Agent skill

Oopsla Topic Selection

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design, implementation, formalism, or empirical study — and routing within the…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Oopsla Topic Selection

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill oopsla-topic-selection -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills oopsla-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/OOPSLA-Skills/skills/oopsla-topic-selection .claude/skills/oopsla-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
oopsla-topic-selection
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
456 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design, implementation, formalism, or empirical study — and routing within the…

  • Judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design
  • SKILL.md covers The center-of-mass test, Signals the project is…, Signals to route away and Two-round consequence for…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Empirical study — and routing within the SIGPLAN family from OOPSLAs seat: POPL for theory-first

What it does

Oopsla Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design, implementation, formalism, or empirical study — and routing within the SIGPLAN family from OOPSLA's seat: POPL for theory-first, PLDI for implementation-performance, ICFP for functional, Onward! for vision, ECOOP, or SE venues.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design
  • Empirical study — and routing within the SIGPLAN family from OOPSLAs seat: POPL for theory-first
  • PLDI for implementation-performance
  • ICFP for functional

Example prompts

  • “/oopsla-topic-selection”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Oopsla Topic Selection loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 88 tokens; SKILL.md has 456 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~88
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 456 words, ~1,107 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/oopsla-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
oopsla-topic-selection
description
Use when judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design, implementation, formalism, or empirical study — and routing within the SIGPLAN family from OOPSLA's seat: POPL for theory-first, PLDI for implementation-performance, ICFP for functional, Onward! for vision, ECOOP, or SE venues.

OOPSLA Topic Selection

OOPSLA is the broadest seat at the SIGPLAN table: its published scope covers programming languages "from design to implementation and from mathematical formalisms to empirical studies," and its verified exemplars include a benchmark suite, a measurement-methodology critique, a corpus/survey study, a soundness counterexample, a language experience report, and a formalized runtime mechanism (resources/exemplars/library.md). The routing question is therefore rarely "is this PL?" but "is OOPSLA's breadth the asset, or would a narrower sibling reward this paper's center of mass more?"

The center-of-mass test

State the one sentence a reviewer would repeat to the committee. Route on what that sentence is about:

The sentence is about...First-choice venueOOPSLA case exists when...
A metatheoretic result, calculus, logicPOPLThe formalism explains a deployed mechanism or design choice
Compiler/runtime performance engineeringPLDIThe insight is the design trade-off, not the speedup
Typed/functional language techniqueICFPThe audience is OO/imperative/multi-paradigm practice
A provocative vision without full evidenceOnward! (same SPLASH building)Evidence has matured past position-paper strength
OO language design, European communityECOOP (AITO, not PACMPL)PACMPL journal publication or the SPLASH audience matters
Testing/analysis practice at SE scaleISSTA / ICSE / FSEThe finding changes how languages are designed, not just tools
Human factors of programmingCHI or OOPSLA's human-aspects laneThe methodology meets study-design scrutiny (oopsla-experiments)

Signals the project is genuinely OOPSLA-shaped

  • The contribution couples layers — a semantics plus its implementation consequences, a design plus the empirical study of its use — rather than living purely in one.
  • The paper would still matter if a competing implementation shipped: the claim is about the design space, not the artifact's existence.
  • Experience and applications carry analysis: OOPSLA has a real lane for "we built and deployed it; here is what generalizes" (the Julia paper is the model), which PLDI/POPL reward less.
  • Empirical questions about programs and programmers at scale — adoption, API misuse, bug taxonomies — with instrument-grade methodology.
Show full SKILL.md (141 more words)Show less

Signals to route away

  • The evaluation is the contribution and it's a speedup: PLDI's benchmark-first culture is the better courtroom.
  • The theorem stands alone without an implementation story: POPL.
  • The idea needs permission to be speculative: Onward!, and return to OOPSLA a volume later with evidence — a deliberate SPLASH-internal pipeline.
  • The novelty is a product description: no SIGPLAN venue; consider an industry track or experience venue outside the family.

Two-round consequence for routing

Because OOPSLA offers two doors a year with a revision system, it is often the fastest family member from "solid evidence" to "published journal article" — a legitimate tiebreaker when a paper fits two venues. It is a bad reason to submit work whose center of mass is elsewhere: family reviewer pools overlap heavily, and a misrouted paper burns goodwill you will meet again (oopsla-review-process).

Decision procedure

text
1. Write the one-sentence claim; identify its center of mass (table above)
2. Check exemplar precedent: which library entry shape matches?  none → doubt
3. Ask the coupling question: does the paper bridge ≥2 layers?  no → sibling
4. Verify current scope text on the live track page (topics drift by volume)
5. Commit to a round (oopsla-workflow) or a re-route with a named venue

Output format

text
[Center of mass] <one sentence + layer(s) it lives in>
[Routing] OOPSLA / POPL / PLDI / ICFP / Onward! / ECOOP / SE venue / other
[Precedent] exemplar shape matched, or none
[Fit risk] the objection the committee would raise
[Commitment] target round or re-route action

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in OOPSLA-Skills/skills/oopsla-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Oopsla Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Oopsla Topic Selection compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Oopsla Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
JudgeNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.7k—~2kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
Do And JudgeNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.7k—~14kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
TopicsZimoLiao/scholaraio576—~294Automated safety check: PassMIT
Topic Modelingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.5k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Add Shape Inferenceonnx/onnx22k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Judge

    NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

    Launch a meta-judge then a judge sub-agent to evaluate results produced in the current conversation

    1.7k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Do And Judge

    NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

    Execute a task with sub-agent implementation and LLM-as-a-judge verification with automatic retry loop

    1.7k GitHub stars~14k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Topics

    ZimoLiao/scholaraio

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks about research themes, topic distribution, BERTopic clustering, topic overview, topic papers, topic merges, or HTML topic visualizations.

    576 GitHub stars~294 tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Topic Modeling

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Structural topic modeling: STM spec, topic count, coherence-exclusivity.

    4.5k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Add or update type and shape inference for an ONNX operator.

    22k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Bestblogs Topic

    ginobefun/BestBlogs

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks about a specific topic, subject area, or wants to explore curated topic pages on BestBlogs.

    4k GitHub stars~670 tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Oopsla Topic Selection

What does Oopsla Topic Selection do?

A skill your agent uses when judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design, implementation, formalism, or empirical study — and routing within the…. Oopsla Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design, implementation, formalism, or empirical study — and routing within the SIGPLAN family from OOPSLA's seat: POPL for theory-first, PLDI for implementation-performance, ICFP for functional, Onward!

When should I use Oopsla Topic Selection?

Oopsla Topic Selection fits situations like: judging whether a project is OOPSLA-shaped — a PL contribution whose evidence spans design; empirical study — and routing within the SIGPLAN family from OOPSLAs seat: POPL for theory-first; PLDI for implementation-performance; ICFP for functional.

How do I install Oopsla Topic Selection in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill oopsla-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (OOPSLA-Skills/skills/oopsla-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/oopsla-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Oopsla Topic Selection in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill oopsla-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (OOPSLA-Skills/skills/oopsla-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/oopsla-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Oopsla Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill oopsla-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/oopsla-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/oopsla-topic-selection, .github/skills/oopsla-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/oopsla-topic-selection in your project.

What does Oopsla Topic Selection need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Oopsla Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.

Does Oopsla Topic Selection access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Oopsla Topic Selection safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Oopsla Topic Selection use?

Oopsla Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Oopsla Topic Selection use?

About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Oopsla Topic Selection?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Oopsla Topic Selection: Judge (NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit, 1.7k stars), Do And Judge (NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit, 1.7k stars), Topics (ZimoLiao/scholaraio, 576 stars) and Topic Modeling (brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, 4.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Oopsla Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.