Agent skill

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award, covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware, board files…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Ipsn Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ipsn-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ipsn-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
623 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award, covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware, board files…

  • Packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award
  • SKILL.md covers Badges and the award (verify…, What sensor-systems evaluators…, Packaging plan and Anonymized review artifact vs.…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware

What it does

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award, covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware, board files, datasets), what sensor-systems evaluators check first, DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof documentation for a physical system, and the separate post-acceptance timing.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award
  • Covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware
  • What sensor-systems evaluators check first
  • DOI-issuing archives

Example prompts

  • “/ipsn-artifact-evaluation”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 623 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~92
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 623 words, ~1,536 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ipsn-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award, covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware, board files, datasets), what sensor-systems evaluators check first, DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof documentation for a physical system, and the separate post-acceptance timing.

IPSN Artifact Evaluation

Use this for the artifact track. IPSN had a strong artifact culture — a Best Research Artifact Award alongside the Best Paper Award — and its artifacts are unusual because they mix hardware, firmware, and data, not just code. Two things to internalize: badges and the award are earned by evaluators actually using your package, and the review artifact (anonymized, for the paper's reviewers) is not the same deliverable as the public artifact (de-anonymized, DOI-archived). Because IPSN merged into SenSys, confirm the current badge set, the award's persistence, and the deadline on the successor call (待核实).

Badges and the award (verify the current set)

TargetWhat it certifiesWhat earns it
Artifacts Available (ACM)The artifact is permanently, publicly retrievableDeposit in a DOI-issuing archive (Zenodo, IEEE DataPort, figshare, Software Heritage)
Artifacts Evaluated - FunctionalThe artifact runs and does what the paper saysA clean-machine (or emulated) install, a demo, documented expected outputs
Artifacts Evaluated - ReusableOthers can build on itThe Functional bar plus careful docs, structure, licensing, and board/firmware detail
Results ReproducedAn evaluator reproduced key resultsA turnkey analysis path from raw traces to the headline numbers
IPSN Best Research Artifact AwardCommunity recognition of an exceptional artifactA package an evaluator can genuinely run and reuse, hardware caveats stated honestly

Available is low-cost, high-value (archive the package). Functional/Reusable/Reproduced require the evaluator's own run to succeed — and for sensor systems, the failure mode is usually "needs hardware we don't have," so a software/analysis path that reproduces from logged traces is what keeps the artifact usable when the board is not on the evaluator's bench.

What sensor-systems evaluators open first

Claim typeFirst thing inspectedCommon failure caught
An estimator / IP methodThe scripts that turn raw traces into the paper's figuresNumbers in the PDF that no script reproduces
A platform / SPOTS toolThe firmware build + a run on real or emulated hardwareUndocumented toolchain; only-builds-on-authors'-bench
A datasetThe raw traces + the extraction/processing scripts + ground truthData shipped without the ground truth or the processing
An on-device modelFirmware + quantized model + a way to run inferenceRequires the exact board and undocumented setup
A deploymentRaw traces + analysis, with a clear "needs the site" statementIn-field numbers no evaluator can approach

Assume an evaluator gives your package a bounded time budget and may not have your hardware. Design the analysis path to succeed on any machine; design the hardware path to be honest about what it needs.

Show full SKILL.md (212 more words)Show less

Packaging plan

text
[Analysis path]  a turnkey script set that regenerates each figure from logged raw traces, on any machine
[Firmware]       sources + build instructions + pinned toolchain (compiler/SDK/RTOS) + board revision
[Hardware]       BOM / board files, and a clear "you will need X" statement where the board is required
[Data]           raw traces + the ground-truth reference (with its error) + calibration data
[Mapping]        an explicit table: paper claim -> script/firmware -> expected result
[Harness]        the energy/latency measurement setup and conditions, so numbers can be re-measured
[License]        an OSI-approved license for code, an open data license for datasets
[Archive]        DOI-issuing repository for the Available badge (Zenodo / IEEE DataPort / figshare)

Anonymized review artifact vs. public artifact

  • At submission: anonymized for the paper's reviewers — no owner strings, lab-named testbeds, board silkscreen logos, or identity-revealing dataset DOIs; scrub scope-screenshot watermarks.
  • After acceptance: replace anonymized placeholders with the public, licensed, DOI-issuing archive; this is the version evaluators badge, the award judges assess, and the camera-ready cites.

Worked vignette: packaging an on-device sensing artifact

A paper contributes a TinyML detector and a deployment. To target Reusable, Reproduced, and the award: ship firmware sources with a pinned toolchain and board revision; a reproduce/ directory whose scripts regenerate every figure from the bundled raw traces on any laptop; the quantized model and a way to run inference (on the board or an emulator); the labeled field traces with ground-truth error stated; the power-measurement harness and conditions; an MIT/Apache code license and an open data license; and a DOI archive. State honestly which results are turnkey (analysis from traces) and which need the physical board or the deployment site.

Calibration

  • The artifact process is typically post-acceptance with its own deadline; do not conflate it with the camera-ready. Confirm the successor's timing and whether the Best Research Artifact Award persists (待核实).
  • Badge names, the exact set, and whether evaluation is single- or double-anonymous vary by cycle.

Output format

text
[Target] Available / Functional / Reusable / Reproduced / Best Research Artifact Award
[Artifact role] anonymized review artifact / public DOI-archived artifact
[Contents] <firmware / BOM / traces / ground truth / harness / license>
[Analysis path] does figure regeneration from logged traces succeed on any machine? yes/no
[Hardware honesty] is "you will need X hardware" stated clearly? yes/no
[Claim mapping] <claim -> script/firmware -> expected result present? yes/no>
[Fixes before upload] <ordered list>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ipsn Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Sigcomm Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Socc Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SIGCOMM paper's code, traces, topologies, and configuration for the artifact-evaluation committee — choosing ACM badges (Artifacts Available, Evaluated…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SIGMETRICS artifact for the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme (Artifacts Available, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced)…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Socc Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SoCC artifact for the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme (Artifacts Available, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced), covering what…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mobisys Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ipsn Artifact Evaluation

What does Ipsn Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award, covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware, board files…. Ipsn Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award, covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware, board files, datasets), what sensor-systems evaluators check first, DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof documentation for a physical system, and the separate post-acceptance timing.

When should I use Ipsn Artifact Evaluation?

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: packaging an IPSN-lineage artifact for the ACM badges and the IPSN Best Research Artifact Award; covering hardware-plus-software artifacts (firmware; what sensor-systems evaluators check first; DOI-issuing archives.

How do I install Ipsn Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ipsn Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ipsn Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ipsn-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/ipsn-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Ipsn Artifact Evaluation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ipsn Artifact Evaluation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ipsn Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ipsn Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ipsn Artifact Evaluation use?

Ipsn Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ipsn Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ipsn Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ipsn Artifact Evaluation: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ipsn Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.