefact is a broad integrative/theoretical/meta-science piece, not a primary-research paper.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?" on a PoPS review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece
- A draft reads like an annotated bibliography or a single-study report and needs a spine or a venue check
- Work is ping-ponging between coverage, framing, balance, open-science, and the proposal route
- A PoPS decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
First question: contribution type
| Situation | Type | Route note |
|---|---|---|
| Broad cross-area synthesis / overview of a research program | Stand-alone integrative review | main pipeline; proposal optional |
| A unifying theoretical / conceptual / metatheoretical argument | Theoretical statement | ppsych-organizing-framework is the engine |
| Systematic evidence about the field's practices (replication, bias, methods) | Meta-science / methodology | ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility early |
| Special issue, adversarial collaboration, multilab effort | Cooperative contribution | proposal required → ppsych-proposal-and-commissioning |
| Biography, book review, humor/opinion essay | Miscellaneous | proposal required → ppsych-proposal-and-commissioning |
| Single empirical study, or a routine meta-analysis | Out of scope | → Psychological Science / a specialized review journal |
A positive editor reaction to a proposal is not an invitation; all manuscripts go through the same review (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
Routing table (symptom → next skill)
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure the question is PoPS-shaped (broad, integrative, not a single study) | ppsych-topic-selection |
| Need a proposal (cooperative/miscellaneous) or want to test a stand-alone idea | ppsych-proposal-and-commissioning |
| Reading is unsystematic; cross-area coverage gaps likely | ppsych-literature-synthesis |
| Draft is a list of papers, not an argument about the field | ppsych-organizing-framework |
| Coverage, balance, or fairness across areas/camps in doubt | ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| Need a framework figure or who-found-what / practice-prevalence table | ppsych-tables-figures |
| Prose dense or insular; a psychologist from another area can't follow | ppsych-writing-style |
| Open data/materials/code, preregistration of a meta-science protocol | ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility |
| Working with the editor on scope / what referees will weigh | ppsych-editor-strategy |
| Ready to submit; need a preflight and reviewer suggestions | ppsych-submission |
| Received a PoPS decision letter | ppsych-revision |
Show full SKILL.md (268 more words)Show less
Default order
ppsych-topic-selection— confirm the question is broad, integrative, PoPS-scaleppsych-proposal-and-commissioning— proposal route (required for cooperative/miscellaneous)ppsych-literature-synthesis— read across areas systematicallyppsych-organizing-framework— impose the analytical/conceptual spineppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance— fair, field-spanning, reform-minded but evidence-basedppsych-tables-figures— framework figure + summary/prevalence exhibitsppsych-writing-style— the PoPS voice (broad, provocative, accessible); abstract ≤ 200 words lastppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility— exemplary open science (PoPS is a leader)ppsych-editor-strategy— scope and the editor relationshipppsych-submission— ScholarOne preflight + suggested reviewersppsych-revision— after the decision letter
ppsych-writing-styleis a late polish — do not rewrite the intro before the framework and balance settle. For meta-science, pullppsych-transparency-and-reproducibilityforward: the systematic protocol is part of the design, not an afterthought.
Anti-patterns
- Treating PoPS like Psychological Science: it does not take single empirical studies or routine meta-analyses (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准)
- Submitting a cooperative or miscellaneous piece with no proposal, or reading a proposal's positive feedback as an acceptance
- The annotated-bibliography failure: a "review" with no organizing argument
- Letting the author's own program become the review's center of gravity (self-promotion)
- Confusing PoPS with Psychological Bulletin (formal meta-analyses), Annual Review of Psychology (invited subfield surveys), or Current Directions (short, non-technical) — PoPS is the APS broad integrative + meta-science flagship
Routing by archetype
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|---|---|---|
| field-defining integrative review | scope is enormous; needs a taxonomy | ppsych-organizing-framework |
| unifying theoretical statement | the argument itself, not coverage | ppsych-organizing-framework |
| meta-science / reform piece | systematic evidence + open protocol | ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility |
| big-picture opinion / perspective | is it broad and defensible enough for PoPS? | ppsych-topic-selection |
Minimal decision snippet
if decision_letter: -> ppsych-revision
elif ready_to_submit: -> ppsych-submission
elif open_science_or_metascience: -> ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility
elif prose_dense_or_insular: -> ppsych-writing-style
elif need_tables_or_figures: -> ppsych-tables-figures
elif coverage_or_balance_in_doubt: -> ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance
elif reads_like_a_list: -> ppsych-organizing-framework
elif reading_unsystematic: -> ppsych-literature-synthesis
elif needs_proposal_or_idea_test: -> ppsych-proposal-and-commissioning
else: -> ppsych-topic-selectionSupplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— search, preregistration, repositories, synthesis tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md— official PoPS URLs behind every fact in this pack
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ppsych Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ppsych Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg | 3.8k | 15 repos | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow | 83k | 5 repos | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 46k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Read arXiv Paperkarpathy/nanochat | 58k | 2 repos | ~494 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss | 1.9k | 25 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
GitHub Deep Research
bytedance/deer-flow
Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.
Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
Read arXiv Paper
karpathy/nanochat
Fetches the TeX source of an arXiv paper from its URL, reads it and writes a markdown summary tied to the nanochat project.
Content Research Writer
weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.
Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Ppsych Workflow
What does Ppsych Workflow do?
A skill your agent uses when deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a broad integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece from topic through revision…. Ppsych Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a broad integrative review, theoretical statement, or meta-science piece from topic through revision for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript.
When should I use Ppsych Workflow?
Ppsych Workflow fits situations like: deciding which ppsych- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing a broad integrative review; theoretical statement; meta-science piece from topic through revision for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript.
How do I install Ppsych Workflow in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ppsych-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ppsych Workflow in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ppsych-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ppsych Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ppsych-workflow, .gemini/skills/ppsych-workflow, .github/skills/ppsych-workflow and .opencode/skills/ppsych-workflow in your project.
What does Ppsych Workflow need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ppsych Workflow is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ppsych Workflow access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ppsych Workflow safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ppsych Workflow use?
Ppsych Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ppsych Workflow use?
About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ppsych Workflow?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ppsych Workflow: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.8k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 83k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 46k stars) and Read arXiv Paper (karpathy/nanochat, 58k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ppsych Workflow?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.