A skill your agent uses when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative…

MITAuto-check passedData & Analytics

Install Orgstud Data Analysis

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-data-analysis -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-data-analysis --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-data-analysis .claude/skills/orgstud-data-analysis && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
orgstud-data-analysis
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
710 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative…

  • Executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, OS expects readers to see how…, Branch A — Qualitative… and Branch B — Process analysis…, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Process analysis

What it does

Orgstud Data Analysis is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see orgstud-methods).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Data & Analytics, covering Data analysis. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder
  • Process analysis
  • Quantitative estimation and robustness

Example prompts

  • “/orgstud-data-analysis”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Orgstud Data Analysis loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 81 tokens; SKILL.md has 710 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~81
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 710 words, ~1,622 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/orgstud-data-analysis/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
orgstud-data-analysis
description
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see orgstud-methods).

Data Analysis & Evidence (orgstud-data-analysis)

When to trigger

  • You have data but the path from raw material to theory is opaque
  • Qualitative: your quotes are decorative, not evidentiary; the coding is undocumented
  • Process: you have events but no visible analytic structure turning them into a model
  • Quantitative: main results exist but robustness and alternative explanations are thin
  • A reviewer asks "how did you get from your data to these constructs?"

OS expects readers to see how data became theory

OS's interpretive, European tradition makes analytic transparency a first-class criterion — qualitative rigor is judged on its own terms, not against a quantitative yardstick. The reader must be able to audit the inference from raw data to theoretical claim. Make the analytic ladder visible.

Branch A — Qualitative analysis (the data-to-theory ladder)

  • Transparent coding. Show first-order codes (informant terms), second-order themes (researcher constructs), and aggregate dimensions — the Gioia data structure — or an equivalent (Eisenhardt cross-case tables, Langley process bracketing). State who coded, how disagreements were resolved, and how iteration with theory proceeded.
  • Data-to-theory table. A table linking representative raw evidence → codes → constructs, so the inference is auditable (build it with orgstud-tables-figures).
  • Power quotes vs. proof quotes. A few vivid "power quotes" in the body carry the argument; corroborating "proof quotes" sit in tables/appendix. Quotes must carry the claim, not illustrate a conclusion reached elsewhere.
  • Evidence for each construct. Every construct backed by patterned evidence across informants/cases, with prevalence where appropriate.
  • Negative cases. Report disconfirming instances and how they refined the theory — central to trustworthiness at OS.
  • Process display. For process theory, show the temporal/event structure (timeline, phase model, visual mapping); make the transitions between phases analytically explicit, not just narrated.

Branch B — Process analysis (when the contribution is a process model)

  • Choose a process strategy explicitly: narrative, temporal bracketing, visual mapping, grounded theory, or alternate templates (Langley). Say why it fits.
  • Identify events, sequences, and turning points; show what triggers each transition and what each phase accomplishes that the prior could not.
  • Distinguish real-time from retrospective data and address the recall/hindsight risks of each.
  • The output is a process model figure plus the analytic account that earns it.

Branch C — Quantitative analysis

  • Main models match the design (FE/RE, event-history, multilevel, network); standard errors clustered at the right level.
  • Robustness that targets the theory's threats — alternative measures, samples, specifications, endogeneity checks, modern staggered-DiD diagnostics if relevant — not a wall of tables that never address the real threat.
  • Mechanism evidence. Don't stop at the reduced-form relationship; probe why (mediation/moderation or supplementary tests).
  • Effect interpretation in organizational terms — magnitudes, not just significance.
Show full SKILL.md (285 more words)Show less

Either branch — the "so what" of the evidence

  • Tie every analytic result back to the mechanism and the theoretical puzzle.
  • Distinguish what the data can and cannot establish — overclaiming is a fast OS rejection.
  • Prepare exhibits jointly with orgstud-tables-figures.

Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)

Run the battery, don't just enumerate it. Full map: execution-with-mcp. Organization Studies is largely qualitative/theoretical; use the chain below only for its quantitative-empirical papers, and say so when a study is interpretive.

  • Many outcomes / specifications: romano_wolf (step-down FWER) or benjamini_hochberg — report the adjusted threshold.
  • OVB sensitivity: oster_delta / sensemakr.
  • Inference: wild_cluster_bootstrap (few clusters), twoway_cluster / conley; multilevel data → cluster at the right level.
  • Re-fit off one handle: audit_result(result_id) lists the missing checks and the exact suggest_function for each.
  • Exhibits: etable / did_summary_to_latex from the handle — no retyped numbers.

Keep the decisive checks in the body and the exhaustive battery in the appendix. See the executed chain in the JF execution walkthrough.

Checklist

  • Qual: data structure (first-order → second-order → dimensions) documented
  • Qual: a data-to-theory / evidence table built; quotes carry (not decorate) claims
  • Qual: negative cases reported and used to refine the theory
  • Process: process strategy named; turning points and transitions made explicit
  • Quant: SEs clustered appropriately; robustness targets the theory's threats; magnitudes interpreted
  • Mechanism is probed, not just the headline relationship
  • Claims are matched to what the evidence can actually support

Anti-patterns

  • "Anecdotal" qualitative work: cherry-picked quotes with no coding transparency
  • Quotes that illustrate a pre-set conclusion rather than generating/supporting it
  • A process "model" that is really a narrative with no analytic structure or transition logic
  • Robustness theater: many tables that never address the real identification threat
  • Reporting significance with no interpretation of organizational magnitude
  • Overclaiming causality or generalizability beyond what the design supports

Output format

text
【Branch】qualitative / process / quantitative
【Data-to-theory link】data structure / process strategy / mechanism tests done
【Key evidence】power quotes, the process model, or main estimates
【Trustworthiness/robustness】checks completed + gaps (negative cases, clustering, alt explanations)
【What evidence cannot show】explicit limits
【Next skill】orgstud-contribution-framing

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-data-analysis of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Orgstud Data Analysis next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Orgstud Data Analysis compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Orgstud Data Analysis this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Exploratory Data Analysisspacering-net/codeg3.8k15 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Excel and CSV Data Analysisbytedance/deer-flow83k4 repos~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Exploratory Data AnalysisOleafly/Oleafly2052 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Python Executorcortega26/chile-hub1132 repos~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Agentic Kaggle WorkflowFrankS-IntelLab/agentic-kaggle-skill188—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Exploratory Data Analysis

    spacering-net/codeg

    Perform comprehensive exploratory data analysis on scientific data files across 200+ file formats.

    3.8k GitHub starsUsed in 15 repos~3.6k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Excel and CSV Data Analysis

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Analyzes uploaded Excel and CSV files with SQL through DuckDB, producing schema inspections, statistical summaries and exports to CSV, JSON or Markdown.

    83k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~2.2k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files.

    205 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.4k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check: notes
  • Python Executor

    cortega26/chile-hub

    Execute Python code in a safe sandboxed environment via [inference.sh](https://inference.sh).

    113 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.5k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Agentic Kaggle Workflow

    FrankS-IntelLab/agentic-kaggle-skill

    Takes a Kaggle competition from rules and validation design through baselines, ensembling and notebook architecture to a scored submission.

    188 GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Yichen Wecom Local Vault

    mcncarl/yichen-skills

    Read, decrypt, query, search, and export local WeCom/企业微信 5.x desktop databases on macOS into a private read-only vault.

    4.3k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Orgstud Data Analysis

What does Orgstud Data Analysis do?

A skill your agent uses when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative…. Orgstud Data Analysis is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative estimation and robustness.

When should I use Orgstud Data Analysis?

Orgstud Data Analysis fits situations like: executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder; process analysis; quantitative estimation and robustness.

How do I install Orgstud Data Analysis in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-data-analysis -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-data-analysis in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/orgstud-data-analysis in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Orgstud Data Analysis in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-data-analysis -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-data-analysis in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/orgstud-data-analysis in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Orgstud Data Analysis in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-data-analysis -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/orgstud-data-analysis, .gemini/skills/orgstud-data-analysis, .github/skills/orgstud-data-analysis and .opencode/skills/orgstud-data-analysis in your project.

What does Orgstud Data Analysis need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Orgstud Data Analysis is instructions for the agent only.

Does Orgstud Data Analysis access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Orgstud Data Analysis safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Orgstud Data Analysis use?

Orgstud Data Analysis is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Orgstud Data Analysis use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Orgstud Data Analysis?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Orgstud Data Analysis: Exploratory Data Analysis (spacering-net/codeg, 3.8k stars), Excel and CSV Data Analysis (bytedance/deer-flow, 83k stars), Exploratory Data Analysis (Oleafly/Oleafly, 205 stars) and Python Executor (cortega26/chile-hub, 113 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Orgstud Data Analysis?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,216 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.