A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new…

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Jeem Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jeem-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-rebuttal .claude/skills/jeem-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jeem-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~2.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,211 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new…

  • Works in 6 steps: Build a point-by-point table. Every… → Lead each response with the action, then… → Route new analysis to the right skill.… → …
  • A Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Tone and structure of the…, Reading a JEEM decision letter and Triage and response craft, plus 8 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Jeem Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new spatial/valuation robustness, and writing the response letter the editor and field referees expect. Plans the revision; it loops back to the analysis skills for the actual work.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • A Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter
  • Referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands
  • Planning new spatial/valuation robustness
  • Writing the response letter the editor and field referees expect

Example prompts

  • “/jeem-rebuttal”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Build a point-by-point table. Every referee comment → your action → where in the revision it appears. Editors at JEEM expect a complete…
  2. Lead each response with the action, then the evidence. "We now report Conley spatial SEs at a 100 km cutoff (Table 3); the estimate is…
  3. Route new analysis to the right skill. Spatial/valuation/DiD robustness → jeem-robustness; a contested identification claim →…
  4. Decline with evidence, not attitude. When a referee is wrong (e.g., asks for a check that the design makes irrelevant), show why with a…
  5. Reconcile the two referees explicitly. If R1 wants more structure and R2 wants more reduced-form transparency, state how the revision…
  6. Re-check the welfare claim's honesty. Many JEEM revisions are accepted once the authors bound the claim (marginal not total, local not…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jeem Rebuttal loads about 2.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 89 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,211 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~89
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 1,211 words, ~2,263 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jeem-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jeem-rebuttal
description
Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new spatial/valuation robustness, and writing the response letter the editor and field referees expect. Plans the revision; it loops back to the analysis skills for the actual work.

Rebuttal Strategy (jeem-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • A JEEM R&R, major-revision, or reject-and-resubmit letter has arrived
  • Two referees disagree (a methods referee vs. a policy referee) and you must satisfy both plus the editor
  • A referee demands new spatial SEs, an alternative valuation specification, or a leakage analysis
  • You need to decide what is a must-do versus a polite-decline before drafting responses
  • The headline welfare number moved under a requested check and you must decide how to present it

Tone and structure of the response document

The response is a professional document the editor and referees will reread alongside the revision, so structure it for their convenience. Open with a short cover note summarizing the major changes and where the core demand was addressed. Then reproduce each referee comment verbatim in a quoted block, followed by your response in plain text, followed by a pointer to the exact location in the revision ("see revised Section 4.2 and Table 5"). Keep the register collegial and evidence-led even when a referee erred; the editor is reading for whether you engaged seriously, not whether you won every exchange. Brevity that shows the work beats long defensive prose.

Reading a JEEM decision letter

The editor's letter is the contract — read it first and let it set priorities; referee reports are evidence, the editor's summary is the verdict. At JEEM the typical fault lines are field-specific: a referee will press on sorting/spatial confounding, valuation bias, leakage, or welfare overreach, and the editor will weight whichever threatens the paper's core welfare claim. Separate (1) requests that go to the headline number (must-do), (2) requests that strengthen but do not threaten it (do well), and (3) requests that are wrong or out of scope (decline with evidence).

Triage and response craft

  1. Build a point-by-point table. Every referee comment → your action → where in the revision it appears. Editors at JEEM expect a complete, numbered response; a missed comment reads as evasion.
  2. Lead each response with the action, then the evidence. "We now report Conley spatial SEs at a 100 km cutoff (Table 3); the estimate is unchanged at 4.5%." Not a paragraph of throat-clearing.
  3. Route new analysis to the right skill. Spatial/valuation/DiD robustness → jeem-robustness; a contested identification claim → jeem-identification; a welfare-mapping dispute → jeem-theory-model; new exhibits → jeem-tables-figures. Do the work there, then report it here.
  4. Decline with evidence, not attitude. When a referee is wrong (e.g., asks for a check that the design makes irrelevant), show why with a sentence and a citation; concede the framing even when you reject the request.
  5. Reconcile the two referees explicitly. If R1 wants more structure and R2 wants more reduced-form transparency, state how the revision serves both, so the editor sees you navigated the conflict.
  6. Re-check the welfare claim's honesty. Many JEEM revisions are accepted once the authors bound the claim (marginal not total, local not external) the referees worried about.

Concession as strategy

The strongest JEEM rebuttals concede where the referee is right and bound the damage rather than fighting every point. If a referee shows the welfare gain is smaller once leakage is netted, report the smaller number and show the conclusion survives — a defended $0.8X beats an indefensible $X. If a check moves the estimate, say so and explain why the headline holds. Editors read graceful concession as scientific maturity; reflexive defense of every claim reads as the opposite and makes the editor side with the referee.

Checklist

  • The editor's letter is treated as the priority contract; must-do vs. do-well vs. decline sorted
  • A complete numbered point-by-point response table exists; no comment skipped
  • Each response leads with the action and the evidence (table/figure number, new estimate)
  • New analyses were actually run via the relevant jeem-* skill, not promised
  • Declines are backed by a reason and, where possible, a citation — never dismissive
  • Conflicting referees are reconciled explicitly for the editor
  • The welfare claim is re-bounded where a referee challenged its scope
  • Process/style facts re-verified against the current guide for authors (待核实)
Show full SKILL.md (545 more words)Show less

Mapping the classic JEEM pushback to the revision move

  • "The hedonic still looks like sorting." → Add the boundary-discontinuity or amenity-shock specification to the main text; show parallel pre-trends in price; report the estimate is unchanged.
  • "Your standard errors ignore spatial correlation." → Report Conley SEs at multiple cutoffs in the main results table, not an appendix; note the CI still excludes zero.
  • "The welfare number is overstated." → Re-bound the claim (marginal not total, local not external, PE not GE); restate the policy implication within the bound.
  • "Leakage / reshuffling could flip your sign." → Add the leakage analysis (uncovered-source response, coverage share) and show the net welfare conclusion survives.
  • "The contingent-valuation result has no scope test." → Add or surface the scope test and a hypothetical-bias calibration; report adjusted WTP.
  • "This is weather, not climate." → Separate the short-run shock from the long-run expectation and add the adaptation discussion; restate which estimand the headline number is.

Worked vignette (illustrative)

A reject-and-resubmit on a cap-and-trade paper: R1 (methods) wants the permit-price endogeneity addressed; R2 (policy) wants the distributional incidence; the editor flags leakage as the binding concern. The plan: route the endogeneity to jeem-identification (instrument the cap with a legislated schedule), add a leakage bound to jeem-robustness (uncovered-source emissions response), and add an incidence table via jeem-tables-figures. The response letter leads each point with the new exhibit number and states that the net welfare gain falls from $X to $0.8X once leakage is netted out but stays positive — conceding the magnitude while defending the conclusion.

Track the changes for the editor

A revision that the editor cannot verify quickly invites another round. Provide a clearly marked diff or a changes-highlighted manuscript alongside the clean version, and make every response point to a specific, locatable change (section, table, figure number). For new analyses, state the result inline in the letter so the editor sees the answer without hunting through the paper. The goal is to let a busy editor confirm in one read that each demand was met — that confirmability, as much as the analysis itself, is what converts an R&R into an acceptance.

Anti-patterns

  • Answering referees while ignoring the editor's stated priorities
  • A response that argues in prose but never shows the new number or exhibit
  • Promising analysis in the letter without putting it in the revised paper
  • Dismissing a wrong referee without evidence (the editor sides with the referee by default)
  • Leaving two referees' conflicting demands unreconciled for the editor to untangle
  • Re-asserting an overreaching welfare claim the referees already flagged

Calibrating expectations for the JEEM review cycle

JEEM reviews can be slow and instruments more than one round of revision is common; plan for it rather than treating the first R&R as the last word. Three practical calibrations: (1) a "major revision" that asks for new identification work is a genuine invitation, not a soft reject — invest in it. (2) A "reject and resubmit" is treated as a fresh submission and may incur the fee again (待核实) — confirm before resubmitting, and make the new version substantially stronger, not cosmetically changed. (3) If a referee's demand would turn the paper into a different (e.g., methods-only) contribution, raise it with the editor rather than silently complying — the editor protects the paper's core welfare claim and can adjudicate scope creep.

Output format

text
【Journal】Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
【Skill】jeem-rebuttal
【Editor priority】the core demand from the editor's letter
【Triage】must-do: ___ | do-well: ___ | decline-with-evidence: ___
【New analysis routed to】jeem-robustness / jeem-identification / jeem-theory-model / jeem-tables-figures
【Referee reconciliation】how R1 and R2 are both served
【Welfare claim】re-bounded where challenged? [Y/N]
【Source status】verified URL / 待核实 / not asserted
【Next skill】loop to the routed analysis skill, then jeem-submission for the resubmission

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jeem Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jeem Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jeem Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Performance Review Writergithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Taipei Permit Drawing Standardsh30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB158—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassCC-BY-SA-4.0
Rebuttal Writing Guidewentorai/research-plugins2981 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.9k11 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Performance Review Writer

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice.

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.2k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Taipei Permit Drawing Standards

    h30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB

    This skill should be used when preparing, reviewing, or indexing Taipei City building permit drawing sets (A101-A7), verifying the 44-item application document checklist, setting up N-prefix…

    158 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Rebuttal Writing Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Write effective rebuttals to reviewer comments for journal submissions

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jeem Rebuttal

What does Jeem Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new…. Jeem Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new spatial/valuation robustness, and writing the response letter the editor and field referees expect.

When should I use Jeem Rebuttal?

Jeem Rebuttal fits situations like: A Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter; referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands; planning new spatial/valuation robustness; writing the response letter the editor and field referees expect.

How do I install Jeem Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jeem-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jeem Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jeem-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jeem Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeem-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jeem-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jeem-rebuttal, .github/skills/jeem-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jeem-rebuttal in your project.

What does Jeem Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jeem Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jeem Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jeem Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jeem Rebuttal use?

Jeem Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jeem Rebuttal use?

About 2.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jeem Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jeem Rebuttal: Performance Review Writer (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Taipei Permit Drawing Standards (h30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB, 158 stars), Rebuttal Writing Guide (wentorai/research-plugins, 298 stars) and Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jeem Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.