Agent skill

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Interspeech Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill interspeech-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills interspeech-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/INTERSPEECH-Skills/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
interspeech-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
680 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready…

  • Audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review
  • SKILL.md covers The speech-specific artifact set, Anonymous demo pages without…, Voice data is personal data and Minimum viable recipe, plus 4 more sections
  • Calls git
  • Public release at camera-ready

What it does

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready, checkpoint and recipe distribution, voice-data licensing and speaker-consent hygiene, and the ethics of releasing synthesis or cloning systems.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review
  • Public release at camera-ready
  • Checkpoint and recipe distribution
  • Voice-data licensing and speaker-consent hygiene

Example prompts

  • “/interspeech-artifact-evaluation”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 88 tokens; SKILL.md has 680 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~88
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 680 words, ~1,582 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
interspeech-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready, checkpoint and recipe distribution, voice-data licensing and speaker-consent hygiene, and the ethics of releasing synthesis or cloning systems.

INTERSPEECH Artifact Evaluation

Interspeech has no badge-granting artifact committee; the artifact culture is community-enforced instead. Reviewers listen to your samples, and post-publication readers judge the paper by whether the recipe reproduces. This skill treats artifacts in the two states an Interspeech cycle forces: anonymous during review, permanent after acceptance. Check the current author instructions for what may be attached versus linked — attachment rules vary by cycle.

The speech-specific artifact set

ArtifactReview-time formPost-acceptance form
Audio samples (TTS/VC/enhancement)Anonymous static demo page or attached filesPermanent samples page linked in camera-ready
Code + training recipeAnonymized repo (no usernames in history/CI)Public repo, tagged at the paper's commit
Model checkpointsUsually withheld (size, identity risk)Hosted release with license and card
Data/corpus contributionDescribed + license stated in paperArchived with DOI, documented splits
Scoring/protocol scriptsIn the anonymized repoIn the public repo — the piece most reused

Anonymous demo pages without leaks

Audio demos are where Interspeech anonymity dies. Before the deadline, sweep:

  • Hosting identity: GitHub Pages under a personal account, university subdomains, and cloud buckets named after the lab all deanonymize. Use a fresh neutral host.
  • Page furniture: analytics IDs, favicon, footer credits, CNAME records.
  • The audio itself: a distinctive proprietary voice can identify the lab as surely as a name — consider whether samples themselves are identifying.
  • File metadata: WAV/MP3 tags, encoder strings, creation paths.
  • Immutability: do not edit the page during review; a changing page suggests post-deadline work and can carry timestamps.

Voice data is personal data

Speech artifacts carry legal and ethical weight that generic ML artifacts do not:

  • Corpus licenses bind derivatives. VoxCeleb-trained speaker models, LDC-derived lexicons, and YouTube-scraped audio each constrain what you may redistribute. State, in the paper, the license of every corpus used.
  • Speaker consent governs sample release: a cloned or converted voice needs the source speaker's permission to be published, even "just for the demo page."
  • Cloning/spoofing dual use: for synthesis and voice-conversion systems, say what you release (recipe? checkpoint? nothing beyond samples?) and why. The community norm — visible in anti-spoofing challenges like ASVspoof — is to weigh release against misuse and to say so explicitly.
  • Do not ship raw audio of human subjects unless its license explicitly allows redistribution; ship feature extraction from the official corpus instead.

Minimum viable recipe

A speech result is reproducible when a stranger can regenerate the number, not just run the model. Package for the number:

text
release/
├── README.md          # env, corpus versions + licenses, one command per table row
├── recipe/            # data prep → training → decoding, in run order
├── conf/              # exact configs/hyperparameters used in the paper
├── scoring/           # the WER/EER/MOS-analysis scripts and text-norm rules
├── RESULTS.md         # expected outputs with tolerances (seeds, CI width)
└── LICENSE            # code license + data-license pointers

The scoring/ directory matters most at this venue: WER moves with text normalization and EER with trial lists, so publish the measurement, not only the model (see interspeech-reproducibility).

Show full SKILL.md (254 more words)Show less

Timing across the cycle

  • Before submission: anonymous demo page frozen; repo anonymized if linked.
  • During review: touch nothing linked from the paper.
  • At camera-ready (19 June in the 2026 cycle): flip links to permanent public homes; tag the repo; add the paper's ISCA Archive DOI to the README.
  • Conference week: QR to samples on the poster; the demo page is your talk's safety net when room audio fails.

Leak patterns seen in the wild

Concrete ways speech artifacts have deanonymized their authors — sweep for each:

  • A demo page hosted at <university>.github.io/<lab-project>/ linked straight from the anonymous PDF.
  • Git history in a "fresh" anonymized repo carrying the original committer emails (git log --format='%ae' | sort -u before sharing).
  • WAV files whose RIFF metadata names the workstation user; MP3 ID3 tags naming the recording engineer.
  • A samples page reusing the lab's distinctive in-house TTS voice from previous published demos — recognizable by ear.
  • Cloud-bucket URLs containing the grant acronym.
  • Analytics or font-loader scripts on the demo page tying it to the lab's other properties.

Checkpoint release decision aid

SituationCommunity-normal release
ASR/SSL encoder on licensed-but-public corporaRecipe + checkpoint
Speaker-verification model on VoxCeleb-family dataRecipe + checkpoint, license noted
TTS/VC on a consenting or synthetic voiceRecipe + checkpoint + samples
TTS/VC cloning a real speaker without release rightsRecipe + samples only; no checkpoint
Anything trained on scraped, unlicensed audioDescribe honestly; release nothing derived

Output format

text
[Artifact inventory] samples / code / checkpoints / data / scoring — state of each
[Anonymity sweep] host, page, metadata, voice-identifiability findings
[License chain] corpus licenses → what may be redistributed
[Consent/dual-use] speaker permission status; release decision + rationale
[Release plan] what flips public at camera-ready, where it lives permanently
[Gaps] <ordered fixes>

Attachment size limits, link policies, and any new artifact requirements are cycle-volatile — verify on the current author pages (2026 sources logged in resources/official-source-map.md, checked 2026-07-08).

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in INTERSPEECH-Skills/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Interspeech Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Artifacts Buildernexu-io/open-design100k—~347Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Mobisys Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Fast Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Artifacts Builder

    nexu-io/open-design

    Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui).

    100k GitHub stars~347 tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mobisys Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fast Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a USENIX FAST artifact for the USENIX Artifact Evaluation scheme (Artifacts Available, Artifacts Functional, Results Reproduced), covering what a storage AEC…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Issta Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ISSTA tool, benchmark, and results for the artifact-evaluation track, covering the ACM badges (Artifacts Available via Zenodo, Evaluated Functional and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Interspeech Artifact Evaluation

What does Interspeech Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready…. Interspeech Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging code, models, and audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review, public release at camera-ready, checkpoint and recipe distribution, voice-data licensing and speaker-consent hygiene, and the ethics of releasing synthesis or cloning systems.

When should I use Interspeech Artifact Evaluation?

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: audio artifacts for an INTERSPEECH paper — anonymous demo pages and sample audio during double-blind review; public release at camera-ready; checkpoint and recipe distribution; voice-data licensing and speaker-consent hygiene.

How do I install Interspeech Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill interspeech-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (INTERSPEECH-Skills/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Interspeech Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill interspeech-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (INTERSPEECH-Skills/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Interspeech Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill interspeech-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/interspeech-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Interspeech Artifact Evaluation need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Interspeech Artifact Evaluation needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git).

Does Interspeech Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Interspeech Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Interspeech Artifact Evaluation use?

Interspeech Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Interspeech Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Interspeech Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Interspeech Artifact Evaluation: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Artifacts Builder (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Mobisys Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Interspeech Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.