Agent skill

Orgstud Contribution Framing

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Orgstud Contribution Framing

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-contribution-framing -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing .claude/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
orgstud-contribution-framing
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
663 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it.

  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, At OS, the contribution is a…, Calibrating the size of the… and Where the contribution must…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Orgstud Contribution Framing is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it. Frames the contribution; it does not build the theory (see orgstud-theory-development) or run analysis.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

Example prompts

  • “/orgstud-contribution-framing”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Orgstud Contribution Framing loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 71 tokens; SKILL.md has 663 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~71
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 663 words, ~1,354 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
orgstud-contribution-framing
description
Use when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it. Frames the contribution; it does not build the theory (see orgstud-theory-development) or run analysis.

Contribution Framing (orgstud-contribution-framing)

When to trigger

  • The theory and evidence are settled but the paper cannot say its contribution in one sentence
  • The intro lists findings rather than a theoretical move; the discussion restates results
  • A reviewer says "I don't see the contribution," "this is incremental," or "what does this add to theory?"
  • The contribution is described as a finding ("we find X") rather than a usable theoretical move

At OS, the contribution is a theoretical move others can use

The single most important sentence in an OS paper is: "We contribute to [conversation] by [the theoretical move], which shows that [the new understanding]." The move must be something a reader elsewhere can pick up and apply — a new mechanism, a reconceptualized construct, a process model, a resolved tension, a boundary that wasn't seen. A finding is not a contribution; a finding plus what it changes in how we theorize organizing is.

OS distinguishes sharply between empirical contribution ("we found this happens") and theoretical contribution ("this changes how the field should think"). OS desk-rejects papers whose contribution is only the former. Frame the move at the level of the theory, then use the evidence as warrant.

Calibrating the size of the claim

Claim typeOS verdictFix
"First study of X in setting Y"weak (empirical novelty only)Reframe as a theoretical move the setting enabled
"We extend theory T to context C"risky (often incremental)Specify what about C forces an amendment to T
"We reconceptualize construct K"strong if earnedShow a puzzle that dissolves under the new conception
"We theorize a new process/mechanism M"strongState M's logic and a non-obvious implication
"We bridge conversations A and B"strong if usableGive the bridge a name and show what it newly explains

Avoid both under- and over-claiming. Under-claiming buries a real move under hedges; over-claiming ("we overturn institutional theory") invites reviewers to find the move smaller than advertised. Match the claim to exactly what the mechanism and evidence support (orgstud-data-analysis sets that ceiling).

Where the contribution must appear

  • Abstract — the move stated plainly within the 300-word unstructured limit.
  • Intro — the puzzle, why existing theory fails, and the one-sentence contribution, landed on the first page or two.
  • Discussion — the contribution developed: implications for the conversation, boundary conditions, and what new questions it opens (generativity, not a findings recap).
  • The same move should read consistently across all three; drift between abstract, intro, and discussion is a common reviewer flag.
Show full SKILL.md (253 more words)Show less

Checklist

  • The contribution fits the sentence "We contribute to [conversation] by [move], showing [new understanding]"
  • It is a theoretical move others can use, not just a finding or an empirical first
  • The claim size matches what the mechanism + evidence support (no under/over-claiming)
  • The move is stated consistently across abstract, intro, and discussion
  • The discussion develops the contribution and opens questions, rather than restating results
  • Boundary conditions and scope of the contribution are explicit
  • The framing is unmistakably OS (theory-first), not an empirical-journal framing

Anti-patterns

  • "Contribution" stated as a finding or as empirical novelty ("first study of...")
  • Burying a real theoretical move under hedges and qualifications
  • Over-claiming relative to the evidence — inviting reviewers to shrink the contribution
  • A discussion that recaps results instead of developing the theoretical move
  • Abstract/intro/discussion describing three subtly different contributions
  • Framing that would suit AMJ/Org Science empirics rather than OS theory

Referee pushback mapped to the framing fix

  • "I don't see the contribution." → The intro states findings, not a move. Rewrite the contribution sentence at the level of the theory and put it on page one or two.
  • "This is incremental / well-known." → The claim is an extension, not a reconceptualization. Show what about your case forces an amendment the prior account cannot make.
  • "The contribution is overstated." → The claim exceeds the evidence ceiling. Pull it back to exactly what the mechanism supports (orgstud-data-analysis sets that ceiling).
  • "The discussion just repeats the results." → Develop the move instead: implications for the conversation, boundary conditions, and the new questions it opens.

Output format

text
【Contribution sentence】We contribute to [conversation] by [move], showing [new understanding]
【Move type】new mechanism / reconceptualization / process model / resolved tension / bridge
【Claim calibration】matched to evidence ceiling? (under / right / over)
【Where stated】abstract / intro / discussion — consistent? (Y/N)
【Generativity】the new questions it opens
【Next skill】orgstud-tables-figures

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Orgstud Contribution Framing next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Orgstud Contribution Framing compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Orgstud Contribution Framing this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Contributemindfold-ai/Trellis15k—~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Contributesuperset-sh/superset15k—~624Automated safety check: PassCustom licence
Study Plananthropics/claude-for-legal9.6k3 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Contributingkortix-ai/suna20k1 repos~3kAutomated safety check: WarnCustom licence
Frame Titlethedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~438Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Contribute

    mindfold-ai/Trellis

    Guide for contributing to Trellis documentation and marketplace.

    15k GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 9 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Contribute

    superset-sh/superset

    Set up a Superset open-source contribution, from forking and cloning superset-sh/superset through local dev setup and the repo's rules to a merge-ready PR.

    15k GitHub stars~624 tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Study Plan

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Build or update a long-term bar prep (or exam prep) study plan — phases, subjects weighted by weakness, daily session schedule, adaptive to session history in study-plan.yaml.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.5k tokens
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Contributing

    kortix-ai/suna

    The pull request loop for this repo: branch → commit → verify in your own box (local tests + local stack) → PR into main → demo video recorded with agent-browser on the local stack → gh --attach →…

    20k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check: warnings
  • Frame Title

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide titles for iframes and frames.

    74k GitHub stars~438 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Academic Language Sentence Frame Generator

    GarethManning/education-agent-skills

    Generate tiered sentence frames for academic tasks that scaffold language production across proficiency levels.

    835 GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    EducationAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Orgstud Contribution Framing

What does Orgstud Contribution Framing do?

A skill your agent uses when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it. Orgstud Contribution Framing is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when sharpening the one-sentence theoretical contribution of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript and the intro/discussion claims that carry it.

How do I install Orgstud Contribution Framing in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-contribution-framing -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Orgstud Contribution Framing in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-contribution-framing -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Orgstud Contribution Framing in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-contribution-framing -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing, .gemini/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing, .github/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing and .opencode/skills/orgstud-contribution-framing in your project.

What does Orgstud Contribution Framing need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Orgstud Contribution Framing is instructions for the agent only.

Does Orgstud Contribution Framing access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Orgstud Contribution Framing safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Orgstud Contribution Framing use?

Orgstud Contribution Framing is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Orgstud Contribution Framing use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Orgstud Contribution Framing?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Orgstud Contribution Framing: Contribute (mindfold-ai/Trellis, 15k stars), Contribute (superset-sh/superset, 15k stars), Study Plan (anthropics/claude-for-legal, 9.6k stars) and Contributing (kortix-ai/suna, 20k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Orgstud Contribution Framing?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.