Bio Fragment Analysis
GPTomics/bioSkills
Extracts cfDNA fragmentomics features (DELFI genome-wide short/long ratios, WPS nucleosome positioning, Griffin GC-corrected accessibility profiles, end-motifs/MDS, OCF) for cancer detection and…
A skill your agent uses when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks…
Install Ppsych Revision
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-revision --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision .claude/skills/ppsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ppsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision into .claude/skills/ppsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revisionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-revision --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision .agents/skills/ppsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision into .agents/skills/ppsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-revision --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision .cursor/skills/ppsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ppsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision into .cursor/skills/ppsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-revision --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision .gemini/skills/ppsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision into .gemini/skills/ppsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-revisionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision .github/skills/ppsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision into .github/skills/ppsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-revision --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision .opencode/skills/ppsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision into .opencode/skills/ppsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ppsych-revision- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 587 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks…
- Responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Categories of review feedback…, Writing the response letter and Checklist, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Balance/fairness complaints
What it does
Ppsych Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks, accessibility, and open-science requests. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (ppsych-organizing-framework).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research, Test coverage and Accessibility. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps
- Balance/fairness complaints
- Framework/argument asks
- Open-science requests
Example prompts
- “/ppsych-revision”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ppsych Revision loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 100 tokens; SKILL.md has 587 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 587 words, ~1,467 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ppsych-revision/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ppsych-revision
- description
- Use when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks, accessibility, and open-science requests. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (ppsych-organizing-framework).
Revision & Response for a Perspective (ppsych-revision)
When to trigger
- A PoPS decision letter (major/minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit) arrived
- Reviewers flagged missing literatures, imbalance, mischaracterization, or "reads like a list"
- The editor asked to broaden, sharpen, or rebalance the argument, or to strengthen open science
- You need a point-by-point response for a perspective, not a primary paper
Categories of review feedback (and how to answer each)
PoPS revision asks cluster differently from primary-research asks. Triage every point into one bucket:
| Feedback type | Typical phrasing | Response move |
|---|---|---|
| Scope / superordinate message | "this reads like a single study / one paradigm" | sharpen the broad claim; show the cross-area payoff (ppsych-topic-selection) |
| Coverage gap | "you omit the X literature / area Y" | almost always concede and integrate — place it in the right framework cell; re-run saturation (ppsych-literature-synthesis) |
| Balance / fairness | "this slights camp Z / over-cites the author / one-sided reform" | steelman the slighted side; re-audit self-citation and reform calibration (ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance) |
| Appraisal accuracy | "you mischaracterize study/finding W" | correct precisely; reviewed authors often referee — fix exactly |
| Framework / argument | "this is an annotated bibliography" | strengthen or make explicit the spine (ppsych-organizing-framework); don't just reorder |
| Accessibility / provocation | "a non-specialist can't follow §4" / "what's the take-home?" | add intuition, define jargon, state the claim earlier (ppsych-writing-style) |
| Open science | "deposit the coding data / preregister the protocol" | deposit and cite; report the registration link (ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility) |
Writing the response letter
- Point-by-point, quote-then-respond. Reproduce each comment, then state the change and where it lives (section/page/table).
- Coverage asks: concede and integrate. A missing literature is a real defect in a broad review; adding it strengthens the piece. The omitting author may be the referee who named it.
- Balance asks: show the steelman. Demonstrate the revised text states the other side at its strongest — and, for reform pieces, that criticized practices are steelmanned and claims are calibrated to evidence.
- Accuracy asks: fix exactly. Mischaracterizing a reviewed author who is your referee is the fastest route to a hostile second round; correct the wording precisely.
- Open-science asks: act, don't promise. Deposit the data/code and report the DOI/registration link in the letter; do not defer to acceptance.
- Disagree rarely and respectfully. If an ask would break the spine or bloat the piece beyond concision, explain the trade-off and propose an alternative, ideally pre-cleared with the editor.
- Track every addition's ripple. Adding a literature can shift the argument's center of gravity; after each integration re-check that the framework cells, the exhibits, and the balance audit still hold, and that the piece stays concise.
Show full SKILL.md (179 more words)Show less
Checklist
- Every comment triaged into a bucket (scope / coverage / balance / appraisal / framework / accessibility / open-science)
- Coverage gaps conceded and integrated into the right framework cell; saturation re-run
- Balance complaints answered by demonstrable steelmanning + self-citation / reform-calibration re-audit
- Mischaracterizations corrected precisely (reviewed authors may be the referees)
- "Annotated bibliography" asks answered by a stronger/explicit spine, not reordering
- Accessibility fixes add intuition / define jargon / state the claim earlier
- Open-science asks acted on (deposited + cited + registration link), not promised
- Point-by-point letter: quote-then-respond, with section/page/table locations
- Comprehensiveness + balance + concision re-checked after all additions
Anti-patterns
- Defending an omission rather than adding the missing literature (a coverage gap is a real defect)
- Answering a balance complaint with assertions of fairness instead of revised, steelmanned text
- Dismissing or re-mischaracterizing a reviewed author who is likely your referee
- "Fixing" an annotated-bibliography critique by shuffling paragraphs without imposing a spine
- Promising open data/code "on acceptance" instead of depositing it now
- Bloating scope to satisfy every "also cover…" until the perspective loses its spine and concision
- Trying to satisfy two contradictory reviewers instead of asking the editor to adjudicate
Output format
【Triage】each comment bucketed (scope/coverage/balance/appraisal/framework/accessibility/open-science)? Y/N
【Coverage gaps】conceded + integrated into framework cells; saturation re-run? Y/N
【Balance】steelman shown in revised text; self-citation + reform calibration re-audited? Y/N
【Appraisal fixes】mischaracterizations corrected precisely? Y/N
【Framework asks】spine strengthened/made explicit (not reordered)? Y/N
【Accessibility】intuition added; claim stated earlier? Y/N
【Open science】deposits done + cited; registration link reported? Y/N · N/A
【Letter】point-by-point, quote-then-respond, with locations? Y/N
【Next step】→ ppsych-submission (re-submit the revised perspective)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ppsych Revision next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ppsych Revision this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Bio Fragment AnalysisGPTomics/bioSkills | 1.2k | 1 repos | ~4.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Libreqos Review Subagents WorkflowLibreQoE/LibreQoS | 721 | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | GPL-2.0 | |
| Scenario MapOwl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills | 105 | — | ~568 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Core Components Code Reviewcore-ds/core-components | 137 | — | ~5.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Review ComponentEndava/BEEQ | 163 | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 |
Similar skills
Libreqos Review Subagents Workflow
LibreQoE/LibreQoS
Project workflow for invoking the local review sub-agents Thomas, Helen, Beck, Jonas, The Reaper, and Heckler during LibreQoS coding sessions.
Scenario Map
Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills
Map inclusive usage scenarios across ability spectrums for a product or feature.
Core Components Code Review
core-ds/core-components
Review a Pull Request or diff in the @alfalab/core-components UI library — correctness bugs, public API/breaking changes, accessibility, keyboard/focus/pointer interaction, component states…
Review Component
Endava/BEEQ
Review a BEEQ StencilJS component against design system guidelines and project standards.
Light Experiment Coding
Light0305/Light-skills
Builds the code for a frozen research experiment test-first, with leakage controls, seed handling and saved evidence so results can be rerun and audited.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Questions about Ppsych Revision
What does Ppsych Revision do?
A skill your agent uses when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks…. Ppsych Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps, balance/fairness complaints, framework/argument asks, accessibility, and open-science requests.
When should I use Ppsych Revision?
Ppsych Revision fits situations like: responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps; balance/fairness complaints; framework/argument asks; open-science requests.
How do I install Ppsych Revision in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ppsych-revision in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ppsych Revision in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ppsych-revision in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ppsych Revision in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-revision -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ppsych-revision, .gemini/skills/ppsych-revision, .github/skills/ppsych-revision and .opencode/skills/ppsych-revision in your project.
What does Ppsych Revision need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ppsych Revision is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ppsych Revision access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ppsych Revision safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ppsych Revision use?
Ppsych Revision is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ppsych Revision use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ppsych Revision?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ppsych Revision: Bio Fragment Analysis (GPTomics/bioSkills, 1.2k stars), Libreqos Review Subagents Workflow (LibreQoE/LibreQoS, 721 stars), Scenario Map (Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills, 105 stars) and Core Components Code Review (core-ds/core-components, 137 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ppsych Revision?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.