A skill your agent uses when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal…

MITAuto-check passedDevOps & Cloud

Install Kdd Workflow

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill kdd-workflow -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills kdd-workflow --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/KDD-Skills/skills/kdd-workflow .claude/skills/kdd-workflow && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
kdd-workflow
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
746 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal…

  • Planning a KDD project calendar across the venues two submission cycles per year
  • SKILL.md covers Cycle-choice decision, Pipeline milestones (per cycle), The Resubmit loop as a plan and Failure modes on this calendar, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Including cycle choice

What it does

Kdd Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal capacity planning, the Resubmit-to-next-cycle loop, ADS evidence lead times, and ACM e-rights/TAPS camera-ready scheduling for SIGKDD.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Site reliability engineering. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Planning a KDD project calendar across the venues two submission cycles per year
  • Including cycle choice
  • Abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart
  • Rebuttal capacity planning

Example prompts

  • “/kdd-workflow”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are yaml).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Kdd Workflow loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 746 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~80
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 746 words, ~1,699 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/kdd-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
kdd-workflow
description
Use when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal capacity planning, the Resubmit-to-next-cycle loop, ADS evidence lead times, and ACM e-rights/TAPS camera-ready scheduling for SIGKDD.

KDD Workflow

Use this as the project-management layer. KDD's calendar is structurally different from single-deadline ML venues: two cycles per year, each with an abstract deadline about one week before the paper deadline (2026 anchors: Jul 24/Jul 31, 2025 and Feb 1/Feb 8, 2026, AoE), a rebuttal window inside review, and a Resubmit outcome that connects the cycles into a pipeline. Plan the pipeline, not a single date.

KDD is an ACM conference, not a journal: no standing editor, leadership rotates per edition (the KDD 2026 committee roster lives on the conference site; individual names 待核实 before citing), and the cost surface is registration plus, under ACM Open, a possible APC for authors at non-participating institutions — with a temporary 65% ACM subsidy announced for 2026. Verify all money facts against current pages.

Cycle-choice decision

SituationChooseReasoning
Evidence complete, paper draftedNearest cycleWaiting adds staleness risk in fast subfields
Core result solid, ablations/scale runs missingNext cycleRebuttal cannot carry links, so missing evidence has no delivery channel later
Prior cycle returned ResubmitNext cycle, always declaredAddressed resubmissions carry better odds per the CFP; the forum id travels with you
ADS paper, launch too recent to measureCycle after the measurement window closesThe desk-check needs quantified post-launch numbers, not projections

Pipeline milestones (per cycle)

  • T-10 weeks — evidence lock plan: four-axis experiment plan agreed (kdd-experiments); ADS measurement windows already running.
  • T-6 weeks — mechanism freeze: no new components after this point; ablation matrix enumerable.
  • T-4 weeks — draft in acmart: writing directly in the two-column format; scale runs queued (cluster time is the real deadline for large-data papers).
  • T-2 weeks — artifact freeze: anonymized repository built fresh, cited in the PDF, smoke-tested on a clean machine (kdd-artifact-evaluation).
  • T-1 week — abstract deadline: title/abstract/authors/track registered; all co-author OpenReview profiles complete (five-year history, DBLP, ORCID — chasing this is a named person's job).
  • T-0 — paper deadline: submission audit (kdd-submission); ADS deployment quantification pointed to; resubmission declarations attached.
  • Review window — rebuttal capacity: reserve author-days in advance; per-review responses under a link ban are writing-intensive (kdd-author-response).
  • Decision — branch: Accept → e-rights + TAPS + APC status check (kdd-camera-ready); Resubmit → change-summary plan against the review contract; Reject → routing decision (kdd-topic-selection).

The Resubmit loop as a plan

yaml
# kdd-pipeline.yaml - one paper, tracked across cycles
paper: streamhive
track: research
cycle_history:
  - cycle: 2026-C1
    outcome: resubmit
    contract:            # concerns named in reviews = next cycle's spec
      - temporal-split rebuild (R2)
      - decay-mechanism ablation (R1)
      - scale claim beyond 10M edges (R3)
  - cycle: 2026-C2
    changes_summary_page: drafted   # mandatory first page of the PDF
    prior_forum_id: declared
    new_evidence: [table5_ablation, 2.1B_run, rebuilt_splits]
owners:
  profiles_gate: <name>       # co-author OpenReview completeness
  artifact_freeze: <name>
  rebuttal_window: <name, name>

The discipline: the review contract is written down the day reviews arrive, and every contract item maps to a change-summary line before the next cycle's abstract deadline.

Show full SKILL.md (354 more words)Show less

Failure modes on this calendar

  • Treating the abstract deadline as soft: at KDD it gates the submission and the track choice; a placeholder abstract in the wrong track is a real incident.
  • Discovering an incomplete co-author profile on paper-deadline day — the one blocker that requires someone else's login to fix.
  • Queuing the largest-scale run after the draft: at KDD the scale run is the contribution evidence, not a garnish, and clusters have queues.
  • Winning a Resubmit and then re-litigating the reviews instead of executing the contract — the returning AC checks the named concerns first.
  • Forgetting that notification and camera-ready dates for the current cycle were never verified (待核实) and promising co-authors a calendar the venue never published.

Vignette: one paper, three cycles, two tracks

A team's trajectory that the pipeline model handles cleanly: Cycle 1, the sampling method goes to Research and draws a Resubmit with three named concerns. Between cycles, the method also ships inside the company's ranking system. Cycle 2 now offers a fork: return the Research paper with the contract executed, or wait one more cycle and submit the deployed system to ADS with a real measurement window. The pipeline answer: do both, sequenced — Research resubmission in Cycle 2 (the contract items are done and Resubmit standing decays with staleness), ADS submission the following cycle once the post-launch window closes. Two papers, two tracks, no dual-submission conflict, each riding the evidence it actually has (kdd-topic-selection governs the fork; kdd-related-work governs the overlap declarations between them).

Capacity planning numbers

Planning heuristics — replace with your team's observed values after one cycle:

  • Rebuttal window: one author-day per review for text-only responses; double it if any new run is permitted and needed.
  • Anonymized artifact build from a mature internal repo: 2-3 days including the clean-machine smoke test, dominated by de-identification review.
  • ADS measurement window: whatever the CFP demands is a floor; credible pre/post or A/B windows are typically weeks, which is why the ADS decision happens a quarter early, not a deadline-month early.
  • Profile-gate sweep across N co-authors: an hour of work, a week of waiting on other people — start it at abstract-minus-two-weeks.

Output format

text
[Pipeline stage] planning / evidence / drafting / submitted-C<k> / rebuttal / decision-branch
[Cycle target] <cycle + abstract/paper dates from current CFP, AoE>
[Critical path] <three tasks that decide readiness>
[Resubmit contract] <items + owners, or N-A>
[Money checks] ACM Open status / APC exposure / registration (待核实 items flagged)
[Owner map] profiles: <who> / artifact: <who> / rebuttal: <who>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in KDD-Skills/skills/kdd-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Kdd Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Kdd Workflow compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Kdd Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Inference Autopilotrednote-machine-learning/Inference-autopilot144—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Executing Distributed System Testsshenli/distributed-system-testing231—~5.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Alerting Irmgrafana/skills2811 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Slo Implementationwshobson/agents40k11 repos~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Agentforce D360 Analyzeforcedotcom/sf-skills1.1k—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Inference Autopilot

    rednote-machine-learning/Inference-autopilot

    Analyze, benchmark, diagnose, and optimize large-model inference deployments from hardware inventory, model details, workload traces, and latency or throughput SLOs.

    144 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Executing Distributed System Tests

    shenli/distributed-system-testing

    A skill your agent uses when running a previously designed distributed-systems test plan against a real or simulated cluster — driving fault injection, workload, chaos scenarios, linearizability /…

    231 GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check: notes
  • Alerting Irm

    grafana/skills

    Official

    Configure Grafana Alerting, Incident Response Management (IRM), and SLOs end-to-end — provisions Grafana-managed and data-source-managed alert rules, contact points (Slack/PagerDuty/email/webhook)…

    281 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.9k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Slo Implementation

    wshobson/agents

    Define and implement Service Level Indicators (SLIs) and Service Level Objectives (SLOs) with error budgets and alerting.

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~1.7k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Agentforce D360 Analyze

    forcedotcom/sf-skills

    Data Cloud 360° view of a single Agentforce session. An agent skill from forcedotcom/sf-skills.

    1.1k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Promql

    grafana/skills

    Official

    Write, validate, and optimize PromQL for Prometheus / Grafana Mimir / Grafana Cloud Metrics.

    281 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Kdd Workflow

What does Kdd Workflow do?

A skill your agent uses when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal…. Kdd Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal capacity planning, the Resubmit-to-next-cycle loop, ADS evidence lead times, and ACM e-rights/TAPS camera-ready scheduling for SIGKDD.

When should I use Kdd Workflow?

Kdd Workflow fits situations like: planning a KDD project calendar across the venues two submission cycles per year; including cycle choice; abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart; rebuttal capacity planning.

How do I install Kdd Workflow in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill kdd-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (KDD-Skills/skills/kdd-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/kdd-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Kdd Workflow in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill kdd-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (KDD-Skills/skills/kdd-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/kdd-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Kdd Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill kdd-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/kdd-workflow, .gemini/skills/kdd-workflow, .github/skills/kdd-workflow and .opencode/skills/kdd-workflow in your project.

What does Kdd Workflow need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Kdd Workflow is instructions for the agent only.

Does Kdd Workflow access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Kdd Workflow safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Kdd Workflow use?

Kdd Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Kdd Workflow use?

About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Kdd Workflow?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Kdd Workflow: Inference Autopilot (rednote-machine-learning/Inference-autopilot, 144 stars), Executing Distributed System Tests (shenli/distributed-system-testing, 231 stars), Alerting Irm (grafana/skills, 281 stars) and Slo Implementation (wshobson/agents, 40k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Kdd Workflow?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.