A skill your agent uses when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Jim Review Process

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jim-review-process -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jim-review-process --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-International-Marketing-Skills/skills/jim-review-process .claude/skills/jim-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jim-review-process
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
691 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers…

  • Works in 4 steps: Administrative screen. ScholarOne… → Editor screen. The Editor-in-Chief… → AE and reviewers. Surviving papers go to… → …
  • A Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The pipeline, Desk-reject triggers specific… and What JIM reviewers reward, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Jim Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers, and how to wait productively. It explains the process; jim-rebuttal handles the response once a letter arrives.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • A Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review
  • About to be — understanding the editorial pipeline
  • Decision categories
  • Desk-reject triggers

Example prompts

  • “/jim-review-process”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Administrative screen. ScholarOne staff/editorial check: file split (title page vs. anonymized main document), 50-page cap, 200-word…
  2. Editor screen. The Editor-in-Chief (Ayşegül Özsomer since 2024 — verify the masthead) reads for scope and bar. A meaningful share of…
  3. AE and reviewers. Surviving papers go to an associate/area editor and typically two to three double-anonymized reviewers drawn from the…
  4. Decision. Reject; reject-and-resubmit (a real door at AMA journals — a new submission with a fresh review team is being invited); major…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jim Review Process loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 691 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~77
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 691 words, ~1,459 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jim-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jim-review-process
description
Use when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers, and how to wait productively. It explains the process; jim-rebuttal handles the response once a letter arrives.

Navigating JIM Review (jim-review-process)

When to trigger

  • The paper was just submitted and the team wants to know what happens next
  • Months have passed with no word and someone wants to nudge the editor
  • The group is estimating revision timelines for planning (tenure clocks, dissertations)
  • Pre-submission, to engineer around JIM's known desk-reject triggers

The pipeline

  1. Administrative screen. ScholarOne staff/editorial check: file split (title page vs. anonymized main document), 50-page cap, 200-word abstract, formatting. Failures bounce back without review — annoying but recoverable.
  2. Editor screen. The Editor-in-Chief (Ayşegül Özsomer since 2024 — verify the masthead) reads for scope and bar. A meaningful share of submissions end here; see the desk-reject list below.
  3. AE and reviewers. Surviving papers go to an associate/area editor and typically two to three double-anonymized reviewers drawn from the international marketing community — expect at least one measurement-focused reader on any multi-country survey, and reviewers located in or expert on your sampled regions.
  4. Decision. Reject; reject-and-resubmit (a real door at AMA journals — a new submission with a fresh review team is being invited); major revision; minor revision; conditional accept. First rounds at specialist AMA journals commonly take roughly three to five months — treat any figure as folklore until confirmed on current data; the office responds to polite status queries after ~4 months of silence.

Desk-reject triggers specific to JIM

  • Single-country data, no cross-national theory. The setting is foreign; the theory is not international. The most common trigger by reputation.
  • Culture as epilogue. Country differences found, then explained post hoc with a cultural dimension never hypothesized.
  • No equivalence evidence. Cross-country scale comparisons with no invariance testing or translation protocol.
  • Domestic replication abroad. "X, established in the U.S., holds in country Y" with no boundary-condition theorizing.
  • Wrong journal. An IB/strategy paper (FDI, governance) without a marketing mechanism, or a general marketing paper where the international element is a robustness footnote.
  • Managerial silence. No implication a border-crossing firm could act on.

If any of these describes the paper, do not submit hoping for reviewer mercy — route back to jim-topic-selection or jim-methods.

What JIM reviewers reward

Reviewer-proofing is cheaper than rebutting. Papers that fare well arrive with: a pre-committed invariance table; a country-selection rationale on the focal dimension; formal tests of every claimed country difference; implications framed as market profiles; and honest scope statements ("our two-country contrast cannot separate income from individualism; we therefore…"). Pre-empting the alternative explanation a regional expert will raise — response styles, sampling differences, a local market shock during fieldwork — signals craft.

Show full SKILL.md (277 more words)Show less

Waiting productively

  • Log the manuscript ID, submission date, and status changes; ScholarOne statuses ("under review," "awaiting AE recommendation") are informative.
  • Draft the anticipated-objections memo now: the five hardest questions and your best answers, with analyses pre-run. It becomes the rebuttal skeleton.
  • Consider a JIM paper development workshop (the journal runs them periodically at AMS/AMA conferences) for the next project — they are fit-calibration gold.
  • Do not submit the paper elsewhere in parallel; AMA journals enforce exclusivity.
  • Watch for special-issue calls (recent examples: global sustainability; AI in international marketing) — a well-matched special issue changes the reviewer pool and the fit conversation for follow-on work.

Decision-letter triage preview

Reject with signal (reviewers engaged the theory) → fix and target IMR/JWB or rebuild for a new JIM submission if invited. Reject-and-resubmit → treat as a major revision with the freedom (and risk) of a fresh team. Major revision → the modal good outcome; expect measurement and identification demands, possibly a new country or study. Minor revision → execute precisely, no scope creep. Full playbook: jim-rebuttal.

Checklist

  • Package engineered against all six desk-reject triggers before submission
  • Manuscript ID and dates logged; status meanings understood
  • Anticipated-objections memo drafted while waiting
  • No concurrent submission anywhere
  • Timeline expectations set from current information, not folklore
  • Masthead and process facts re-checked on ama.org (they rotate)

Anti-patterns

  • Nudging the editor at week six of a normal cycle
  • Reading "under review" tea leaves daily instead of writing the objections memo
  • Treating reject-and-resubmit as a rejection (it is an invitation) or as an acceptance (it is not)
  • Arguing scope with a desk rejection instead of fixing the international-theory gap it named
  • Planning a tenure case around a single JIM round going perfectly

Output format

text
【Stage】admin screen / editor screen / with reviewers / decision received
【Desk-reject audit】six triggers: clear / at-risk on [which]
【Clock】submitted [date]; nudge threshold ~4 months
【Prep】anticipated-objections memo: drafted? analyses pre-run?
【Contingency】R&R → jim-rebuttal; reject → refit via jim-topic-selection or retarget
【Next skill】jim-rebuttal (once the letter arrives)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-International-Marketing-Skills/skills/jim-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jim Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jim Review Process compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jim Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Internal Commsalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Internal Communicationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Internal Communications Writeranthropics/skills180k38 repos~378Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Internal Comms Anthropicsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~702Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Nofollow Internalthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~579Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Internal Comms

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a Head of People Ops, BizOps lead, or Internal Communications owner needs to draft and sequence an internal-only change-management communication — a re-org announcement…

    28k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Internal Communication

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Internal communication log: title, type, date, department, host and attendees, agenda, action items, follow-up date, meeting link and delivery status.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.4k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Official

    A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill…

    180k GitHub starsUsed in 38 repos~378 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Internal Comms Anthropic

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Compatibility alias for internal-comms: draft status updates, newsletters and FAQs from approved sources.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~702 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Nofollow Internal

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when auditing internal link structure or reviewing link attributes.

    74k GitHub stars~579 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Internal Links

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when auditing a site's internal link structure, identifying pages that need more incoming links, generating contextual linking opportunities between related content, or…

    74k GitHub stars~770 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jim Review Process

What does Jim Review Process do?

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers…. Jim Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers, and how to wait productively.

When should I use Jim Review Process?

Jim Review Process fits situations like: A Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review; about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline; decision categories; desk-reject triggers.

How do I install Jim Review Process in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jim-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-International-Marketing-Skills/skills/jim-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jim-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jim Review Process in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jim-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-International-Marketing-Skills/skills/jim-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jim-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jim Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jim-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jim-review-process, .gemini/skills/jim-review-process, .github/skills/jim-review-process and .opencode/skills/jim-review-process in your project.

What does Jim Review Process need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jim Review Process is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jim Review Process access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jim Review Process safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jim Review Process use?

Jim Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jim Review Process use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jim Review Process?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jim Review Process: Internal Comms (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Internal Communication (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Internal Communications Writer (anthropics/skills, 180k stars) and Internal Comms Anthropic (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jim Review Process?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.