Forensify
alexgreensh/repo-forensics
Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. An agent skill from alexgreensh/repo-forensics.
A skill your agent uses when drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers or the response plan for a Revise decision, including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window…
Install Ieeesp Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response .claude/skills/ieeesp-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response into .claude/skills/ieeesp-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response .agents/skills/ieeesp-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response into .agents/skills/ieeesp-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response .cursor/skills/ieeesp-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response into .cursor/skills/ieeesp-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response .gemini/skills/ieeesp-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response into .gemini/skills/ieeesp-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response .github/skills/ieeesp-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response into .github/skills/ieeesp-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response .opencode/skills/ieeesp-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response into .opencode/skills/ieeesp-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ieeesp-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 533 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers or the response plan for a Revise decision, including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window…
- Works in 5 steps: Extract each expectation into a numbered… → Deliver every item or explicitly… → Write a change document mapping… → …
- Drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers
- SKILL.md covers Pre-draft before reviews land, Triage the review set in the…, Rules of engagement in the… and Rebuttal skeleton, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Ieeesp Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers or the response plan for a Revise decision, including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window, answering adaptive-attack and threat-model objections, handling ethics questions with documentation, and writing against the Revise expectations summary.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Security, covering Threat modeling. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers
- The response plan for a Revise decision
- Including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window
- Answering adaptive-attack and threat-model objections
Example prompts
- “/ieeesp-author-response”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Extract each expectation into a numbered ledger; get co-author agreement
- Deliver every item or explicitly negotiate the ones you contest — silence
- Write a change document mapping expectation → change → location, so the
- Do not add major unrequested material; new claims reopen review scope.
- Confirm on the live cycle pages which cycle receives the revision and its
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ieeesp Author Response loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 533 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 533 words, ~1,279 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ieeesp-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ieeesp-author-response
- description
- Use when drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers or the response plan for a Revise decision, including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window, answering adaptive-attack and threat-model objections, handling ethics questions with documentation, and writing against the Revise expectations summary.
IEEE S&P Author Response
Use this in two situations that S&P runs differently from most venues: the short rebuttal offered only to papers that survive the first round, and the Revise response, a full re-submission against a written expectations summary. The 2027 Cycle 2 rebuttal window was five days — reviews out Feb 11, rebuttal due Feb 16, 2027 (checked 2026-07-08) — so the work is mostly done before reviews arrive or it does not get done.
Pre-draft before reviews land
Between the early-reject notice and review release, write the skeleton:
- The three objections your own red-team read would raise (usually: an adaptive-attacker gap, a threat-model realism question, a measurement-validity question).
- The exact section/figure references answering each.
- The ethics documentation block: disclosure dates, vendor responses, IRB determination ID — assembled, dated, ready to paste.
Triage the review set in the first hour
| Objection type | Response strategy | Win probability |
|---|---|---|
| Misreading of mechanism or threat model | Quote the submission, cite section, restate in two lines | High |
| Missing experiment you actually have | Point to appendix/artifact location | High |
| Adaptive-attack gap that is real | Concede scope precisely; state what the evaluated adversary covers | Medium — honesty is scored |
| Threat-model taste ("attacker unrealistic") | Ground in incidents/measurements, not adjectives | Medium |
| Ethics record question | Dates, IDs, named approvals — documentation only | Binary: docs exist or not |
| Fundamental novelty dispute | One paragraph on the delta; do not relitigate | Low — spend words elsewhere |
Spend the budget in proportion to win probability times decision weight, and answer every reviewer at least once — an ignored reviewer in the post-rebuttal discussion is a vote you conceded.
Rules of engagement in the rebuttal
- Answer the objection actually written, not the friendlier one nearby.
- New experimental results: follow the current cycle's instructions on whether new numbers are allowed (待核实 each cycle); when unclear, phrase as verification of existing claims rather than new contributions.
- Never argue that a security concern "is out of scope" without saying whose scope — restate the threat model's boundary and why it is the right one.
- Keep the anonymous voice; disclosure specifics stay venue-neutral.
- No links out of HotCRP unless the CFP explicitly permits them.
Show full SKILL.md (185 more words)Show less
Rebuttal skeleton
Common response (all reviewers):
C1. Threat model boundary: <2 lines + §ref>
C2. Adaptive-adversary coverage: <what was evaluated, §ref>
C3. Ethics record: disclosed <date>, IRB <id/waiver>, data handling <§ref>
Reviewer A:
A1 [misreading] The attack does not require <X>; see §3.2 ¶2.
A2 [evidence] The <n>-target evaluation is in Table 4; per-target
breakdown in Appendix C.
Reviewer B:
B1 [concession] Correct: we do not evaluate <adversary class>. Our claims
are scoped to <boundary> (§2); extending is future work.
→ ≤ <current cycle's length cap 待核实>; every point ends at a §/Table/date.Responding to a Revise decision
The Revise summary of expectations is a contract, not a suggestion list:
- Extract each expectation into a numbered ledger; get co-author agreement on the interpretation of each before doing work.
- Deliver every item or explicitly negotiate the ones you contest — silence on an expectation reads as failure to meet it.
- Write a change document mapping expectation → change → location, so the returning reviewers can verify in minutes.
- Do not add major unrequested material; new claims reopen review scope.
- Confirm on the live cycle pages which cycle receives the revision and its deadline (待核实 — the 2027 mechanics were not published at check time).
Failure modes seen at this venue
- Spending the five days on the novelty dispute instead of the fixable evidence objections.
- Answering an ethics question with philosophy instead of a timeline.
- Treating Revise as "minor revisions plus a cover letter" — it is re-reviewed as a major revision against the written expectations.
- Missing that the rebuttal's real audience is the reviewer discussion that follows it: write lines a sympathetic reviewer can quote.
Output format
[Mode] rebuttal (5-day) / revise response
[Ledger] <n> objections: misreading <n> · evidence <n> · taste <n> · ethics <n>
[Concessions] <what is honestly out of evaluated scope>
[Documentation block] disclosure dates ✓/✗ · IRB id ✓/✗ · artifact refs ✓/✗
[Word budget plan] <allocation across reviewers>
[Open 待核实] new-results policy / length cap / revise target cycle© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ieeesp Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ieeesp Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Forensifyalexgreensh/repo-forensics | 190 | — | ~2.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | Custom licence | |
| Create Rulecartography-cncf/cartography | 4.1k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Commit Security Scancodexstar69/bug-hunter | 520 | — | ~629 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Auditing Code For Vulnerabilitiestrilwu/secskills | 157 | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Threat Mitigation Mappingwshobson/agents | 40k | 8 repos | ~742 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Create Rule
cartography-cncf/cartography
Author a Cartography security rule (one or more Cypher Facts plus a Pydantic Finding output model) under cartography/rules/data/rules/.
Commit Security Scan
codexstar69/bug-hunter
Scan code changes for security vulnerabilities using Bug Hunter-native artifacts and STRIDE context.
Auditing Code For Vulnerabilities
trilwu/secskills
Audit source code for exploitable vulnerabilities using threat-model-driven review, taint tracing, invariant checking, and variant analysis.
Threat Mitigation Mapping
wshobson/agents
Match identified threats to preventive, detective and corrective controls across network, application, data, endpoint and process layers to plan remediation.
Audit Browser Security Boundaries
nordstjernen-web/northstar-browser
Audit browser-engine changes that process untrusted content or cross native-memory, origin, network, storage, extension, decoder, sandbox, or operating-system boundaries.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Ieeesp Author Response
What does Ieeesp Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers or the response plan for a Revise decision, including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window…. Ieeesp Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers or the response plan for a Revise decision, including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window, answering adaptive-attack and threat-model objections, handling ethics questions with documentation, and writing against the Revise expectations summary.
When should I use Ieeesp Author Response?
Ieeesp Author Response fits situations like: drafting the IEEE S&P (Oakland) rebuttal for second-round papers; the response plan for a Revise decision; including triaging reviews under the ~5-day window; answering adaptive-attack and threat-model objections.
How do I install Ieeesp Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ieeesp-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ieeesp Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ieeesp-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ieeesp Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ieeesp-author-response, .gemini/skills/ieeesp-author-response, .github/skills/ieeesp-author-response and .opencode/skills/ieeesp-author-response in your project.
What does Ieeesp Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ieeesp Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ieeesp Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ieeesp Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ieeesp Author Response use?
Ieeesp Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ieeesp Author Response use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ieeesp Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ieeesp Author Response: Forensify (alexgreensh/repo-forensics, 190 stars), Create Rule (cartography-cncf/cartography, 4.1k stars), Commit Security Scan (codexstar69/bug-hunter, 520 stars) and Auditing Code For Vulnerabilities (trilwu/secskills, 157 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ieeesp Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.