A skill your agent uses when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJ), writing delta-first…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Pods Related Work

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pods-related-work -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills pods-related-work --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/PODS-Skills/skills/pods-related-work .claude/skills/pods-related-work && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
pods-related-work
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
506 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJ), writing delta-first…

  • Positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS
  • SKILL.md covers Positioning checks, Database-theory literature lanes, Delta-first positioning vignette and Concurrent and prior-version…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • The journals (TODS

What it does

Pods Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJ), writing delta-first contrast that compares results rather than cataloging citations, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent, arXiv-preprint, and prior-version overlap.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Academic paper search, Literature review and Citation management. It works with arXiv. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS
  • The journals (TODS
  • Writing delta-first contrast that compares results rather than cataloging citations
  • Keeping self-citations double-anonymous

Example prompts

  • “/pods-related-work”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Pods Related Work loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 506 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~91
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 506 words, ~1,249 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/pods-related-work/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
pods-related-work
description
Use when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJ), writing delta-first contrast that compares results rather than cataloging citations, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent, arXiv-preprint, and prior-version overlap.

Use this to audit novelty and eligibility. PODS reviewers are close to the database-theory literature and expect to see exactly where your result sits relative to the nearest prior result — a comparison of theorems, not a list of papers. Reopen the current PODS call for the resubmission, anonymity, and prior-publication rules before advising authors.

Positioning checks

  • Separate the mathematical novelty from the effort. What is new: a bound that was open, a dichotomy that completes a partial classification, a semantics nobody had defined, a lower bound matching a known upper bound? Name the theorem-level delta.
  • Cover the theory lanes. PODS reviewers expect the database-theory venues and the relevant logic/complexity literature, not only the papers nearest your technique (see the table). A bibliography missing the obvious prior classification reads as unaware.
  • Write delta-first at the level of results. Each closely related paper gets one sentence naming what it proved and one naming how your result differs — a stronger bound, a broader class, a matching lower bound, a removed assumption. Compare theorems, do not summarize abstracts.
  • Preserve lightweight double-anonymity. Cite your own prior work in the third person and never link reviewers to an identity-revealing arXiv preprint, homepage, or named system.
  • Declare overlap with any prior conference/workshop version, an ICDT/journal version, or a concurrent submission; do not re-submit an already-published theorem as new.

Database-theory literature lanes

LaneTypical venuesWhat PODS reviewers check
Database theory (symposia)PODS, ICDTWhether the nearest prior bound/dichotomy/semantics is compared or subsumed
Logic & finite model theoryLICS, ICALP, CSLWhether the logical tools and expressiveness results are credited to origin
Complexity (when a bound rests on it)STOC, FOCS, CCCWhether the complexity-theoretic assumption (ETH, OMv, #P) is stated correctly
Theory journalsTODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJWhether the full/journal treatment of a topic is engaged, not just the extended abstract
Systems DB (when relevant)SIGMOD, VLDB, ICDEWhether a practically motivated problem's systems context is acknowledged

A bibliography that cites only your own thread of papers tells a reviewer the delta may be smaller than claimed; one that reaches ICDT, the logic venues, and the journal versions signals command of the field.

Show full SKILL.md (148 more words)Show less

Delta-first positioning vignette

Suppose the paper proves a dichotomy for a query-evaluation problem. Its nearest neighbors: an earlier paper giving tractability for a sub-class (positive, but not a classification), a hardness result for one specific query (negative, but isolated), and a journal survey conjecturing the boundary. The novelty sentence should name all three contrasts — a complete classification where the first had only a sub-class, a general lower bound where the second had one query, and a proof where the survey had a conjecture.

Concurrent and prior-version judgment calls

text
[Concurrent arXiv work]  cite neutrally, state the precise result-level difference, avoid
                         unverifiable priority claims; keep the citation double-anonymous
[Your ICDT/workshop ver] declare it; state what the PODS paper adds (a matching lower bound, the
                         general case, full proofs) beyond the earlier extended abstract
[Journal full version]   if a journal version exists or is in submission, disclose it; PODS is an
                         extended abstract venue and overlap must be stated
[Archival status unclear] declare the overlap in the submission rather than guessing a chair's reading

Eligibility red flags

  • Substantial overlap with a theorem already published by the same authors (self-plagiarism / double publication risk).
  • A "new" result that re-proves a known bound with a cosmetic change of model and no new consequence.
  • Citations exclusively to systems venues, signaling a paper that may be a systems result reframed without the theory a PODS reviewer expects.

Output format

text
[Eligibility] clear / needs declaration / risky
[Lanes covered] <db-theory / logic-FMT / complexity / journals / systems-when-relevant>
[Nearest 3 results] <prior result -> one-line theorem-level delta>
[Archival-overlap risk] <none / declare: which prior version>
[Novelty sentence] <PODS-ready contribution contrast against the nearest prior theorem>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in PODS-Skills/skills/pods-related-work of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Pods Related Work next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Pods Related Work compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Pods Related Work this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Systematic Literature Review Builderbytedance/deer-flow84k2 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Paper Research on arXivXiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code14k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Literature Review AgentAr9av/PaperOrchestra6791 repos~5.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Arxiv MCP Serverblazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server3.2k—~353Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Searches arXiv across many papers on one topic, extracts each paper's methodology and findings in parallel, and synthesizes a cited literature review.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Paper Research on arXiv

    XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code

    Searches arXiv, fetches metadata, generates BibTeX, downloads PDFs and finds citations and related papers using a bundled Python script.

    14k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review Agent

    Ar9av/PaperOrchestra

    Step 3 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). An agent skill from Ar9av/PaperOrchestra.

    679 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Arxiv MCP Server

    blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server

    A skill your agent uses when finding, comparing, reading, or monitoring arXiv papers, including requests for abstracts, citation graphs, original LaTeX, section-level technical details, or…

    3.2k GitHub stars~353 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Arxiv Paper Writer

    appautomaton/latex-arxiv-SKILL

    Write LaTeX ML/AI review articles for arXiv using the IEEEtran template and verified BibTeX citations.

    458 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 27 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Pods Related Work

What does Pods Related Work do?

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJ), writing delta-first…. Pods Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS, JACM, VLDBJ), writing delta-first contrast that compares results rather than cataloging citations, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent, arXiv-preprint, and prior-version overlap.

When should I use Pods Related Work?

Pods Related Work fits situations like: positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS; the journals (TODS; writing delta-first contrast that compares results rather than cataloging citations; keeping self-citations double-anonymous.

How do I install Pods Related Work in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pods-related-work -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (PODS-Skills/skills/pods-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/pods-related-work in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Pods Related Work in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pods-related-work -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (PODS-Skills/skills/pods-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/pods-related-work in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Pods Related Work in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pods-related-work -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/pods-related-work, .gemini/skills/pods-related-work, .github/skills/pods-related-work and .opencode/skills/pods-related-work in your project.

What does Pods Related Work need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Pods Related Work is instructions for the agent only.

Does Pods Related Work access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Pods Related Work safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Pods Related Work use?

Pods Related Work is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Pods Related Work use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Pods Related Work?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Pods Related Work: Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars), Systematic Literature Review Builder (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Paper Research on arXiv (XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code, 14k stars) and Literature Review Agent (Ar9av/PaperOrchestra, 679 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Pods Related Work?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.