A skill your agent uses when revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page, cross-subject claims stated precisely, a limitations section that argues rather…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Percom Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill percom-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills percom-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/PerCom-Skills/skills/percom-writing-style .claude/skills/percom-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
percom-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
565 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page, cross-subject claims stated precisely, a limitations section that argues rather…

  • Revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page
  • SKILL.md covers Revision rules, Ubicomp paper skeleton, Sentence-level rewrites and Cross-subject and metric…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Cross-subject claims stated precisely

What it does

Percom Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page, cross-subject claims stated precisely, a limitations section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim, double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the tight IEEEtran 9-page budget.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page
  • Cross-subject claims stated precisely
  • A limitations section that argues rather than recites
  • Evidence proportional to the claim

Example prompts

  • “/percom-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Percom Writing Style loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 565 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~82
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 565 words, ~1,337 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/percom-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
percom-writing-style
description
Use when revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page, cross-subject claims stated precisely, a limitations section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim, double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the tight IEEEtran 9-page budget.

PerCom Writing Style

Use this when revising the main paper. PerCom papers are IEEE Xplore proceedings read by ubicomp reviewers, so they need a pervasive-computing contribution stated in the first page and evidence a reviewer trusts on people they did not train on. The failure this skill prevents is a technically fine paper that reads like an ML result with a wearable title glued on, or a systems demo with no human at its center.

Revision rules

  • Lead with the ubicomp contribution: the problem a real user or deployment faces, why current sensing is inadequate, the contribution (system and/or finding), the evidence, and what changes for pervasive computing.
  • State claims at the right granularity. A recognition claim must say cross-subject or within-subject, on what population, with which metric. "97% accuracy" without a split or a class balance is a red flag to a PerCom reviewer, not a headline.
  • Pair every claim with proportional evidence — real subjects, a fair baseline, F1 with confidence intervals on realistic class balance, deployment realism — not adjectives.
  • Argue limitations; do not recite them. Name the external, construct, and generalization limits that actually bite this study (subject diversity, ground-truth quality, lab vs. free-living), and say what you did to bound each. A boilerplate limitations paragraph tells a reviewer you have not stressed your own claims.
  • Respect the 9-page budget as a design constraint, not a formatting afterthought — IEEEtran two-column is tight, and a study that only fits by shrinking the evaluation or limitations is over-scoped. Recover space editorially, never by touching the template.
  • Maintain double-blindness in self-citations (third person), testbed and system names, dataset links, acknowledgements, and funding.

Ubicomp paper skeleton

SectionJob it must doCommon failure
IntroProblem, inadequacy, contribution, evidence preview, ubicomp payoff — first pageLeads with a technology trend, not a real-use problem
Background/MotivationWhy a user or deployment needs this nowMotivation by assertion, no grounding in practice
System / Study designThe technique or the study + sensing protocol, reproduciblyMethod or sensor setup described too thinly to re-run
EvaluationEach claim answered with cross-subject, proportional evidenceWithin-subject or pooled-accuracy metrics that flatter the result
LimitationsThe limits that bite, each boundedGeneric list untethered from this study's subjects/sensors
Related workDelta-first positioning against the ubicomp literatureCatalog of citations with no contrast
Show full SKILL.md (185 more words)Show less

Sentence-level rewrites

Draft patternPerCom-safe rewrite
"Our system achieves 97% accuracy.""leave-one-subject-out F1 of 0.xx (95% CI ...) on <N> participants"
"We evaluate on a large dataset.""We evaluate on <N> participants over <duration> of free-living data, released as a dataset"
"Results show our approach works well.""cross-subject F1 improves by X over <baseline>; per-subject variance in Fig. 3"
"State-of-the-art performance."Claim scoped to the subjects, sensors, and setting actually tested
"The model recognizes activities.""the recognizer reaches F1 0.xx on held-out subjects for <activity set>"

Cross-subject and metric discipline

text
[Split]      state within-subject vs. leave-one-subject-out (or session-out); PerCom default is cross-subject
[Balance]    report class balance; on imbalanced activities use F1 (macro + per-class), not raw accuracy
[Event vs frame] say whether metrics are frame-level or event-level; they can differ sharply
[Realism]    lab vs. free-living; scripted vs. spontaneous behavior -- name which you tested
-> for each: state the choice next to the number so a reviewer is not left guessing

Vignette: compressing an over-length study into 9 pages

A draft with three activity classes, nine figures, and a sprawling background: keep the cross-subject headline result, the two figures that carry it, a per-class F1 table, and a limitations subsection tied to subject diversity and ground truth; move per-subject breakdowns and extra ablations to the dataset with explicit forward references; cut background to what the argument needs. The test of a good cut: a reviewer should be able to answer "does it work on a new person, and what threatens that?" from the body alone.

Output format

text
[Writing diagnosis] clear / under-motivated / over-claimed / within-subject-only / over-scoped
[First-page fix] <new framing leading with the pervasive-computing contribution>
[Claim audit] <claim -> split (LOSO?) -> metric (F1?) -> where answered -> proportional? yes/no>
[Limitations fix] <limit that bites -> bounding to add, placed by the result>
[Anonymity edits] <system names / self-citations / dataset links to rewrite>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in PerCom-Skills/skills/percom-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Percom Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Percom Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Percom Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Percom Writing Style

What does Percom Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page, cross-subject claims stated precisely, a limitations section that argues rather…. Percom Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page, cross-subject claims stated precisely, a limitations section that argues rather than recites, evidence proportional to the claim, double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the tight IEEEtran 9-page budget.

When should I use Percom Writing Style?

Percom Writing Style fits situations like: revising an IEEE PerCom paper for a pervasive-computing contribution on the first page; cross-subject claims stated precisely; A limitations section that argues rather than recites; evidence proportional to the claim.

How do I install Percom Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill percom-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (PerCom-Skills/skills/percom-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/percom-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Percom Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill percom-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (PerCom-Skills/skills/percom-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/percom-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Percom Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill percom-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/percom-writing-style, .gemini/skills/percom-writing-style, .github/skills/percom-writing-style and .opencode/skills/percom-writing-style in your project.

What does Percom Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Percom Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Percom Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Percom Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Percom Writing Style use?

Percom Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Percom Writing Style use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Percom Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Percom Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Percom Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.