Agent skill

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility .claude/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
615 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented…

  • Works in 4 steps: Preregister the sampling frame,… → Deposit the coded dataset, the coding… → Report reliability for subjective coding… → …
  • A documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Why this matters more at PoPS…, What the obligation bites on… and PoPS / SAGE policy facts (检索于…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science, and exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader). Builds the transparency layer; it does not draft the synthesis (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • A documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science
  • Exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader)

Example prompts

  • “/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Preregister the sampling frame, inclusion/exclusion rules, and the coding scheme (OSF/AsPredicted) before coding, and report the…
  2. Deposit the coded dataset, the coding manual, and the analysis scripts (R/Python) in a public repository (OSF, GitHub + Zenodo DOI).
  3. Report reliability for subjective coding (two coders, inter-rater agreement) so the prevalence claims are not one reader's judgment.
  4. Make figures reproducible — every prevalence/forest exhibit regenerates from the deposited data and script.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 121 tokens; SKILL.md has 615 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~121
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 615 words, ~1,543 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility
description
Use when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science, and exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader). Builds the transparency layer; it does not draft the synthesis (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission).

Transparency & Reproducibility (ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility)

When to trigger

  • The piece reports or reuses any original data and you must make it available
  • The piece is meta-science and its systematic coverage/coding must be reproducible
  • You are deciding what to preregister, deposit, and disclose for a field-shaping reform piece
  • You want the open-science layer to be drafted from live identifiers, not promised at acceptance

Why this matters more at PoPS than almost anywhere

PoPS is a leading venue for the open-science and replication movement — much of the meta-science that reshaped psychology's methods appeared here. The journal's readers and reviewers hold reform-adjacent work to its own standard: a piece arguing for transparency that is itself opaque loses all authority. The bar is exemplary practice, especially for the reform/meta-science pieces that are PoPS's signature. Build the transparency layer early so the statements are written from real DOIs and OSF links, not aspirations.

What the obligation bites on (by piece type)

Piece typeWhere transparency applies
Integrative review / theoretical statementthe systematic coverage account (search strategy, inclusion/exclusion from ppsych-literature-synthesis); no new data of its own
Meta-science / methodologythe systematic protocol — sampling frame, coding scheme, double-coding/reliability, and the data + code behind every prevalence figure or statistic
Meta-analysis with a superordinate messagefull meta-analytic dataset, effect-size extraction, and analysis code, reproducibly deposited
Any piece including original datathe data must be in a repository; the cover letter confirms ethical data collection (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)

PoPS / SAGE policy facts (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准 — re-confirm on the author pages)

  • Original data → repository. When original data are included, they must be available in a repository; deposit and cite the dataset (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
  • Ethical-collection confirmation. Authors confirm in the cover letter that data collection followed ethical guidelines (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
  • Open-practice norms. APS has historically pioneered Open Practice badges (Open Data, Open Materials, Preregistration) at its journals; confirm current badge availability and criteria for PoPS on the author pages, since policy evolves (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准 · 待核实 for the exact current PoPS badge set).
  • TOP-style sharing. Treat the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines as the baseline expectation for data/code/materials sharing; map your deposits to it (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
Show full SKILL.md (266 more words)Show less

Building the reproducible meta-science protocol

For a reform/meta-science piece, the protocol is the design — make it auditable:

  1. Preregister the sampling frame, inclusion/exclusion rules, and the coding scheme (OSF/AsPredicted) before coding, and report the registration link. Mark any deviation as a deviation.
  2. Deposit the coded dataset, the coding manual, and the analysis scripts (R/Python) in a public repository (OSF, GitHub + Zenodo DOI).
  3. Report reliability for subjective coding (two coders, inter-rater agreement) so the prevalence claims are not one reader's judgment.
  4. Make figures reproducible — every prevalence/forest exhibit regenerates from the deposited data and script.

Checklist

  • Piece type identified; the right transparency obligation selected (coverage account vs. data+code)
  • Any original data deposited in a repository and cited; ethical-collection confirmation in the cover letter
  • Meta-science: protocol preregistered (frame + inclusion + coding); registration link reported
  • Meta-science / meta-analysis: dataset, coding manual, and analysis code deposited (OSF/Zenodo DOI)
  • Inter-rater reliability reported for subjective coding
  • Every prevalence/forest figure regenerates from deposited data + script
  • Deposits mapped to TOP-level expectations; Open-Practice badge eligibility checked (待核实 current set)
  • Transparency statements drafted from live identifiers, not promises
  • AI-use and conflict-of-interest disclosures prepared per current policy

Anti-patterns

  • A reform/transparency argument that is itself unreproducible (fatal credibility loss at PoPS)
  • "Data available upon request" instead of a repository deposit when original data are included
  • A meta-science prevalence figure with an undisclosed, unpreregistered sampling frame
  • One-coder subjective extraction presented as fact, with no reliability statistic
  • Promising open data/code at acceptance instead of depositing and citing it at submission
  • Asserting the current badge set, TOP level, or data policy from memory rather than the live SAGE/APS pages

Output format

text
【Piece type】review/theory / meta-science / meta-analysis / includes-original-data
【Coverage account】search + inclusion/exclusion documented (review/theory)? Y/N · N/A
【Data deposit】original data in repository + cited; ethical-collection confirmed in cover letter? Y/N · N/A
【Preregistration】meta-science protocol preregistered; link reported? Y/N · N/A
【Code/materials】coding manual + analysis scripts deposited (DOI)? Y/N · N/A
【Reliability】inter-rater agreement reported for subjective coding? Y/N · N/A
【Reproducible figures】prevalence/forest exhibits regenerate from deposit? Y/N · N/A
【Policy re-confirm】badges / TOP level / data policy checked on SAGE/APS pages? Y/N · 待核实
【Next step】→ ppsych-editor-strategy → ppsych-submission

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility

What does Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented…. Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science, and exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader).

When should I use Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility?

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility fits situations like: A documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science; exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader).

How do I install Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility, .github/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility in your project.

What does Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility use?

Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ppsych Transparency And Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.