Agent skill

Jel Organizing Framework

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Jel Organizing Framework

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-organizing-framework -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jel-organizing-framework --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-organizing-framework .claude/skills/jel-organizing-framework && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jel-organizing-framework
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
575 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument…

  • Imposing an analytical structure
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Why the spine is the whole…, The test of a good framework and Checklist, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Jel Organizing Framework is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument about the field. Designs the framework; it does not gather the literature (jel-literature-synthesis) or judge balance (jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Imposing an analytical structure

Example prompts

  • “/jel-organizing-framework”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jel Organizing Framework loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 89 tokens; SKILL.md has 575 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~89
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 575 words, ~1,225 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jel-organizing-framework/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jel-organizing-framework
description
Use when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument about the field. Designs the framework; it does not gather the literature (jel-literature-synthesis) or judge balance (jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

Organizing Framework — the Survey's Spine (jel-organizing-framework)

When to trigger

  • The evidence matrix is built but the draft would read like a list of papers
  • Sections are named after topics ("Empirical studies", "Theoretical work") rather than ideas
  • A reader could not predict what comes next or why papers are grouped as they are
  • You cannot state in one sentence the argument the survey makes about the field

Why the spine is the whole game at JEL

The single most-cited reason JEL surveys fail is that they are annotated bibliographies: paper-after-paper summaries with no organizing idea. A great JEL survey imposes a structure the field did not have — a taxonomy, a unifying framework, a sequence of questions, or a simple model — that makes scattered work legible. The framework is the contribution; the citations are the evidence. Choose the spine deliberately:

Spine typeOrganizes the field byBest when
Taxonomymutually-exclusive categories of mechanism/approachthe field is fragmented into incommensurable camps
Unifying modela simple framework whose parameters index the studiesresults disagree because they estimate different parameters of one structure
Question sequencea logical chain of sub-questionsthe field has a natural "first we must know X, then Y" order
Chronological/paradigmhow thinking evolved and whythe evolution of ideas is itself the lesson
Methods spectrumfrom least to most credible designsthe survey's value is appraising what is actually known

Pick one primary spine; a second axis can be a within-section ordering, but a survey with two competing spines reads as two surveys.

The test of a good framework

  • Exhaustive + exclusive (MECE-ish): every important paper has exactly one natural home, and the categories do not bleed into each other.
  • Generative: the framework predicts where gaps are — empty cells are open questions, not omissions.
  • Reconciling: apparent contradictions in the literature become explained (studies disagree because they sit in different cells / estimate different objects).
  • Portable: a non-specialist can restate the spine after one read and use it to slot a new paper they encounter.

Stress-test by trying to place 5 hard cases (papers that resist categorization). If three of them have no home, the spine is wrong — redesign before drafting.

The framework is also what lets you be selective without being incomplete: once each cell is defined, confirmatory studies can be cited in clusters within their cell while the prose discusses only the cell-defining work. A survey without a spine cannot do this — it must either summarize everything (bloat) or omit silently (gaps). Design the spine before you decide what to foreground.

Show full SKILL.md (156 more words)Show less

Checklist

  • One primary spine chosen (taxonomy / model / question-sequence / paradigm / methods)
  • The survey's one-sentence argument about the field is written
  • Every category traces to evidence-matrix rows (no empty rhetorical buckets)
  • The framework reconciles at least one apparent contradiction in the literature
  • Empty cells are surfaced as open questions (generativity)
  • 5 hard-case papers each have a natural home
  • Section headings name ideas/mechanisms, not "theoretical vs. empirical"
  • A non-specialist could restate the spine and slot a new paper into it

Anti-patterns

  • The annotated bibliography: paper-by-paper summaries with no organizing idea (the cardinal JEL sin)
  • Sections named "Theory", "Evidence", "Other" — categories that carry no analytical content
  • A taxonomy whose categories overlap so every paper is cited three times in three places
  • Two competing spines fighting for control of the same survey
  • A framework so bespoke only the author can apply it (not portable)
  • Hiding the contribution: never stating, in one sentence, what the survey argues about the field

Output format

【Spine type】taxonomy / unifying-model / question-sequence / paradigm / methods-spectrum
【Argument about the field】"<one sentence the survey makes>"
【Categories】<the cells / sub-questions, each MECE>
【Reconciliation】<which contradiction the framework explains>
【Open questions】<empty cells surfaced as gaps>
【Hard-case test】5 awkward papers each placed? Y/N
【Next step】→ jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance (fill cells fairly + even-handedly)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-organizing-framework of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jel Organizing Framework next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jel Organizing Framework compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jel Organizing Framework this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Analytics Trackingalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k1 repos~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Analyticsgetsentry/sentry46k—~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Scientific Thinking Literature Reviewaffaan-m/ECC276k1 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Organizationthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~609Automated safety check: PassMIT
Literature ReviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Analytics Tracking

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    Set up, audit, and debug analytics tracking implementation — GA4, Google Tag Manager, event taxonomy, conversion tracking, and data quality.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Analytics

    getsentry/sentry

    Official

    Instrument and discover analytics events in Sentry's frontend UI.

    46k GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.

    276k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Organization

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when auditing structured data on a business or brand website homepage.

    74k GitHub stars~609 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Runs systematic, scoping or narrative literature reviews across PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv and Semantic Scholar, with citation checks and Markdown or PDF output.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Official

    Debug, support, and build PostHog MCP Analytics — product analytics for MCP servers (the @posthog/mcp and posthog.mcp SDKs plus the mcpanalytics product).

    40k GitHub stars~7.6k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jel Organizing Framework

What does Jel Organizing Framework do?

A skill your agent uses when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument…. Jel Organizing Framework is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument about the field.

When should I use Jel Organizing Framework?

Jel Organizing Framework fits situations like: imposing an analytical structure.

How do I install Jel Organizing Framework in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-organizing-framework -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-organizing-framework in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jel-organizing-framework in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jel Organizing Framework in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-organizing-framework -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-organizing-framework in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jel-organizing-framework in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jel Organizing Framework in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-organizing-framework -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jel-organizing-framework, .gemini/skills/jel-organizing-framework, .github/skills/jel-organizing-framework and .opencode/skills/jel-organizing-framework in your project.

What does Jel Organizing Framework need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jel Organizing Framework is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jel Organizing Framework access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jel Organizing Framework safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jel Organizing Framework use?

Jel Organizing Framework is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jel Organizing Framework use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jel Organizing Framework?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jel Organizing Framework: Analytics Tracking (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Analytics (getsentry/sentry, 46k stars), Scientific Thinking Literature Review (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars) and Organization (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jel Organizing Framework?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.