Marketing Psychology
freekmurze/dotfiles
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing.
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really…
Install Jcp Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process .claude/skills/jcp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jcp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process into .claude/skills/jcp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process .agents/skills/jcp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process into .agents/skills/jcp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process .cursor/skills/jcp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jcp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process into .cursor/skills/jcp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process .gemini/skills/jcp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process into .gemini/skills/jcp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process .github/skills/jcp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process into .github/skills/jcp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process .opencode/skills/jcp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process into .opencode/skills/jcp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jcp-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 580 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really…
- Calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How JCP review works, Reading the letter for the… and Calibrating effort and timeline, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- The area-editor/reviewer model
What it does
Jcp Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really means, R&R norms, and the new-studies expectation. Sets expectations and revision strategy; the response letter itself is jcp-rebuttal.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Marketing & SEO, covering Marketing psychology. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds
- The area-editor/reviewer model
- What process is thin really means
- The new-studies expectation
Example prompts
- “process is thin”
- “/jcp-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jcp Review Process loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 580 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 580 words, ~1,236 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jcp-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jcp-review-process
- description
- Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really means, R&R norms, and the new-studies expectation. Sets expectations and revision strategy; the response letter itself is jcp-rebuttal.
Review Process (jcp-review-process)
When to trigger
- A decision letter arrived and you must read what the editor actually wants
- You are weighing whether the requested revision is feasible (new studies?) or a polite reject
- You want realistic odds before submitting, or before investing in another study
- Reviewers raise the same complaint ("the process isn't established") and you need a strategy
- Deciding whether to push back, comply, or withdraw and reroute to a sibling
How JCP review works
A JCP submission goes to the editor (EiC David Wooten through 2026, with Co-Editors Rajesh Bagchi and Aparna Labroo; Bagchi becomes EiC for 2027–2029 — verified 2026-06-22, re-verify the masthead), who may desk-reject for fit (no psychological process, wrong outlet, out of scope) or assign it to an area/associate editor who recruits reviewers — typically several SCP-community experts under double-blind review (confirm the exact model on the current Wiley/myscp author page). The editor synthesizes the reviews into a decision: reject, major revision (R&R), minor revision, or accept. As at peer experimental journals, the most common positive outcome is a major revision, and at JCP that very often means running new studies — not just reanalysis — to nail down the process.
Outcomes to plan for:
| Decision | What it usually means | Your move |
|---|---|---|
| Desk reject | Fit/process problem the editor saw immediately | reroute (jcp-topic-selection) or rebuild the mechanism (jcp-theory-development) |
| Reject after review | Core process claim not believed, or fatal confound | major rebuild or reroute; rarely worth appealing |
| Major revision (R&R) | The process is promising but not yet proven | plan new studies; this is the modal "good" outcome |
| Minor revision | Mechanism convincing; polish and clarify | comply tightly; do not reopen settled issues |
Reading the letter for the binding constraint
- "Effect in search of a process / mechanism unclear" — the central JCP demand. Expect to add a manipulated-mediator or moderation-of-process study. This is the make-or-break.
- "Alternative explanation not ruled out" — design a study (or moderation) that your process predicts and the rival does not.
- "Underpowered / not pre-registered / robustness" — replicate at higher power, pre-register the confirmatory follow-up.
- "Stimulus-bound / generalizability" — add operationalizations, populations, or a consequential DV.
- Editor's own framing — weight the editor's summary above any single reviewer; that is the contract for the revision.
Show full SKILL.md (219 more words)Show less
Calibrating effort and timeline
- A JCP R&R commonly requires months of new data collection; budget the studies before promising them.
- If the editor signals the process concern is fundamental (not "add a study" but "the mechanism may be wrong"), assess honestly whether a fix exists before sinking another study in.
- If two strong reviewers disagree, let the editor's letter arbitrate; do not try to satisfy a reviewer the editor has discounted.
- A polite "we'd consider a substantially different paper" is a reject; treat it as one.
Checklist
- You have identified the editor's binding concern, not just listed all reviewer points
- You have judged whether the R&R needs new studies and which ones
- For each major comment, there is a feasible study or analysis (not just prose)
- The process/alternative-explanation demands have concrete experimental answers planned
- You have a realistic timeline for new data collection before committing
- You can tell an honest R&R from a soft reject and act accordingly
Anti-patterns
- Reanalysis-only response to a "mechanism unclear" letter that clearly needs a new study
- Reviewer-by-reviewer firefighting that ignores the editor's synthesized priority
- Over-promising studies you cannot run in the revision window
- Appealing a fit desk-reject instead of rerouting to the right outlet
- Treating a soft reject as an R&R and pouring months into a paper the editor has closed
Output format
【Decision type】desk reject / reject / major R&R / minor / accept
【Editor's binding concern】the one thing the revision must fix
【New studies needed?】yes (which) / no (reanalysis suffices)
【Alternative-explanation plan】study or moderation that adjudicates
【Timeline realism】can the studies run in the window? [Y/N]
【Go / no-go】revise / reroute / withdraw
【Next skill】jcp-rebuttal© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jcp Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jcp Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Marketing Psychologyfreekmurze/dotfiles | 1k | 22 repos | ~5.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Cold Email Sequence Generatornicepkg/auto-company | 195 | 3 repos | ~4.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Ugcfal-ai-community/skills | 251 | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Landing Optimizeraaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills | 2.9k | — | ~3.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Social Proof Architectsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Cold Email Sequence Generator
nicepkg/auto-company
Generate personalized cold email sequences (7-14 emails) with A/B test subject lines, follow-up timing recommendations, and integrated social proof.
Ugc
fal-ai-community/skills
Plan and run UGC-style creator ads and social proof videos with genmedia.
Landing Optimizer
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
A skill your agent uses when the user asks to "optimize our landing page for influencer traffic", "fix our promo-code landing page", or "improve conversion from a creator campaign"; produces a…
Social Proof Architect
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
One sentence - what this skill does and when to invoke it. An agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.
Testimonial Collector
BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills
Systematically gather, score, and format client testimonials.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jcp Review Process
What does Jcp Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really…. Jcp Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really means, R&R norms, and the new-studies expectation.
When should I use Jcp Review Process?
Jcp Review Process fits situations like: calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds; the area-editor/reviewer model; what process is thin really means; the new-studies expectation.
How do I install Jcp Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jcp-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jcp Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jcp-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jcp Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jcp-review-process, .gemini/skills/jcp-review-process, .github/skills/jcp-review-process and .opencode/skills/jcp-review-process in your project.
What does Jcp Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jcp Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jcp Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jcp Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jcp Review Process use?
Jcp Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jcp Review Process use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jcp Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jcp Review Process: Marketing Psychology (freekmurze/dotfiles, 1k stars), Cold Email Sequence Generator (nicepkg/auto-company, 195 stars), Ugc (fal-ai-community/skills, 251 stars) and Landing Optimizer (aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills, 2.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jcp Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.