A skill your agent uses when targeting Mind or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Mind

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mind -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills mind --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/mind .claude/skills/mind && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
mind
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
751 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when targeting Mind or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.

  • Deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue
  • SKILL.md covers Journal positioning, When to trigger, Scope & topic fit and Method & evidence bar, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Mind is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when targeting Mind or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as a leading generalist journal in the analytic/UK tradition, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style (full-length articles plus critical notices) and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue

Example prompts

  • “/mind”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Mind loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 101 tokens; SKILL.md has 751 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~101
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 751 words, ~1,703 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/mind/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
mind
description
Use when targeting Mind or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as a leading generalist journal in the analytic/UK tradition, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style (full-length articles plus critical notices) and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

Mind (mind)

Journal positioning

Mind, published by Oxford University Press for the Mind Association, is a leading generalist journal in the analytic tradition with deep roots in the UK philosophical scene and a long historical strength in philosophy of mind, language, and logic, alongside metaphysics, epistemology, and value theory. Its defining expectation is a rigorous, original argument that advances a live debate: a clearly stated thesis, a valid and carefully defended line of reasoning, and decisive engagement with the strongest opposing positions, developed at the length the argument requires. Mind also publishes critical notices — substantial, argument-driven engagements with important books — distinct from short book notes. A competent survey, a small variation on a familiar move, or a paper that dodges its best objections is a poor fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Mind author instructions.

When to trigger

  • The author names Mind for an analytic-philosophy article and wants a fit/framing check.
  • An argument must be developed and tightened — thesis, structure, and engagement with the strongest objections — to clear a leading generalist bar.
  • The author is choosing between Mind and another big generalist venue, or weighing a critical notice versus a full article.
  • The author needs Mind's originality/rigor bar and desk-reject heuristics.

Scope & topic fit

  • Philosophy of mind and philosophy of language, including their intersections with cognitive science where the contribution is philosophical.
  • Logic and the philosophy of logic, and formally informed metaphysics and epistemology.
  • Metaphysics and epistemology broadly, including foundational questions of method.
  • Value theory — ethics, metaethics, and political philosophy — argued with analytic rigor.
  • History of philosophy when it makes a live philosophical (not merely exegetical) contribution.
  • Critical notices: sustained, argumentative engagement with a significant recent book.

Method & evidence bar

  • The contribution is an original thesis defended by a valid, carefully structured argument; the central claim and its dialectical stakes are stated early and clearly.
  • The strongest objections and rival views are engaged head-on and answered, not deflected.
  • Distinctions are drawn precisely, key terms are defined, and the argument's logical form is transparent with independently motivated premises.
  • Scholarly engagement is current and fair, locating the contribution in the live literature without padding.
  • Examples, counterexamples, and thought experiments do genuine argumentative work.
  • Formal apparatus, where used, is deployed to sharpen rather than ornament the argument.

Structure & house style

  • Long full-length analytic article with a sustained argument, or a substantial critical notice; re-check current length expectations and article types on the live guide.
  • Thesis and roadmap appear early; sections build the argument step by step; objections-and-replies are integral, not appended.
  • Citation follows the journal's current style; footnotes carry qualifications and secondary dialectic.
  • Double-blind review: anonymize the manuscript (self-citations and acknowledgements) per current policy.
  • Prose is precise and economical; the central claim should remain legible to generalist analytic readers outside the immediate sub-area.
Show full SKILL.md (274 more words)Show less

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the press/society anchors, then cite the current Mind page you checked.
  • Search the live site for "Mind journal submission guidelines" (Oxford University Press / Mind Association) and follow the current version.
  • Re-check article types (articles, discussions, critical notices), length expectations, and the abstract requirement.
  • Confirm the citation/style format and anonymization for double-blind review.
  • Re-check the journal's policy on prior presentation/preprints, simultaneous submission, and AI-use disclosure.
  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • There is a single, clearly stated, original thesis with explicit dialectical stakes.
  • The argument is valid and each premise is independently motivated and defined.
  • The strongest objections and rival positions are engaged and answered, not deflected.
  • Engagement with the current literature is fair, current, and non-padding.
  • The manuscript is anonymized and follows the current citation style.
  • The article type (full article vs. critical notice) matches what the manuscript actually is.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • A survey or a small variation on a familiar move with no original advance.
  • An argument that ignores or only gestures at the strongest objections.
  • Imprecise theses, undefined key terms, or an opaque logical structure.
  • Formalism that adds apparatus without adding argumentative force.
  • Narrow sub-area interest with no general philosophical stake (better at a specialist venue).
  • A book review mis-pitched as a critical notice, or exegesis with no live contribution.

Re-routing decision

  • Equally strong generalist analytic article → the-philosophical-review / nous / the-journal-of-philosophy.
  • Moral, political, or normative-ethics focus → ethics / philosophy-and-public-affairs.
  • Short, focused argument or counterexample → analysis.
  • Aesthetics / philosophy of art → the-journal-of-aesthetics-and-art-criticism.
  • Argument about historical method or the epistemology of inquiry → history-and-theory.

Output format

text
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Mind
[Area] <closest philosophical sub-area; or critical notice>
[Thesis] <the original claim in one line>
[Argument/engagement] <does the rigor + objection-handling clear a leading generalist bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <length / article type / citation style / anonymization / preprint policy>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/mind of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Mind next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Mind compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Mind this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Analytics Trackingalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k1 repos~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Analyticsgetsentry/sentry46k—~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Debugging MCP AnalyticsPostHog/posthog40k—~7.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Opik Analytics Instrumentationcomet-ml/opik22k—~4.4kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Telemetry AnalyticsOpenHands/OpenHands90k—~305Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Analytics Tracking

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    Set up, audit, and debug analytics tracking implementation — GA4, Google Tag Manager, event taxonomy, conversion tracking, and data quality.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Analytics

    getsentry/sentry

    Official

    Instrument and discover analytics events in Sentry's frontend UI.

    46k GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Debug, support, and build PostHog MCP Analytics — product analytics for MCP servers (the @posthog/mcp and posthog.mcp SDKs plus the mcpanalytics product).

    40k GitHub stars~7.6k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Shows how to add product analytics events to Opik's frontend, Java backend and Python SDK, all reporting through Segment to PostHog with an opik_ name prefix.

    22k GitHub stars~4.4k tokensUpdated today
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Telemetry Analytics

    OpenHands/OpenHands

    This skill should be used when the user asks to "add tracking", "add a PostHog event", "change telemetry consent", "instrument onboarding", "debug analytics", or changes telemetry.ts…

    90k GitHub stars~305 tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Analytics

    Nexus-JPF/note-companion

    When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement.

    870 GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~2.2k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Mind

What does Mind do?

A skill your agent uses when targeting Mind or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Mind is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when targeting Mind or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.

When should I use Mind?

Mind fits situations like: deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.

How do I install Mind in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mind -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/mind in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/mind in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Mind in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mind -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/mind in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/mind in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Mind in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mind -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/mind, .gemini/skills/mind, .github/skills/mind and .opencode/skills/mind in your project.

What does Mind need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Mind is instructions for the agent only.

Does Mind access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Mind safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Mind use?

Mind is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Mind use?

About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Mind?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Mind: Analytics Tracking (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Analytics (getsentry/sentry, 46k stars), Debugging MCP Analytics (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars) and Opik Analytics Instrumentation (comet-ml/opik, 22k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Mind?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.