A skill your agent uses when hardening a PLDI paper's measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline, variance and confidence reporting…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Pldi Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills pldi-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-reproducibility .claude/skills/pldi-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
pldi-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1k tokens
SKILL.md length
396 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when hardening a PLDI paper's measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline, variance and confidence reporting…

  • Hardening a PLDI papers measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline
  • SKILL.md covers Checklist, translated to PL…, The measurement sins PLDI…, A protocol worth writing down and Compile-time and memory are…, plus 2 more sections
  • Calls python3
  • Variance and confidence reporting

What it does

Pldi Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when hardening a PLDI paper's measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline, variance and confidence reporting, principled benchmark choice, pinned toolchains, cross-platform validity, and a measurement log that survives artifact evaluation.

Its SKILL.md is about 1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Hardening a PLDI papers measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline
  • Variance and confidence reporting
  • Principled benchmark choice
  • Pinned toolchains

Example prompts

  • “/pldi-reproducibility”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python3

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Pldi Reproducibility loads about 1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 81 tokens; SKILL.md has 396 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~81
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 396 words, ~1,048 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/pldi-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
pldi-reproducibility
description
Use when hardening a PLDI paper's measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline, variance and confidence reporting, principled benchmark choice, pinned toolchains, cross-platform validity, and a measurement log that survives artifact evaluation.

PLDI Reproducibility

PLDI's methodological yardstick is written down: the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines and their one-page checklist (Blackburn, Hauswirth, Berger, Hicks, Krishnamurthi, 2018; sigplan.org/Resources/EmpiricalEvaluation/, read 2026-07-08). Reviewers and artifact evaluators both reach for it. This skill turns the checklist into compiler-bench practice; pldi-experiments covers what to measure, this covers whether anyone can trust and repeat the measurement.

Checklist, translated to PL systems

Guideline itemWhat it means for a compiler/runtime paper
Clearly stated claims"1.17x geomean on suite S vs baseline B at -O2" — never "significant speedups"
Suitable comparisonThe strongest sensible baseline configuration, tuned as its authors intend
Principled benchmark choiceThe suite is justified; exclusions are listed with reasons, not silently dropped
Adequate data analysisRepetitions, variance, and an aggregation rule (geomean for ratios) stated in the paper

The measurement sins PLDI reviewers hunt

  • No warmup discipline. JIT-compiled and cache-sensitive workloads need documented warmup iterations before timed runs; AOT binaries still need file-cache and frequency-scaling control. Say which regime you measured — steady-state and cold-start are different claims.
  • Single-run numbers. Report repetitions (dozens, not three), dispersion (confidence intervals or at least min/max), and never present a 2% delta inside the noise band as an improvement.
  • One machine, universal claim. A locality optimization can invert between microarchitectures. Two platforms with differing cache hierarchies is the floor for a general performance claim; otherwise scope the claim to the measured machine.
  • Unpinned toolchains. "GCC" is not a baseline; "GCC 14.2, -O2, glibc 2.39, Ubuntu 24.04, governor=performance" is.
  • Benchmark survivorship. Excluding the programs your technique fails on, without saying so, is the most damaging silent choice in a PL evaluation.
Show full SKILL.md (129 more words)Show less

A protocol worth writing down

Keep the protocol in the repository, executed by machine, so paper and artifact cannot diverge:

bash
# protocol.sh — executed, not described
set -euo pipefail
lscpu > results/env/cpu.txt; uname -a > results/env/os.txt
cc --version > results/env/toolchain.txt
for b in $(cat benchmarks/suite.list); do
  for i in $(seq 1 5);  do ./run.sh "$b" >/dev/null; done      # warmup
  for i in $(seq 1 30); do ./run.sh "$b" >> "results/raw/$b.csv"; done
done
python3 scripts/aggregate.py --stat geomean --ci 95 results/raw/

Log the environment beside the numbers: CPU model, frequency-scaling governor, ASLR setting, load conditions. When a reviewer's rerun differs from yours, the environment log is what turns a dispute into a diagnosis.

Compile-time and memory are claims too

If the paper claims low compile-time overhead or memory neutrality, those numbers need the same repetitions-and-variance treatment as speedups. A "under 3% overhead" sentence backed by one timed build is the soft spot response-phase reviewers press hardest.

Tie-in to badges

Everything above lands in the artifact (pldi-artifact-evaluation): the executed protocol becomes reproduce_all.sh, the environment log becomes results/env/, and the suite-choice justification becomes benchmarks/README. Reproducibility retrofitted after acceptance always shows.

Output format

text
[Guidelines pass] claims / comparison / benchmark choice / analysis — each ok?
[Warmup regime] documented? steady-state vs cold-start stated?
[Variance] runs per data point, CI method, noise floor vs claimed delta
[Platforms] n machines; claim scoped accordingly?
[Pinning + log] toolchain versions, flags, environment captured in repo?

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Pldi Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Pldi Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Pldi Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Pldi Reproducibility

What does Pldi Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when hardening a PLDI paper's measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline, variance and confidence reporting…. Pldi Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when hardening a PLDI paper's measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline, variance and confidence reporting, principled benchmark choice, pinned toolchains, cross-platform validity, and a measurement log that survives artifact evaluation.

When should I use Pldi Reproducibility?

Pldi Reproducibility fits situations like: hardening a PLDI papers measurements against the SIGPLAN Empirical Evaluation Guidelines — warmup and steady-state discipline; variance and confidence reporting; principled benchmark choice; pinned toolchains.

How do I install Pldi Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/pldi-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Pldi Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/pldi-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Pldi Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/pldi-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/pldi-reproducibility, .github/skills/pldi-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/pldi-reproducibility in your project.

What does Pldi Reproducibility need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Pldi Reproducibility needs the command-line tools its instructions call (python3). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Pldi Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Pldi Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Pldi Reproducibility use?

Pldi Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Pldi Reproducibility use?

About 1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Pldi Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Pldi Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Pldi Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.