Agent skill

Imc Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release, covering the artifact-availability declaration, post-acceptance availability shepherding, DOI-issuing dataset archives…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Imc Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imc-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills imc-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/IMC-Skills/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
imc-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
527 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release, covering the artifact-availability declaration, post-acceptance availability shepherding, DOI-issuing dataset archives…

  • Preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release
  • SKILL.md covers Two artifacts, two audiences, The availability declaration,…, What a strong measurement… and Reproducibility for a moving…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering the artifact-availability declaration

What it does

Imc Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release, covering the artifact-availability declaration, post-acceptance availability shepherding, DOI-issuing dataset archives, documenting measurement provenance and vantage points, Community Contribution Award eligibility, and the difference between the anonymized review artifact and the public release.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release
  • Covering the artifact-availability declaration
  • Post-acceptance availability shepherding
  • DOI-issuing dataset archives

Example prompts

  • “/imc-artifact-evaluation”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Imc Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 94 tokens; SKILL.md has 527 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~94
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 527 words, ~1,344 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
imc-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release, covering the artifact-availability declaration, post-acceptance availability shepherding, DOI-issuing dataset archives, documenting measurement provenance and vantage points, Community Contribution Award eligibility, and the difference between the anonymized review artifact and the public release.

IMC Artifact Evaluation

Use this for IMC's artifact and dataset story. Unlike venues with a separate badge-granting committee, IMC's mechanism is centered on an availability declaration at submission plus shepherding after acceptance to ensure the promised data, code, or platform actually becomes available. The venue-defining incentive is the Community Contribution Award, which exists to honor a released dataset, tool, or open platform. Whether IMC also awards formal ACM reproducibility badges in a given edition is 待核实 — confirm on the current call.

Two artifacts, two audiences

  • Review artifact (at submission): anonymized for the reviewers — no owner strings, testbed or AS identifiers, probe-account IDs, cluster paths, or lab-domain links. It backs the paper's claims during double-blind review.
  • Public release (after acceptance): de-anonymized, licensed, permanently archived. This is what the shepherd checks, what the camera-ready cites, and what the Community Contribution Award evaluates.

The availability declaration, delivered

At submission you declared full / partial / none. After acceptance, the shepherd holds you to it:

DeclaredWhat the shepherd expectsCommon failure caught
FullThe dataset/tool/platform, publicly retrievable and documentedLink promised, never published; broken archive
PartialThe shareable subset + a stated reason for the rest"Partial" used to avoid work; unclear what is shared
NoneA specific, legitimate justification (proprietary/privacy/legal)Vague "on request"; no reason given

"Available on request" is not availability. If law or privacy blocks release, say precisely why and, where possible, release a derived/aggregated safe version.

What a strong measurement dataset release contains

text
[Data]        the measured dataset itself (or a documented, privacy-safe derivative)
[Schema]      a documented schema/dictionary: every field, unit, and its meaning
[Provenance]  vantage points (locations, ASes, probe types), measurement dates and durations,
              target lists with capture dates, tool versions, sampling and rate limits
[Method]      the collection scripts/tooling and how to re-run the *method* (data will differ)
[Ethics]      the privacy/anonymization applied to the release; disclosure status
[License]     an explicit open license (e.g., CC-BY for data, OSI license for code)
[Archive]     a DOI-issuing repository (Zenodo, figshare, Software Heritage) or a durable
              community archive — not a personal homepage

Reproducibility for a moving Internet

Measurement data cannot be re-collected identically — the Internet changes. So the release must make the captured data and its provenance the reproducible core, and the method re-runnable to produce new comparable data. Ship the analysis scripts that turn the released data into the paper's figures; a number in the PDF that no script regenerates from the released data is the contradiction a shepherd (and a reader) will flag.

Show full SKILL.md (213 more words)Show less

Community Contribution Award eligibility

The award recognizes an outstanding dataset, source-code distribution, open platform, or service to the community. To be eligible, the data/code/tool must be publicly available and usable by the time of the camera-ready deadline — not "coming soon." Aim for it by making the release:

  • Usable by a stranger: documented schema, a README, and a runnable example.
  • Durable: a DOI and a maintenance/versioning note.
  • Reusable: an open license and, for platforms, an access path others can actually use.

Worked vignette: releasing a longitudinal scan dataset

A paper contributes a two-year scan of a protocol's deployment. For a strong, award-eligible release: publish the per-scan records with a documented schema; include vantage-point and timing metadata for every scan; apply and document IP/host anonymization consistent with the Ethics section; ship the analysis notebooks that regenerate each figure from the released data; deposit in a DOI-issuing archive with a CC-BY license; and state honestly which raw captures cannot be shared for privacy reasons and what safe derivative replaces them.

Calibration

  • Availability is judged at camera-ready time for the award and during shepherding for the accepted paper — plan the release before, not after, acceptance.
  • Whether formal ACM badges are offered, and the exact shepherding process, vary by edition — confirm on the current call (待核实).

Output format

text
[Artifact role] anonymized review artifact / public release
[Declaration] full / partial / none (+ justification)
[Contents] <data/schema/provenance/method/ethics/license/archive>
[Reproducibility] scripts regenerate figures from released data? yes/no
[Award eligibility] public + usable by camera-ready? yes/no
[Fixes before release] <ordered list>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in IMC-Skills/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Imc Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Imc Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Imc Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Artifacts Buildernexu-io/open-design100k—~347Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Ase Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sigcomm Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Artifacts Builder

    nexu-io/open-design

    Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui).

    100k GitHub stars~347 tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ase Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when preparing an accepted ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper's tool and data for the Artifact Evaluation track, targeting the ACM Artifacts Available and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SIGCOMM paper's code, traces, topologies, and configuration for the artifact-evaluation committee — choosing ACM badges (Artifacts Available, Evaluated…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Isca Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when preparing an accepted ISCA paper's artifact for evaluation under the ACM Review and Badging policy — scoping which results are reproducible within evaluator budgets…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Imc Artifact Evaluation

What does Imc Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release, covering the artifact-availability declaration, post-acceptance availability shepherding, DOI-issuing dataset archives…. Imc Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release, covering the artifact-availability declaration, post-acceptance availability shepherding, DOI-issuing dataset archives, documenting measurement provenance and vantage points, Community Contribution Award eligibility, and the difference between the anonymized review artifact and the public release.

When should I use Imc Artifact Evaluation?

Imc Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: preparing an ACM IMC artifact for release; covering the artifact-availability declaration; post-acceptance availability shepherding; DOI-issuing dataset archives.

How do I install Imc Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imc-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (IMC-Skills/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Imc Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imc-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (IMC-Skills/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Imc Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imc-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/imc-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Imc Artifact Evaluation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Imc Artifact Evaluation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Imc Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Imc Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Imc Artifact Evaluation use?

Imc Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Imc Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Imc Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Imc Artifact Evaluation: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Artifacts Builder (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Ase Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Imc Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.