A skill your agent uses when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy…

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Ipsn Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ipsn-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-author-response .claude/skills/ipsn-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ipsn-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
470 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy…

  • Drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal
  • SKILL.md covers Triage, The rebuttal itself, Reviewer pushback patterns… and Anonymity in the rebuttal…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth

What it does

Ipsn Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy accounting, and simulation-vs-real-hardware doubts, without leaking identity and without promising experiments not yet run.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Accounting and bookkeeping. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal
  • Covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth
  • Baseline fairness
  • Deployment realism

Example prompts

  • “/ipsn-author-response”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ipsn Author Response loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 470 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~79
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 470 words, ~1,175 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ipsn-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ipsn-author-response
description
Use when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy accounting, and simulation-vs-real-hardware doubts, without leaking identity and without promising experiments not yet run.

IPSN Author Response

Use this after IPSN-lineage reviews are released. IPSN is conference-style: a short, decision-focused rebuttal (verify the window and format on the current successor call), not a journal-style revise-and-resubmit letter. The rebuttal must stay double-blind — no author names, institutions, lab-named testbeds, or identity-revealing dataset/firmware links — and it must answer on the axes a sensor-systems reviewer actually raised.

Triage

  • Answer what affects the decision: evidence realism (simulation vs real hardware), soundness of the method/platform, baseline fairness, ground-truth validity, deployment honesty, and energy/latency accounting.
  • Use evidence that already exists or a number you can compute from data you already have — never a vague promise to run an experiment.
  • Correct factual misreadings first; a reviewer who misread an energy table or a yield number is often persuadable.
  • Keep every word anonymous. Do not name your board, testbed, institution, or a resolvable dataset DOI, even to strengthen a point.

The rebuttal itself

Short and decision-focused. One decision-critical point per reviewer beats an exhaustive reply. Concede what is true, correct what is misread, and point to exactly where the answer lives in the submitted paper or artifact. Do not paste large new results the reviewers cannot verify in the window.

text
[R1 - "simulation only"]  -> Point to the real-hardware result already in §4.2 / Table 3 (measured on
                             the MCU), which the review may have missed; state the platform and clock.
[R2 - "baseline untuned"] -> Report the equal-condition comparison already logged; give the number and
                             where it lives; if a tuning was fixed, say the budget was equal and documented.
[R3 - "ground truth?"]    -> Name the surveyed reference and its own error; correct the misread that the
                             ground truth came from the model under test.

Reviewer pushback patterns (sensor-systems flavored)

PushbackWhat it signalsIPSN-ready response
"Only simulated / no real hardware"Evidence-realism doubt (often fatal)Point to the on-device/in-field result if it exists; if it truly doesn't, concede and scope the claim rather than promise it
"Baseline is not a real alternative / untuned"Soundness doubt about the comparisonReport the equal-condition numbers; name the tuning budget
"Energy is estimated, not measured"Accounting doubtPoint to the instrumented-rail measurement and conditions; if only estimated, say so and bound it
"Deployment numbers look idealized"Honesty doubtReport yield, sync error, and failures as measured; do not sand off the losses
"Ground truth is circular / weak"Construct doubtName the independent reference and its error; state the residual limit
"Wrong track / out of scope"Track or venue mismatchClarify the primary contribution's track; hard to fully fix in rebuttal
Show full SKILL.md (132 more words)Show less

Anonymity in the rebuttal (easy to slip)

  • Refer to your own prior work in the third person, as in the paper.
  • Describe artifact/firmware changes without linking to an identity-revealing repository; use the anonymized location.
  • Do not thank a named collaborator, funder, or facility inside the rebuttal.
  • Do not paste a board photo or a dataset DOI that reveals the lab.

Calibration

  • Respond to the criterion the reviewer actually raised, not the one you would rather defend.
  • The PC discussion decides; write the rebuttal as evidence for an advocate, and let the measured evidence already in the paper carry the argument.
  • IPSN is not a Major-Revision venue: there is usually no guaranteed second read, so a rebuttal that promises future experiments rarely helps. Confirm the current mechanics on the successor call.

Output format

text
[Turn] rebuttal (conference-style; confirm window/format on the current call)
[Priority issue] <reviewer concern>
[Decision dimension] evidence-realism / soundness / baseline / ground-truth / deployment-honesty / energy
[Answer] <where the answer lives in paper/artifact, or the honest concession + scope>
[Anonymity check] <no identity leak, incl. board photos / testbed names / dataset DOIs: passed/issues>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Ipsn Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ipsn Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ipsn Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sync Upstreamnyaruka/phonenumbers1.6k—~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Radiology Tablehuang-sir1/radiology-skills1.9k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
ERPClaw ERP Controlleravansaber/erpclaw116—~18kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
Odoo Agency Fleet Reviewerpipe-org/mcp-odoo421—~699Automated safety check: PassMIT
Beancount Closebex-co/beancount-io296—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Sync Upstream

    nyaruka/phonenumbers

    Sync this Go port with a new upstream google/libphonenumber release — regenerate the embedded metadata and reconcile the ported Java logic.

    1.6k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Radiology Table

    huang-sir1/radiology-skills

    Create/audit editable publication tables with source reconciliation; not figures or statistical inference.

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 19 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • ERPClaw ERP Controller

    avansaber/erpclaw

    Operates the ERPClaw self-hosted ERP in plain language: accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, HR, payroll and reports, treating the ERP as the single source of truth.

    116 GitHub stars~18k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Odoo Agency Fleet Review

    erpipe-org/mcp-odoo

    Review many client Odoo databases at once through odoo-mcp's cross-instance tools — fleet-wide accounting health, per-client aging, partial-failure triage — for agencies and partners managing 5–50…

    421 GitHub stars~699 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Beancount Close

    bex-co/beancount-io

    Close an accounting period in a Beancount ledger by reconciling each active account through beancount-reconcile, checking assertions and recurring gaps, reviewing flags, then proposing a commit with…

    296 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Forward Implementation First

    Vuk97/forward-implementation-first

    Keeps an agent building and validating real output instead of servicing its own bookkeeping.

    176 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ipsn Author Response

What does Ipsn Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy…. Ipsn Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy accounting, and simulation-vs-real-hardware doubts, without leaking identity and without promising experiments not yet run.

When should I use Ipsn Author Response?

Ipsn Author Response fits situations like: drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal; covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth; baseline fairness; deployment realism.

How do I install Ipsn Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ipsn-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ipsn Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ipsn-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ipsn Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ipsn-author-response, .gemini/skills/ipsn-author-response, .github/skills/ipsn-author-response and .opencode/skills/ipsn-author-response in your project.

What does Ipsn Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ipsn Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ipsn Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ipsn Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ipsn Author Response use?

Ipsn Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ipsn Author Response use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ipsn Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ipsn Author Response: Sync Upstream (nyaruka/phonenumbers, 1.6k stars), Radiology Table (huang-sir1/radiology-skills, 1.9k stars), ERPClaw ERP Controller (avansaber/erpclaw, 116 stars) and Odoo Agency Fleet Review (erpipe-org/mcp-odoo, 421 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ipsn Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.