Modeling Competition Computation Stage
WuXinbo-bo/Math-model-skills
Pipeline stage that turns a mathematical modeling report into runnable programs per sub-question, frozen numerical results and reviewable evidence files.
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a…
Install Ijoc Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ijoc-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal .claude/skills/ijoc-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ijoc-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal into .claude/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ijoc-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ijoc-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal .agents/skills/ijoc-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ijoc-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal into .agents/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ijoc-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ijoc-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal .cursor/skills/ijoc-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ijoc-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ijoc-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ijoc-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal .gemini/skills/ijoc-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ijoc-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ijoc-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ijoc-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal .github/skills/ijoc-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ijoc-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal into .github/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ijoc-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ijoc-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal .opencode/skills/ijoc-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ijoc-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ijoc-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ijoc-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 601 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a…
- Works in 4 steps: Open with the changes that matter. A… → Point-by-point, quoting each comment.… → Show the evidence inline. For… → …
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The IJOC rebuttal mindset, Structure of the response and Mapping common IJOC objections…, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Ijoc Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a point-by-point response with re-run evidence. Builds the rebuttal and revision plan; it does not run new analysis on its own (route to ijoc-data-analysis).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review, Reproducible research and Data analysis. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- Tasks that involve Reproducible research
- Tasks that involve Data analysis
Example prompts
- “/ijoc-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Open with the changes that matter. A short summary: the main new experiments, the strengthened baselines, the reproducibility fixes — so…
- Point-by-point, quoting each comment. Reproduce each referee point verbatim, then respond. Use a consistent tag: [Done — with evidence]…
- Show the evidence inline. For computational objections, include the new table/profile or its key number and a pointer to where it now…
- Be honest about limits. Where a competitor still wins a regime, say so and scope the claim rather than overclaiming — IJOC referees reward…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ijoc Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 601 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 601 words, ~1,337 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ijoc-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ijoc-rebuttal
- description
- Use when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a point-by-point response with re-run evidence. Builds the rebuttal and revision plan; it does not run new analysis on its own (route to ijoc-data-analysis).
Rebuttal Strategy (ijoc-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- An IJOC major/minor revision arrived and you need a response-letter strategy
- Referees challenge the fairness, scale, or reproducibility of the computational experiments
- You disagree with a referee on a method point and must push back without alienating the associate editor
- You need to convert a long, mixed decision letter into an ordered, checkable revision plan
The IJOC rebuttal mindset
IJOC revisions are won with evidence, not rhetoric. Most consequential objections are computational ("the comparison is unfair," "instances too small," "cannot reproduce"), and the strongest response is a re-run that settles the question: more standard instances, a stronger baseline, more seeds, a performance profile, an updated deposit. Because the associate editor is undisclosed and single-blind, write to the substance of each report for a technical reader; never speculate about who wrote what. The AE is reading for whether you took the experiments seriously.
Structure of the response
- Open with the changes that matter. A short summary: the main new experiments, the strengthened baselines, the reproducibility fixes — so the AE sees the substantive work first.
- Point-by-point, quoting each comment. Reproduce each referee point verbatim, then respond. Use a consistent tag: [Done — with evidence], [Done — text], [Respectfully disagree — with reason].
- Show the evidence inline. For computational objections, include the new table/profile or its key number and a pointer to where it now lives in the paper and the deposit. "We re-ran on the full MIPLIB-class set; the performance profile (new Fig. 5) shows we dominate beyond τ=1.4; updated in
results/(illustrative)." - Be honest about limits. Where a competitor still wins a regime, say so and scope the claim rather than overclaiming — IJOC referees reward calibrated honesty.
Mapping common IJOC objections to the response
| Objection | Winning response | Owning skill |
|---|---|---|
| "baseline is weak / outdated" | re-run vs. current solver/SOTA, symmetric tuning; show the new comparison | ijoc-data-analysis |
| "instances cherry-picked / too small" | full standard set + scaling plot; report losses too | ijoc-data-analysis |
| "results not statistically supported" | add Wilcoxon + performance profile; multiple-seed dispersion | ijoc-data-analysis |
| "no guarantee / correctness unclear" | add validity/complexity proof; reconcile theory with plots | ijoc-theory-development |
| "cannot reproduce your numbers" | fix and re-tag the deposit; align results/ to tables; confirm it runs clean | ijoc-data-analysis |
| "contribution incremental" | sharpen claim + positioning vs. recent work | ijoc-contribution-framing / ijoc-literature-positioning |
| "out of scope" | re-argue computing-first fit, or reconsider venue | ijoc-topic-selection |
Show full SKILL.md (217 more words)Show less
Disagreeing well
You may push back, but with a reason a technical reviewer accepts: a misread of the method, a baseline that is not actually comparable, a request outside the paper's scope. Concede the framing ("the reviewer is right that X would strengthen the paper") even while declining ("but it changes the research question; we instead add Y, which addresses the underlying concern"). Flat refusal with no alternative is what loses AEs.
Checklist
- Response opens with the substantive new experiments and reproducibility fixes
- Every referee point quoted and answered with a clear status tag
- Computational objections answered with re-run evidence, not prose
- New/updated exhibits pointed to in both the paper and the deposit
- The deposit re-tagged and confirmed to reproduce the revised results
- Disagreements carry a technical reason and an alternative
- Claims rescoped honestly where a competitor still wins
- Tone is professional; no speculation about the undisclosed AE/referees
Anti-patterns
- Answering an experimental objection with words instead of a re-run
- Marking points "Done" without changing the paper or the deposit
- Updating the manuscript but leaving the GitHub deposit stale (a "cannot reproduce" relapse)
- Flat refusal of a reviewer request with no reason or alternative
- Overclaiming after revision instead of scoping to the regimes you actually win
- Guessing the AE's or reviewer's identity and writing to it
Output format
【Journal】INFORMS Journal on Computing
【Skill】ijoc-rebuttal
【Summary of changes】new experiments / baselines / reproducibility fixes
【Point-by-point】each comment quoted + status tag + evidence pointer
【Re-run evidence】profiles/tests/seeds added where challenged
【Deposit】re-tagged and reproduces revised results? [Y/N]
【Honest scoping】claims rescoped where a rival wins
【Next step】resubmit via ScholarOne → ijoc-review-process to track the new round© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ijoc Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ijoc Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Modeling Competition Computation StageWuXinbo-bo/Math-model-skills | 111 | — | ~4.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Mathmodel SkillhandsomeZR-netizen/mathmodel-skill | 292 | — | ~197 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Ma Peer Reviewhtlin222/meta-pipe | 139 | — | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Icml Reviewersundial-org/skills | 153 | — | ~2.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | None |
Similar skills
Mathmodel Skill
handsomeZR-netizen/mathmodel-skill
Plugin shim for the mathmodel-skill competition workflow. An agent skill from handsomeZR-netizen/mathmodel-skill.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Ma Peer Review
htlin222/meta-pipe
Act as Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2 for a meta-analysis manuscript, checking rigor, reproducibility, and reporting compliance.
Icml Reviewer
sundial-org/skills
Paper reviewer that evaluates machine learning research projects following official ICML reviewer guidelines.
Review Paper
pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees +…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Ijoc Rebuttal
What does Ijoc Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a…. Ijoc Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a point-by-point response with re-run evidence.
When should I use Ijoc Rebuttal?
Ijoc Rebuttal fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review; tasks that involve Reproducible research; tasks that involve Data analysis.
How do I install Ijoc Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ijoc-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ijoc Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ijoc-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ijoc Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijoc-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ijoc-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/ijoc-rebuttal, .github/skills/ijoc-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/ijoc-rebuttal in your project.
What does Ijoc Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ijoc Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ijoc Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ijoc Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ijoc Rebuttal use?
Ijoc Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ijoc Rebuttal use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ijoc Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ijoc Rebuttal: Modeling Competition Computation Stage (WuXinbo-bo/Math-model-skills, 111 stars), Mathmodel Skill (handsomeZR-netizen/mathmodel-skill, 292 stars), Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars) and Ma Peer Review (htlin222/meta-pipe, 139 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ijoc Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.