A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICSE author response or executing a Major Revision, covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews, the September response window, the…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Icse Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icse-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icse-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICSE-Skills/skills/icse-author-response .claude/skills/icse-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
icse-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
718 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICSE author response or executing a Major Revision, covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews, the September response window, the…

  • Works in 3 steps: Correct factual misreadings, with a… → Supply requested evidence that already… → Commit to feasible changes, scoped to…
  • Drafting an ICSE author response
  • SKILL.md covers Turn 1: the author response, Turn 2: the Major Revision, Revision-sprint triage and Tone calibration, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Icse Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ICSE author response or executing a Major Revision, covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews, the September response window, the four-week revision sprint to the November deadline, response-letter structure, and change tracking that survives PC re-review.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting an ICSE author response
  • Executing a Major Revision
  • Covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews
  • The September response window

Example prompts

  • “/icse-author-response”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Correct factual misreadings, with a page/section pointer: "R2 states we
  2. Supply requested evidence that already exists — a number, a table cell,
  3. Commit to feasible changes, scoped to what a Major Revision window can

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Icse Author Response loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 718 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~80
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 718 words, ~1,553 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/icse-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
icse-author-response
description
Use when drafting an ICSE author response or executing a Major Revision, covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews, the September response window, the four-week revision sprint to the November deadline, response-letter structure, and change tracking that survives PC re-review.

ICSE Author Response

ICSE gives authors two distinct speaking turns, and they demand different documents. The author response (September in the 2027 cycle, checked 2026-07-08) answers reviews before first decisions; the Major Revision response letter (revision due November 17, 2026; final decision December 18) accompanies a changed paper re-read by the same reviewers. Do not write the first as if it were the second.

Turn 1: the author response

You are writing for the PC discussion, not for your own catharsis. Three moves earn their space:

  1. Correct factual misreadings, with a page/section pointer: "R2 states we evaluate on toy programs; §5.1 lists the 17 real-world projects (median 210 kLOC)."
  2. Supply requested evidence that already exists — a number, a table cell, a clarification of the study protocol. If it fits in a sentence, give the sentence, not a promise.
  3. Commit to feasible changes, scoped to what a Major Revision window can hold. "We will add effect sizes to Table 4" is credible; "we will run a controlled experiment with professional developers" is not.

Map every reply to the criterion it defends. ICSE reviews are structured around novelty, rigor, relevance, and verifiability/transparency — a response that answers a rigor objection with a relevance argument reads as evasion.

Objection patternCriterion under attackResponse that works
"Delta over [X] unclear"NoveltyOne-paragraph contrast: what X cannot do, with citation and evidence pointer
"Only N subjects / projects"RigorJustify N against comparable published studies; show per-subject variance
"Why would practitioners care?"RelevanceConcrete failure cost, practitioner quote, or deployment context from the paper
"Cannot tell how the tool works"VerifiabilityPoint to artifact + name the exact section/README that answers it
"Threats section is boilerplate"RigorName the one threat that genuinely worries you and the mitigation you ran

Response mechanics for the current cycle (length cap, structured forms, whether revised PDFs are allowed) were not published at check time — 待核实 on the HotCRP site when the window opens. Draft to fit the tightest historical norm: short, numbered, no new-contribution smuggling.

Turn 2: the Major Revision

A Major Revision at ICSE is an itemized contract. The meta-review or reviews enumerate required changes; December's decision largely reduces to whether each item is verifiably addressed. The four-week window (Oct 20 notification → Nov 17 revision in 2027) sets the feasibility bar for what you promise.

Structure the response letter as a ledger:

markdown
# Response to Reviews — Submission #NNN (Major Revision)

## Summary of changes
Three sentences: the big moves, in reviewer language.

## R1.1 (rigor) — "No baseline against static analysis tools."
**Change:** Added SpotBugs and Infer as baselines; new §5.3, Table 6.
**Where:** pp. 6–7, marked in blue.

## R1.2 (verifiability) — "Prompt templates not disclosed."
**Change:** Full templates now in the replication package (`prompts/`),
summarized in §4.2.

## R3.4 — "Compare on industrial code."
**Declined, with reason:** licensing prevents redistribution; we instead added
two large OSS systems (§5.1) and state the limit in Threats (§7).

Rules of the ledger: every numbered reviewer point appears, including the ones you decline; every change names its section and page; declined items get a reason, never silence. Submit a diff-marked PDF if the instructions allow one — reviewers granted four weeks of their own time deserve not to hunt.

Show full SKILL.md (273 more words)Show less

Revision-sprint triage

With four weeks, order work by decision impact per day:

  1. Days 1–3: parse all reviews into the ledger; agree the decline list with coauthors; email the chairs only if a required change is genuinely ambiguous.
  2. Week 1–2: the evidence items — new baselines, added analyses, statistics. These have the longest compute/writing tails.
  3. Week 3: framing items — intro repositioning, related-work additions, threats rewrite.
  4. Final days: ledger completion pass, diff-PDF build, artifact update so the package matches the revised claims.

Tone calibration

The register that works is technical-neutral: no wounded pride, no flattery, no lawyering. Compare:

  • Defensive: "The reviewer apparently did not read §5, where this is clearly explained." → Working: "§5.2 (Table 4, row 3) reports this; we will make the forward reference in §3 explicit."
  • Over-conceding: "We agree our evaluation is limited and will try to improve." → Working: "We agree external validity is bounded by the Java focus; we now state this in §7 and add two non-JVM subjects to the package's extension guide."

Concede real weaknesses precisely (it buys credibility for the pushbacks); push back on real errors respectfully (silence reads as agreement).

Anti-patterns

  • The grateful essay. Paragraphs of thanks before content; reviewers read ledgers, not letters of appreciation.
  • The stealth rewrite. Changing sections nobody complained about invites fresh objections in December with no turn left to answer them.
  • The optimistic promise in Turn 1 that Turn 2 cannot keep — reviewers keep receipts across turns; an unkept response commitment is a rejection reason all by itself.
  • Artifact drift: revised claims with an unrevised replication package fails exactly the verifiability criterion the revision was meant to satisfy.

Output format

text
[Turn] author response / major revision
[Ledger] N reviewer points -> addressed / declined-with-reason / needs decision
[Feasibility] promised work vs days remaining to Nov 17
[Risk items] points where the December decision could still go against you

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ICSE-Skills/skills/icse-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Icse Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Icse Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Icse Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Executing Nist Rmf Authorization To Operatemukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~472Automated safety check: PassMIT
Executealirezarezvani/claude-skills28k—~831Automated safety check: PassMIT
Debugging Executionsn8n-io/n8n207k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Hermes Agent Skill AuthoringNousResearch/hermes-agent252k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Executing Nist Rmf Authorization To Operate

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Drive a federal system through the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37 Rev 2) to an Authorization to Operate (ATO): Prepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select a control baseline (FIPS 200 / SP…

    34k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Backend & APIsAuto-check passed
  • Responsive Units

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.

    74k GitHub stars~472 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Execute

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    /cs:execute <decision — Generate a 90-day execution plan with weekly milestones, DRIs, and check-in cadence from an approved decision.

    28k GitHub stars~831 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Debug failed or wrong-output workflow executions using executions tools.

    207k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Hermes Agent Skill Authoring

    NousResearch/hermes-agent

    Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.

    252k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Conext Author Response

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting ACM CoNEXT author responses, covering the initial-review rebuttal and — distinctively — the one-shot "major" revision response letter that must stay…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Icse Author Response

What does Icse Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICSE author response or executing a Major Revision, covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews, the September response window, the…. Icse Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting an ICSE author response or executing a Major Revision, covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews, the September response window, the four-week revision sprint to the November deadline, response-letter structure, and change tracking that survives PC re-review.

When should I use Icse Author Response?

Icse Author Response fits situations like: drafting an ICSE author response; executing a Major Revision; covering criterion-targeted replies to research-track reviews; the September response window.

How do I install Icse Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icse-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICSE-Skills/skills/icse-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/icse-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Icse Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icse-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICSE-Skills/skills/icse-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/icse-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Icse Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icse-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/icse-author-response, .gemini/skills/icse-author-response, .github/skills/icse-author-response and .opencode/skills/icse-author-response in your project.

What does Icse Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Icse Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Icse Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Icse Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Icse Author Response use?

Icse Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Icse Author Response use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Icse Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Icse Author Response: Executing Nist Rmf Authorization To Operate (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars), Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Execute (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars) and Debugging Executions (n8n-io/n8n, 207k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Icse Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.