New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Jhr Review Process

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the…

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Jhr Review Process

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhr-review-process -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhr-review-process --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Human-Resources-Skills/skills/jhr-review-process .claude/skills/jhr-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jhr-review-process
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
631 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the…

  • Works in 5 steps: Is this empirical microeconomics in a… → What variation identifies the effect —… → Is there a magnitude in policy units, or… → …
  • You need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How JHR review works (verified…, How to act on it and Checklist, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Jhr Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the reconciliation requirement, and the optional review-recycling shortcut. Sets expectations; it does not draft the paper.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Accounting and bookkeeping and Recruiting and HR. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • You need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review
  • The fast desk-reject without outside review
  • The reconciliation requirement
  • The optional review-recycling shortcut

Example prompts

  • “/jhr-review-process”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Is this empirical microeconomics in a JHR field, or HR-management dressed in
  2. What variation identifies the effect — is the design named (rollout, cutoff,
  3. Is there a magnitude in policy units, or only "significant effects"?
  4. Does the paper acknowledge the closest prior estimates and hint at the
  5. Would a policy audience care if the answer flipped sign?

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jhr Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 631 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~79
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 631 words, ~1,294 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jhr-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jhr-review-process
description
Use when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the reconciliation requirement, and the optional review-recycling shortcut. Sets expectations; it does not draft the paper.

Editorial Process (jhr-review-process)

When to trigger

  • Setting expectations on timelines and decision types at JHR
  • Deciding whether to attach a prior journal's reports to speed review
  • Understanding why a paper might be desk-rejected without referees
  • Wanting to pre-empt the reconciliation / sensitivity demands referees apply

How JHR review works (verified 2026-06-01)

  • Single-anonymous (single-blind): "Referees are anonymous, but author names are not kept from reviewers." The process is run by the Editor (Anna Aizer, Brown; Michael Lovenheim, Cornell, from 2026-07-01), coeditors, and associate editors, with volunteer expert reviewers.
  • Fast desk-reject WITHOUT outside review. Papers a handling editor/coeditor judges unlikely to survive review are released quickly without being sent to referees, at the editor's discretion. The $175 fee does not guarantee outside review and is not refunded for out-of-scope (management/personnel) papers — so the desk screen is the first real hurdle.
  • Reconciliation requirement (distinctive): manuscripts are judged partly on whether they reconcile their results with prior published work on the same topic. Authors may be required to run comparative estimation (re-estimate under the prior literature's spec/sample) and present sensitivity tests. Build this in before submitting, not after a referee demands it.
  • Review-recycling shortcut (optional): authors may submit a prior journal's decision letter and referee reports; JHR may use them — and may contact the prior journal's editor or referees — to speed review. Useful when a paper was close at another journal and the reports are constructive.

How to act on it

  • Treat the desk screen as the highest-leverage gate: a legible policy-relevant question, a clearly stated identifying variation, and a one-paragraph reconciliation note give the handling editor a reason to send it out.
  • If a prior submission generated strong-but-fixable reports, consider attaching them — but only if your revision genuinely answers them.
  • Anticipate the reconciliation ask in jhr-data-analysis: have the comparative estimates and sensitivity tests ready.

Checklist

  • Question and identifying variation legible in the first two pages (desk screen)
  • Reconciliation with prior published estimates addressed up front
  • Comparative estimation and sensitivity tests prepared
  • Decision made on whether to attach prior-journal reports
  • Scope confirmed (not HR-management) so the fee is not wasted

Anti-patterns

  • Assuming the fee buys outside review — it does not
  • Ignoring prior published estimates that contradict yours
  • Attaching old referee reports the revision does not actually address
  • Burying the identifying variation past the desk-reading window
Show full SKILL.md (251 more words)Show less

Desk-screen simulation

Run the manuscript's first two pages against the questions a JHR handling editor can realistically answer in one sitting:

  1. Is this empirical microeconomics in a JHR field, or HR-management dressed in economics language?
  2. What variation identifies the effect — is the design named (rollout, cutoff, lottery, instrument) by page two?
  3. Is there a magnitude in policy units, or only "significant effects"?
  4. Does the paper acknowledge the closest prior estimates and hint at the bridge?
  5. Would a policy audience care if the answer flipped sign?

Illustrative contrast: "We examine determinants of teacher turnover" reads as desk risk; "A pension-vesting cliff at year five lets us estimate how deferred compensation retains teachers, and our retention effect is half the prior descriptive literature's" survives the same screen. If two or more questions fail, route back to jhr-contribution-framing before paying the fee.

Timeline posture

JHR does not commit to public turnaround statistics, and stated desk-release speed is "quickly" rather than a number — do not promise coauthors a specific month, and confirm against the journal's current author guidelines for any stated processing details. What is controllable: the desk screen is the fastest gate, and review recycling can compress the refereeing stage when prior reports are attached.

What arrives with a decision

  • A synthesizing letter from the handling editor — at JHR this letter, not any single report, defines the revision contract.
  • Referee reports that commonly lead with identification (pre-trends, first stages, cutoff manipulation) and the reconciliation question before exposition.

Output format

【Decision risk】desk-reject likelihood / why
【Reconciliation】prior estimates addressed? [Y/N]
【Sensitivity】comparative/robustness ready? [Y/N]
【Recycling】attach prior reports? [Y/N + reason]
【Next step】jhr-submission or jhr-rebuttal

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Human-Resources-Skills/skills/jhr-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jhr Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jhr Review Process compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jhr Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Find Service Providersjeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.8k—~4.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Jhr Identification Strategyfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~393Automated safety check: PassNone
Jhr Literature Positioningfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~376Automated safety check: PassNone
OdooLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills2.2k—~4.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
OdooLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills2.2k—~5kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Find Service Providers

    jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace

    A skill your agent uses whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, enrich, or research US professional-services firms — law, marketing, consulting, accounting, IT services, architecture…

    2.8k GitHub stars~4.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check: notes

  • Jhr Identification Strategy

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when stress-testing causal identification for a Journal of Human Resources empirical-micro manuscript, including RCT, DID, RDD, IV, event studies, decompositions, policy…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~393 tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

  • Jhr Literature Positioning

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning a Journal of Human Resources manuscript against applied microeconomics, labor, education, health, development, discrimination, retirement, and policy…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~376 tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

  • Odoo

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills

    Full-featured Odoo 19 ERP connector for OpenClaw - Sales, CRM, Purchase, Inventory, Projects, HR, Fleet, Manufacturing (80+ operations, complete Python code included, XML-RPC integration).

    2.2k GitHub stars~4.9k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Sales & SupportAuto-check: notes

  • Odoo

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills

    Full-featured Odoo 17/18/19 ERP connector for OpenClaw — Sales, CRM, Purchase, Inventory, Projects, HR, Fleet, Manufacturing (80+ operations, TypeScript plugin, XML-RPC integration).

    2.2k GitHub stars~5k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Sales & SupportAuto-check: notes

  • Sync Upstream

    nyaruka/phonenumbers

    Sync this Go port with a new upstream google/libphonenumber release — regenerate the embedded metadata and reconcile the ported Java logic.

    1.6k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Jhr Review Process

What does Jhr Review Process do?

A skill your agent uses when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the…. Jhr Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the reconciliation requirement, and the optional review-recycling shortcut.

When should I use Jhr Review Process?

Jhr Review Process fits situations like: you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review; the fast desk-reject without outside review; the reconciliation requirement; the optional review-recycling shortcut.

How do I install Jhr Review Process in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhr-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Human-Resources-Skills/skills/jhr-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jhr-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jhr Review Process in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhr-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Human-Resources-Skills/skills/jhr-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jhr-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jhr Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhr-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jhr-review-process, .gemini/skills/jhr-review-process, .github/skills/jhr-review-process and .opencode/skills/jhr-review-process in your project.

What does Jhr Review Process need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jhr Review Process is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jhr Review Process access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jhr Review Process safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jhr Review Process use?

Jhr Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jhr Review Process use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jhr Review Process?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jhr Review Process: Find Service Providers (jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace, 2.8k stars), Jhr Identification Strategy (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Jhr Literature Positioning (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars) and Odoo (LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills, 2.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jhr Review Process?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.