Claude Academy Guide
anthropics/skills
Adds a matching Claude Academy course, tutorial or use case to the end of an answer about learning to use Claude, but only when the match is strong.
A skill your agent uses when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Jams Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process .claude/skills/jams-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jams-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process into .claude/skills/jams-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jams-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process .agents/skills/jams-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jams-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process into .agents/skills/jams-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jams-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process .cursor/skills/jams-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jams-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process into .cursor/skills/jams-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jams-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process .gemini/skills/jams-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jams-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process into .gemini/skills/jams-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jams-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process .github/skills/jams-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jams-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process into .github/skills/jams-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jams-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process .opencode/skills/jams-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jams-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process into .opencode/skills/jams-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jams-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jams-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.9k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 837 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental…
- Understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How JAMS review works, Likely decisions and Reading the decision letter, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- The double-anonymized developmental review
What it does
Jams Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jams-rebuttal).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow
- The double-anonymized developmental review
- The area-editor structure
- The dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar
Example prompts
- “/jams-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jams Review Process loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 102 tokens; SKILL.md has 837 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 837 words, ~1,859 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jams-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jams-review-process
- description
- Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jams-rebuttal).
Review Process (jams-review-process)
When to trigger
- Before submitting, to set realistic expectations about JAMS review
- A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it before responding
- You are unsure who decides at JAMS and what reviewers are told to weigh
- You want to know what conditional acceptance triggers (data/code deposit)
How JAMS review works
- Double-anonymized. Authors and reviewers are concealed from each other; keep every round anonymized, including revised files and any preregistration links.
- Developmental philosophy. JAMS, like the AMS journals, runs a developmental review — area editors and reviewers aim to improve promising papers across rounds, not merely gatekeep. A well-run R&R is the realistic best case; first-round acceptance is essentially unheard of.
- Decision structure. Manuscripts are handled by an Area / Associate Editor under the Co-Editors-in-Chief (Stephanie M. Noble and Charles H. Noble, University of Tennessee, since June 2024 — verified 2026-06-22; re-verify the masthead before submission). Your keyword/area choices in Editorial Manager influence routing, so choose them to reach the right editor and reviewers.
- What reviewers weigh. JAMS's evaluation is dual: (1) a genuine theoretical contribution to a broad marketing-science question, and (2) a clear managerial contribution — what a decision maker should do. Expect probes on construct validity / CMV (survey), endogeneity / identification (secondary data), mechanism and power (experiments), and on whether the contribution is more than a new-context replication.
- Integrity. Springer plagiarism screening; no concurrent submission; research-data and ethics policies apply.
Likely decisions
| Decision | What it means |
|---|---|
| Desk reject | Out of scope, not a broad marketing-science contribution, or no managerial relevance |
| Reject (after review) | Theoretical or managerial contribution, or identification/validity, judged insufficient |
| Major revision (R&R) | Promising core; substantial work required (often multi-round) |
| Minor revision | Contribution sound; targeted fixes |
| Conditional acceptance | Triggers final transparency steps — data/code availability statement and any required deposit |
Reading the decision letter
- Read the AE/editor letter first — it states the path to acceptance and which concerns are decisive ("must address") versus secondary.
- Cluster reviewer comments by theme: theoretical contribution, managerial relevance, construct validity/measurement, identification/analysis, positioning, exposition.
- Flag the gatekeeping themes — any comment touching the theoretical-contribution or managerial-relevance bar is top priority; these are JAMS's twin gates.
- Separate new-data/analysis requests from reframing requests — they have very different timelines.
- Anticipate transparency — if nearing conditional acceptance, prepare the data/code availability statement and any repository deposit.
Calibrate expectations before you submit
- First-round R&R, not acceptance, is the goal. JAMS's developmental review means most successful papers go through two or more revision rounds; budget months, not weeks, between rounds.
- Desk-reject risk is highest on scope and relevance. A paper that is narrow, modeling-first, purely consumer-psychology, or missing a managerial implication is the most common early casualty — fix fit (
jams-topic-selection) before submitting. - Reviewer continuity matters. The same reviewers usually see your revision, so a response that visibly addresses their concern (not a generic improvement) is what advances the paper.
- Routing is partly in your hands. Keyword and area-of-interest choices in Editorial Manager steer the manuscript toward an area editor whose domain matches the paper; a mismatch slows the process and risks an unsympathetic read.
Show full SKILL.md (335 more words)Show less
Where JAMS differs from the siblings' processes
- vs. JM (AMA): JM is double-anonymized via ScholarOne with a Coeditor structure and a hard page limit; JAMS runs on Springer Editorial Manager with an area-editor structure and article-type guidance rather than one fixed page cap.
- vs. JMR: JMR enforces exact three-digit p-values and a Web Appendix convention; JAMS emphasizes construct validity and the managerial contribution more than a single statistics-reporting rule.
- vs. Marketing Science / JCR: those weigh modeling rigor or consumer-theory depth respectively; JAMS will not accept a paper strong on one of those but thin on the managerial takeaway.
After the decision: the immediate moves
- Desk reject: re-evaluate fit before resubmitting elsewhere — a scope/relevance desk reject usually means the paper needs
jams-topic-selectionandjams-contribution-framingwork, not a quick reformat. - Reject after review: mine the reports for the decisive flaw; if it is fixable (identification, validity, a missing study), the work may suit a sibling or a later JAMS resubmission as a new paper — but do not re-submit the same paper to JAMS without a fundamental change.
- R&R (major/minor): move straight to
jams-rebuttal; revise the manuscript before drafting the letter, and lead with the editor's decisive concerns. - Conditional acceptance: finalize the data/code availability statement and any repository deposit, confirm declarations, and complete the production checklist.
Throughout, keep the manuscript and all correspondence anonymized until a decision releases that requirement; reviewers see your revisions, and a slip that reveals identity can compromise the round.
Checklist
- AE/editor letter parsed: decisive vs. secondary concerns identified
- Reviewer comments clustered by theme
- Theoretical-contribution and managerial-relevance comments flagged top priority
- New-data vs. reframing requests separated for timeline planning
- Validity/identification concerns (CMV, endogeneity) mapped to specific fixes
- Conditional-acceptance transparency steps anticipated (data/code statement)
Anti-patterns
- Treating all reviewer comments as equal, ignoring the editor's stated priorities
- De-anonymizing yourself in a response or a revised file
- Reading a major R&R as a near-accept and doing superficial edits
- Neglecting the managerial-contribution comments because the theory comments feel weightier
- Deferring data/code-availability prep until after conditional acceptance
Output format
【Decision】desk reject / reject / major R&R / minor / conditional accept
【Editor priorities】must-address: [...]; secondary: [...]
【Comment clusters】theory / managerial / measurement / identification / positioning / exposition
【Gatekeeper flags】theoretical + managerial contribution comments: [...]
【New data vs. reframing】[...]
【Transparency next】data/code availability + deposit readiness: [...]
【Next step】jams-rebuttal© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jams Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jams Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Claude Academy Guideanthropics/skills | 180k | 3 repos | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Video Understandcalesthio/OpenMontage | 66k | — | ~841 | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | |
| Understand ExplainEgonex-AI/Understand-Anything | 86k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Understanding by Design PlannerTHU-MAIC/OpenMAIC | 40k | — | ~548 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Understand Diff AnalysisEgonex-AI/Understand-Anything | 86k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
Video Understand
calesthio/OpenMontage
Understand video content locally using ffmpeg frame extraction and Whisper transcription.
Understand Explain
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything
Gives an in-depth explanation of one file, function or module by reading the project's knowledge graph and checking that the graph is still fresh.
Understanding by Design Planner
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC
Plans an OpenMAIC lesson or course series by backward design: enduring understandings and essential questions first, then performance evidence, then learning activities.
Understand Diff Analysis
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything
Reads your git changes or a pull request against a prebuilt knowledge graph of the project to explain what changed, which components are affected and what is risky.
Understand Issue
mastra-ai/mastra
Investigate a GitHub issue or reported bug the way a seasoned maintainer would — form an independent model before reading the thread's theories, trace the mechanism and history, verify the…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Jams Review Process
What does Jams Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental…. Jams Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter.
When should I use Jams Review Process?
Jams Review Process fits situations like: understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow; the double-anonymized developmental review; the area-editor structure; the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar.
How do I install Jams Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jams-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jams Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jams-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jams Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jams-review-process, .gemini/skills/jams-review-process, .github/skills/jams-review-process and .opencode/skills/jams-review-process in your project.
What does Jams Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jams Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jams Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jams Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jams Review Process use?
Jams Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jams Review Process use?
About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jams Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jams Review Process: Claude Academy Guide (anthropics/skills, 180k stars), Video Understand (calesthio/OpenMontage, 66k stars), Understand Explain (Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything, 86k stars) and Understanding by Design Planner (THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC, 40k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jams Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.