A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Jeem Robustness

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-robustness -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jeem-robustness --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-robustness .claude/skills/jeem-robustness && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jeem-robustness
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~2.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
985 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive…

  • Works in 5 steps: Lock the primary specification first.… → One threat → one check. A robustness… → Show stability of the welfare number,… → …
  • A Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscripts headline estimate — a damage
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The JEEM robustness bar, Robustness craft and The environmental robustness…, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Jeem Robustness is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive specification, spatial, sample, and inference choices. Builds the targeted robustness suite environmental-economics referees expect; it does not establish primary identification (jeem-identification) or format exhibits (jeem-tables-figures).

Its SKILL.md is about 2.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • A Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscripts headline estimate — a damage
  • Treatment effect — must be shown to survive specification
  • Inference choices

Example prompts

  • “/jeem-robustness”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Lock the primary specification first. Everything else is a perturbation around it; do not present five co-equal specs and let the reader…
  2. One threat → one check. A robustness table reads as "here is the worry, here is the evidence it is not a problem."
  3. Show stability of the welfare number, not just significance. The persuasive object is that the damage / WTP / pass-through barely moves…
  4. Treat space as first-order. Wrong (non-spatial) SEs are the single most common JEEM robustness failure; vary the Conley cutoff and report…
  5. Be honest where it weakens. A check that shifts the estimate is information — bound the implication rather than hiding it.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jeem Robustness loads about 2.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 109 tokens; SKILL.md has 985 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~109
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 985 words, ~2,145 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jeem-robustness/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jeem-robustness
description
Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive specification, spatial, sample, and inference choices. Builds the targeted robustness suite environmental-economics referees expect; it does not establish primary identification (jeem-identification) or format exhibits (jeem-tables-figures).

Robustness Strategy (jeem-robustness)

When to trigger

  • The main estimate is in hand and you must show it is not a one-specification artifact
  • A referee asks "is this robust to spatial correlation / alternative bandwidth / sample / functional form?"
  • The result depends on a market definition, a buffer radius, a weather aggregation, or a pollution-monitor selection that could be questioned
  • You suspect specification-search concerns in a hedonic or valuation and want to pre-empt them

The JEEM robustness bar

JEEM referees probe whether the welfare-relevant number is stable, spatially honest, and not the product of researcher degrees of freedom. Robustness here is not a wall of regressions — it is a targeted set of checks each tied to a specific threat, several of which are distinctively environmental. Map every plausible objection to the one check that answers it, and report so the reader sees the estimate barely moves.

Threat to the resultThe check that answers it
Spatial correlation in errorsConley spatial SEs; vary the cutoff distance; cluster on geography
Hedonic market / buffer definitionvary the buffer radius, the boundary band, the housing-market boundary
Omitted amenities / sortingparcel/boundary FE; amenity controls in steps; Oster δ for selection
Staggered-DiD biasCallaway–Sant'Anna or Sun–Abraham; honest-DiD pre-trend bounds
Weather/climate aggregationalternative bins/degree-days; alternative gridded products; placebo seasons
Monitor/station selectionreweight by coverage; restrict to dense-monitor areas; interpolation sensitivity
Valuation functional formsemi-log vs. Box–Cox hedonic; mixed-logit vs. conditional logit; WTP-space estimation
Inference too narrowcorrect clustering level; wild-cluster bootstrap (few units); randomization inference
Multiple outcomes/subgroupsRomano–Wolf / List–Shaikh–Wooldridge MHT adjustment

Robustness craft

  1. Lock the primary specification first. Everything else is a perturbation around it; do not present five co-equal specs and let the reader guess the preferred one.
  2. One threat → one check. A robustness table reads as "here is the worry, here is the evidence it is not a problem."
  3. Show stability of the welfare number, not just significance. The persuasive object is that the damage / WTP / pass-through barely moves, not that an asterisk survives.
  4. Treat space as first-order. Wrong (non-spatial) SEs are the single most common JEEM robustness failure; vary the Conley cutoff and report it.
  5. Be honest where it weakens. A check that shifts the estimate is information — bound the implication rather than hiding it.

The environmental robustness checks referees expect first

Three checks are close to mandatory at JEEM and should appear in the main results, not the appendix:

  1. Spatial inference. If the units are geographic and shocks are spatially correlated (almost always, for pollution, weather, land, and housing), report Conley spatial standard errors and vary the cutoff distance. "We cluster by state" is not a defense when the relevant correlation is at the watershed or airshed scale.
  2. Geographic-scope sensitivity. Vary the buffer radius, the boundary band, or the market definition; show the welfare estimate is not an artifact of one arbitrary spatial window.
  3. Design-timing sensitivity. For staggered regulations, an honest-DiD bound on the pre-trend; for RD thresholds, a bandwidth sweep and a donut. These show the design, not luck, produced the result.

A paper that omits all three reads as not knowing the field's standards, regardless of how many other columns the robustness table has.

Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)

Run the battery, don't just enumerate it. Full map: execution-with-mcp. JEEM is environmental economics — policy/regulation designs and non-market valuation; the causal chain serves its program-evaluation lane.

  • Many outcomes / specifications: romano_wolf (step-down FWER) or benjamini_hochberg.
  • OVB sensitivity: oster_delta / sensemakr.
  • Inference: wild_cluster_bootstrap (few clusters), twoway_cluster / conley.
  • Re-fit off one handle: audit_result(result_id) lists missing checks + the exact suggest_function for each.
  • Exhibits: etable / did_summary_to_latex from the handle — no retyped numbers.

Decisive checks in the body, exhaustive battery in the appendix. JF execution walkthrough.

Show full SKILL.md (372 more words)Show less

Checklist

  • Primary specification declared before perturbations
  • Each check mapped to a specific threat, not added for volume
  • Spatial inference: Conley SEs with a reported cutoff, or geographic clustering, where units are spatial
  • Hedonic/valuation: buffer radius, market boundary, and functional form varied
  • Design-specific sensitivity (honest-DiD bounds / RD bandwidth / weak-IV set) included
  • Selection-on-unobservables addressed (Oster δ or stepwise controls) for hedonics
  • Multiple-hypothesis adjustment if many outcomes/subgroups/regions
  • Stability of the welfare-relevant point estimate shown; any check that moves it reported honestly

Anti-patterns

  • Default standard errors on spatially correlated environmental data ("we clustered by state" when the shock is local)
  • A 20-column robustness table with no map from check to threat ("kitchen-sink robustness")
  • Reporting only that significance survives while the WTP/damage wanders
  • One arbitrary buffer radius / market definition with no sensitivity to it
  • Hiding the weather aggregation or monitor sample that breaks the result
  • Subgroup or regional p-hacking with no MHT correction

Worked vignette (illustrative)

A pollution-mortality estimate is 3.1 deaths per 100k per unit (s.e. 0.9, default SEs). The suite: (i) Conley SEs at a 100 km cutoff widen the CI but keep it from zero; (ii) re-binning the pollution exposure barely moves the point estimate; (iii) restricting to dense-monitor counties yields 3.0; (iv) an honest-DiD bound on the staggered regulation pre-trend leaves the sign intact; (v) Oster δ implies selection on unobservables would need to be 2× selection on observables to nullify it. The welfare number barely moves — the JEEM target.

Branch-specific robustness emphases

  • Hedonic / RP valuation: the binding worries are sorting and market definition — lead with boundary FE, an amenity-shock specification, and buffer/market-boundary sweeps; report Oster δ for selection on unobservables.
  • Stated preference: robustness is about the elicitation — show the scope test, sensitivity to the choice-model specification (conditional vs. mixed vs. latent-class logit), WTP-space vs. preference-space estimation, and protest-response handling.
  • Regulation DiD: honest-DiD bounds on pre-trends, alternative comparison groups, and a Goodman-Bacon decomposition to show no "bad comparisons" drive the result.
  • Climate / weather: alternative weather products and binning, placebo seasons, and spatial-and-serial-correlation-robust SEs; show the result is not an artifact of one gridded dataset.

Each emphasis answers the threat that is first-order for that branch — do not spend the robustness budget on generic checks while the branch's signature worry goes unaddressed.

Output format

text
【Journal】Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
【Skill】jeem-robustness
【Primary spec】declared? [Y/N] — estimate: ___ (s.e. ___)
【Threat → check map】spatial: ___ | market-def: ___ | sorting: ___ | weather-agg: ___ | inference: ___
【Spatial inference】Conley cutoff / clustering: ___
【Design sensitivity】honest-DiD / RD bandwidth / weak-IV set: ___
【Estimate stability】range across checks: [___, ___]; checks that move it: ___
【Source status】verified URL / 待核实 / not asserted
【Next skill】jeem-tables-figures

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-robustness of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jeem Robustness next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jeem Robustness compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jeem Robustness this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill64k—~7.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jeem Robustness

What does Jeem Robustness do?

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive…. Jeem Robustness is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive specification, spatial, sample, and inference choices.

When should I use Jeem Robustness?

Jeem Robustness fits situations like: A Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscripts headline estimate — a damage; treatment effect — must be shown to survive specification; inference choices.

How do I install Jeem Robustness in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-robustness -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-robustness in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jeem-robustness in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jeem Robustness in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-robustness -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-robustness in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jeem-robustness in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jeem Robustness in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-robustness -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jeem-robustness, .gemini/skills/jeem-robustness, .github/skills/jeem-robustness and .opencode/skills/jeem-robustness in your project.

What does Jeem Robustness need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jeem Robustness is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jeem Robustness access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jeem Robustness safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jeem Robustness use?

Jeem Robustness is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jeem Robustness use?

About 2.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 8.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jeem Robustness?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jeem Robustness: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jeem Robustness?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.