A skill your agent uses when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Issta Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill issta-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills issta-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ISSTA-Skills/skills/issta-author-response .claude/skills/issta-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
issta-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
481 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject…

  • Works in 4 steps: State the decision-critical correction… → Point to the exact table, figure,… → Explain the consequence for the claim:… → …
  • Drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window
  • SKILL.md covers Triage, Drafting pattern, Reviewer pushback patterns and From reviews to a…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Issta Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model, converting reviewer asks into a revision ledger, anonymity in the response, and the difference between a rebuttal claim and a promised change.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window
  • Planning a Major-Revision resubmission
  • Covering evidence-anchored replies
  • The Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model

Example prompts

  • “/issta-author-response”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line of each reply.
  2. Point to the exact table, figure, section, or artifact path that already answers it.
  3. Explain the consequence for the claim: what still holds, what you will scope down.
  4. Promise only changes that fit the outcome — a camera-ready wording fix for an Accept-leaning

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Issta Author Response loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 90 tokens; SKILL.md has 481 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~90
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 481 words, ~1,118 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/issta-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
issta-author-response
description
Use when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model, converting reviewer asks into a revision ledger, anonymity in the response, and the difference between a rebuttal claim and a promised change.

ISSTA Author Response

Use this after ISSTA reviews are released. ISSTA's response step feeds a decision that is not just accept/reject: a first-round paper can be told to submit a Major Revision, so the response and the revision plan are two connected artifacts. Reopen the current author-response and major-revision instructions before drafting, because the dates and mechanics are cycle-specific.

Triage

  • Answer concerns that move the decision: soundness of the technique, fairness of the evaluation, scope of the claims, comparison to related work, and verifiability. Cosmetic complaints come last.
  • Use submitted evidence — paper sections, tables, the artifact, threats-to-validity discussion. Do not promise experiments you have not run unless you can run them within a Major-Revision window.
  • Keep the response anonymous. Do not reveal institution, tool name if it de-anonymizes, repository ownership, or grant numbers in the rebuttal text.
  • Separate a rebuttal correction (the reviewer misread something already in the paper) from a promised change (something you will add). Label which is which so the meta-reviewer can weigh the paper as-is against the paper-if-revised.
  • If the review budget is tight, spend it on the one objection that, unaddressed, sinks the paper — usually an evaluation-validity or missing-baseline concern.

Drafting pattern

  1. State the decision-critical correction or concession in the first line of each reply.
  2. Point to the exact table, figure, section, or artifact path that already answers it.
  3. Explain the consequence for the claim: what still holds, what you will scope down.
  4. Promise only changes that fit the outcome — a camera-ready wording fix for an Accept-leaning paper, a concrete new experiment only if a Major-Revision window exists.
Show full SKILL.md (214 more words)Show less

Reviewer pushback patterns

PushbackWhat it signalsISSTA-ready reply
"Evaluated only on your own subjects"External-validity doubtPoint to the labelled benchmark and its provenance, or commit to adding an established one (Defects4J, real CVEs) in revision
"Baseline is not configured fairly"Comparison-validity doubtCite the equal-budget setup, or concede and re-run the baseline under the reviewer's configuration
"Improvement is within noise"Statistical-significance doubtReference the non-parametric test and effect size, or add repeated runs in revision
"Cannot tell if the artifact reproduces this"Verifiability doubtPoint to the entry script and logged outputs, or fix the README before the artifact deadline

From reviews to a Major-Revision ledger

When the outcome is Major Revision, convert every review comment into a tracked row: the comment, the change, where it lands in the paper, and its status. The resubmission's cover letter walks this ledger; reviewers who see each of their points addressed in order revise upward.

text
[R2.3] "No comparison to reversed-order rerunning."
  -> Added reversed-order baseline at equal budget; Table 2, rows 4-6. STATUS: done
[R1.1] "Shared-state model undefined for native calls."
  -> Scoped native state out explicitly; Section 3.1, threats. STATUS: done
[R3.2] "Overhead not reported."
  -> Added per-project overhead; Table 3. STATUS: in progress

Discussion-phase calibration

  • Reply precisely and early; ISSTA response windows are short and a focused rebuttal beats an exhaustive one.
  • Never paste a whole new results section into the response box; summarize the finding and anchor it to submitted or clearly-promised material.
  • Do not argue tone. Convert a hostile review into the technical objection underneath it and answer that.

Output format

text
[Priority issue] <reviewer concern>
[Decision dimension] soundness / evaluation / scope / related-work / verifiability
[Reply type] rebuttal correction / promised change
[Draft reply] <anonymous, evidence-anchored text>
[Evidence anchor] <table/figure/section/artifact path>
[Revision-ledger row] <comment -> change -> location -> status>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ISSTA-Skills/skills/issta-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Issta Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Issta Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Issta Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill64k—~7.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Issta Author Response

What does Issta Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject…. Issta Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window or planning a Major-Revision resubmission, covering evidence-anchored replies, the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model, converting reviewer asks into a revision ledger, anonymity in the response, and the difference between a rebuttal claim and a promised change.

When should I use Issta Author Response?

Issta Author Response fits situations like: drafting an ISSTA author response for the rebuttal window; planning a Major-Revision resubmission; covering evidence-anchored replies; the Accept/Major-Revision/Reject outcome model.

How do I install Issta Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill issta-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ISSTA-Skills/skills/issta-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/issta-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Issta Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill issta-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ISSTA-Skills/skills/issta-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/issta-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Issta Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill issta-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/issta-author-response, .gemini/skills/issta-author-response, .github/skills/issta-author-response and .opencode/skills/issta-author-response in your project.

What does Issta Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Issta Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Issta Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Issta Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Issta Author Response use?

Issta Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Issta Author Response use?

About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Issta Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Issta Author Response: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Issta Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.