Agent skill

Infocom Author Response

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Infocom Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill infocom-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills infocom-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-author-response .claude/skills/infocom-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
infocom-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
533 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how…

  • How to read and act on an early-reject
  • SKILL.md covers The response that counts: a…, Reading an early-reject, After a final reject and If a cycle introduces a…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • What to do after a final reject

What it does

Infocom Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how to read and act on an early-reject, what to do after a final reject, and how to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • How to read and act on an early-reject
  • What to do after a final reject
  • How to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle)

Example prompts

  • “/infocom-author-response”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Infocom Author Response loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 89 tokens; SKILL.md has 533 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~89
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 533 words, ~1,196 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/infocom-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
infocom-author-response
description
Use when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how to read and act on an early-reject, what to do after a final reject, and how to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle).

INFOCOM Author Response

Use this after submission, and — more importantly — before it. The distinctive INFOCOM fact is that there is traditionally no author rebuttal: reviewer scores and TPC discussion decide, and you usually never get a turn to reply. So the "author response" that matters most is the one you bake into the PDF. This skill covers the defensive submission, the early-reject checkpoint, the post-reject move, and any actual response window a cycle introduces (待核实 each year).

The response that counts: a self-defending submission

Because you likely cannot reply, answer the reviewer in the paper:

  • Pre-empt the top objection per subarea. A theory reviewer will question an assumption — state and justify it in the system model. A systems reviewer will call a baseline unfair — tune it and document the budget. A measurement reviewer will doubt generalization — scope the claim.
  • State limits before a reviewer finds them. A short "where this does not hold" paragraph disarms the objection you could not otherwise rebut.
  • Make every number checkable. Named simulator, seeds, confidence intervals, and (optionally) released scripts turn "I don't believe this" into "I can verify this."

This is the opposite of a rebuttal-driven venue, where authors sometimes ship a thin submission planning to "fix it in the response." At INFOCOM that plan fails silently.

Reading an early-reject

INFOCOM's early-reject phase (INFOCOM 2027: 9 Oct 2026) cuts papers before full discussion. Treat it as signal:

text
[Uniform low scores]  the paper did not read as INFOCOM-ready to multiple readers -> structural fix
[Scope mismatch]      routed to the wrong subarea, or genuinely off-scope -> re-tag or reroute
[Compliance]          double-blind or length violation flagged -> mechanical, fixable next cycle
-> there is no appeal; diagnose which of these it was and act, do not relitigate

An early-reject is rarely a near-miss; a paper the reviewers wanted to discuss survives to the full round. Read it as "this needs real work," not "this was unlucky."

After a final reject

  • No rebuttal existed to blame — the decision reflects the paper as written. Extract the named weakness from the reviews and fix that, not the phrasing.
  • Reroute by shape. A built-system reject may fit SIGCOMM/NSDI with a deployment story; an analytical reject may fit ToN/JSAC with the full-length treatment the page limit forbade; a focused protocol result may fit ICNP.
  • Resubmit deliberately. A lightly edited resubmission to the next INFOCOM meets a similar reviewer pool; change something real (a tuned baseline, a proved case, a larger evaluation).
Show full SKILL.md (181 more words)Show less

If a cycle introduces a response window (verify first)

Should a given INFOCOM add an author-feedback/rebuttal period (待核实 — do not assume it), apply the discipline of a scarce turn:

PushbackWhat it signalsResponse move
"The baseline is untuned/unfair"Soundness doubtReport the re-run with an equal, documented budget, or justify the choice
"The assumption is unrealistic"Modeling-validity doubtBound the gap empirically or scope the theorem; do not hand-wave
"Doesn't scale beyond a toy topology"External-validity limitPoint to the largest evaluated size; add one if the format permits
"A proof step is unclear"Rigor doubtGive the missing step concisely; point to the appendix/report

Answer only decision-critical, verifiable points; keep it anonymous; do not add claims the reviewers could not check.

Calibration

  • Confirm whether a rebuttal exists this cycle before promising anyone a reply — the default is none.
  • The PC discussion decides; even where a response window exists, the revised understanding of your existing paper is what moves a score, not new promises.
  • Length and format of any response window vary by cycle; confirm the current instructions.

Output format

text
[Situation] pre-submission (defensive) / early-reject / final reject / response-window (待核实)
[Defensive audit] <top objection per subarea -> pre-empted in the PDF? yes/no>
[Early-reject diagnosis] uniform-low / scope / compliance -> action
[Reroute plan] <SIGCOMM/NSDI | ICNP | ToN/JSAC | resubmit-with-change>
[If response window] <decision-critical, verifiable points only; anonymity check>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Infocom Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Infocom Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Infocom Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~472Automated safety check: PassMIT
Hermes Agent Skill AuthoringNousResearch/hermes-agent252k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Icsme Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Fast Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Icassp Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Responsive Units

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.

    74k GitHub stars~472 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Hermes Agent Skill Authoring

    NousResearch/hermes-agent

    Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.

    252k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Icsme Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting an IEEE ICSME author response during the double-anonymous author-response period, covering the early-decision cut that decides whether you respond at all…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fast Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Icassp Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Itcs Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses to operate under the reality that ITCS has no rebuttal or author-response phase — pre-empting reviewer objections inside the submission, then handling the post-decision…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Infocom Author Response

What does Infocom Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how…. Infocom Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when handling the IEEE INFOCOM post-submission reality — that the venue has traditionally offered no author rebuttal — covering how to write a self-defending submission, how to read and act on an early-reject, what to do after a final reject, and how to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle).

When should I use Infocom Author Response?

Infocom Author Response fits situations like: how to read and act on an early-reject; what to do after a final reject; how to use any response window a given cycle does introduce (verify per cycle).

How do I install Infocom Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill infocom-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/infocom-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Infocom Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill infocom-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/infocom-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Infocom Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill infocom-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/infocom-author-response, .gemini/skills/infocom-author-response, .github/skills/infocom-author-response and .opencode/skills/infocom-author-response in your project.

What does Infocom Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Infocom Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Infocom Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Infocom Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Infocom Author Response use?

Infocom Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Infocom Author Response use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Infocom Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Infocom Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Hermes Agent Skill Authoring (NousResearch/hermes-agent, 252k stars), Icsme Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Fast Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Infocom Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.