Agent skill

Living Reviews In Relativity

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR) or deciding whether an invited, continuously updated authoritative review in relativity and gravitation fits this…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Living Reviews In Relativity

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill living-reviews-in-relativity -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills living-reviews-in-relativity --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity .claude/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
living-reviews-in-relativity
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~2k tokens
SKILL.md length
868 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR) or deciding whether an invited, continuously updated authoritative review in relativity and gravitation fits this…

  • Targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR)
  • SKILL.md covers Journal positioning, When to trigger, Scope & topic fit and Method & evidence bar, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Deciding whether an invited

What it does

Living Reviews In Relativity is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR) or deciding whether an invited, continuously updated authoritative review in relativity and gravitation fits this very-high-impact Springer venue that publishes no primary research. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR)
  • Deciding whether an invited

Example prompts

  • “/living-reviews-in-relativity”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Living Reviews In Relativity loads about 2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 96 tokens; SKILL.md has 868 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~96
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 868 words, ~1,957 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
living-reviews-in-relativity
description
Use when targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR) or deciding whether an invited, continuously updated authoritative review in relativity and gravitation fits this very-high-impact Springer venue that publishes no primary research. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

Living Reviews in Relativity (living-reviews-in-relativity)

Journal positioning

Living Reviews in Relativity is a Springer journal that publishes invited, continuously updated, authoritative review articles in relativity and gravitation. Its defining character is the "living" model: an article is maintained and revised by its authors as the field evolves, so each review remains the current definitive reference on its topic. LRR is among the highest-impact journals in all of science precisely because each article is a comprehensive, expert, and up-to-date survey that the entire gravitation community relies on. It publishes no primary research; the currency is exhaustive, balanced, pedagogical synthesis with a long maintenance commitment. Readership is the international relativity, gravitation, cosmology, and gravitational-wave community, including graduate students entering the field. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before proposing, re-check the live author and invitation instructions on the Living Reviews in Relativity Springer site.

When to trigger

  • The author is considering a comprehensive, maintainable review of a relativity/gravitation topic for Living Reviews in Relativity.
  • A leading group is asked, or wishes to propose, an authoritative living survey they will commit to updating over years.
  • An author is choosing between Living Reviews in Relativity, Reviews of Modern Physics, and a topical-review format for a definitive gravitation review.
  • The author needs LRR's invitation model, comprehensiveness and maintenance expectations, and desk-reject criteria before drafting.

Scope & topic fit

  • Comprehensive reviews of established or rapidly developing topics in general relativity and gravitation, written as standing references.
  • Cosmology and relativistic astrophysics surveys — inflation, dark energy, structure formation, compact objects — at reference depth.
  • Gravitational-wave science: source modeling, detection methods, data analysis, and tests of GR, maintained against an evolving observational record.
  • Numerical relativity and approximation methods (post-Newtonian, perturbation theory) as complete methodological references.
  • Quantum gravity and semiclassical gravity: comprehensive surveys of a program's formalism, results, and open problems.
  • Mathematical relativity: rigorous, exhaustive treatments of a problem area suitable as a long-lived reference.

Method & evidence bar

  • The review must be comprehensive, balanced, and authoritative — the definitive current account of its topic, fairly covering competing approaches and open problems.
  • Authors must be recognized leaders able to develop the formalism and results in a self-contained, pedagogical way for newcomers and experts alike.
  • The "living" commitment is part of the bar: authors must be willing and able to maintain and update the article as the field advances.
  • Claims and results must be accurately attributed with comprehensive, current citation; derivations and figures should be correct, original, and pedagogical.
  • LRR articles are invited or arise from accepted proposals; a scope-and-outline proposal demonstrating coverage and the maintenance commitment is expected.
  • No primary research data are reported; any analysis is illustrative and clearly secondary to the review's synthetic, reference purpose.

Structure & house style

  • LRR articles use a long, hierarchically structured reference format: extended introduction, full development of formalism, results, applications, and open problems.
  • Length follows completeness; the article must stand alone so a reader can learn the topic from it without prior specialist background.
  • Use the journal's LaTeX class with consistent relativistic conventions (signature, units, indices) stated explicitly and maintained throughout.
  • Figures, tables, and appendices carry derivations, parameter compilations, and worked examples; schematics that clarify formalism are valued.
  • Versioning is part of the format: revisions are tracked and the article records its update history under the living model.
  • Citation is exhaustive and kept current at each revision, reflecting the article's standing-reference role.
Show full SKILL.md (301 more words)Show less

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked.
  • Search the live site for "Living Reviews in Relativity author guidelines" and follow the current Springer version.
  • Re-check the invitation/proposal process and the requirements and commitment for maintaining a living article over time.
  • Re-check article structure, length, versioning, and figure/notation conventions for the living format.
  • Re-check competing-interests, funding, AI-use, and figure-permission disclosure requirements; confirm preprint/update policy.
  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • One sentence — the relativity/gravitation topic this review will become the definitive living reference for.
  • The article is comprehensive, balanced, and self-contained, developing the formalism for newcomers and experts.
  • The author team can commit to maintaining and updating the article as the field evolves.
  • Competing approaches and open problems are fairly and currently covered; citation is exhaustive.
  • Figures, derivations, and conventions are original, correct, and consistent throughout.
  • A proposal with scope, outline, and the maintenance commitment is prepared, or an invitation is in hand.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • A primary-research manuscript submitted as a review; LRR publishes no original research.
  • A normal-length or one-sided survey lacking the comprehensiveness and balance of a standing reference.
  • A review with no credible commitment to the ongoing maintenance the living model requires.
  • A self-promotional account foregrounding the authors' own program and omitting competing approaches.
  • A full manuscript submitted without a proposal/invitation where the journal's commissioning model requires one.

Re-routing decision

  • Definitive, technical, specialist review of a physics topic in the broad Physical Review family: reviews-of-modern-physics.
  • Accessible, cross-disciplinary, editor-commissioned review for the broad physics readership: nature-reviews-physics.
  • Comprehensive, monograph-length one-time topical review across physics: physics-reports.
  • A complete primary-research study in gravitation rather than a review: classical-and-quantum-gravity or physical-review-d.

Output format

text
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Living Reviews in Relativity
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <is this a comprehensive, balanced, self-contained living reference, by leaders who can commit to maintaining it?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <invitation/proposal / maintenance commitment / structure & versioning / notation / disclosure / permissions>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Living Reviews In Relativity next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Living Reviews In Relativity compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Living Reviews In Relativity this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Live DashboardNousResearch/hermes-agent252k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Aria Live Regionsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~478Automated safety check: PassMIT
Openclaw Live Updateropenclaw/openclaw392k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Live Dashboardnexu-io/open-design100k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Living Docs Governanceaffaan-m/ECC277k1 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Live Dashboard

    NousResearch/hermes-agent

    Build self-updating dashboards from live sources. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.

    252k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Aria Live Regions

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Announce dynamic content with ARIA live regions.

    74k GitHub stars~478 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Openclaw Live Updater

    openclaw/openclaw

    Maintain the canonical live OpenClaw main checkout, macOS LaunchAgent-managed Gateway, local macOS app, exact-head main CI, and recurring full release validation.

    392k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Live Dashboard

    nexu-io/open-design

    Notion-style team dashboard rendered as a Live Artifact. An agent skill from nexu-io/open-design.

    100k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed
  • Keep a long-lived project's documentation from rotting by assigning existing project docs clear constitution, map, status, and history roles, then wiring the active agent harness to those canonical…

    277k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Public Relations

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests).

    54k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Living Reviews In Relativity

What does Living Reviews In Relativity do?

A skill your agent uses when targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR) or deciding whether an invited, continuously updated authoritative review in relativity and gravitation fits this…. Living Reviews In Relativity is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR) or deciding whether an invited, continuously updated authoritative review in relativity and gravitation fits this very-high-impact Springer venue that publishes no primary research.

When should I use Living Reviews In Relativity?

Living Reviews In Relativity fits situations like: targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR); deciding whether an invited.

How do I install Living Reviews In Relativity in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill living-reviews-in-relativity -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Living Reviews In Relativity in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill living-reviews-in-relativity -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Living Reviews In Relativity in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill living-reviews-in-relativity -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity, .gemini/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity, .github/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity and .opencode/skills/living-reviews-in-relativity in your project.

What does Living Reviews In Relativity need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Living Reviews In Relativity is instructions for the agent only.

Does Living Reviews In Relativity access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Living Reviews In Relativity safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Living Reviews In Relativity use?

Living Reviews In Relativity is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Living Reviews In Relativity use?

About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Living Reviews In Relativity?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Living Reviews In Relativity: Live Dashboard (NousResearch/hermes-agent, 252k stars), Aria Live Regions (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Openclaw Live Updater (openclaw/openclaw, 392k stars) and Live Dashboard (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Living Reviews In Relativity?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.