Get Job
agentenatalie/get-job.skill
实习.skill / get-job.skill：从岗位调研、简历改写到分轮次面试准备的全流程求职 skill。适合找工作、投实习、校招、秋招、春招、暑期实习、社招、跳槽、转行、跨专业求职、留学生求职，以及产品经理、运营、市场、咨询、AI 产品、AI Coding、数据分析、技术岗等目标岗位准备。
A skill your agent uses when explaining or strategizing around ICRA's review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors, reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza…
Install Icra Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icra-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process .claude/skills/icra-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "icra-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process into .claude/skills/icra-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "icra-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icra-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process .agents/skills/icra-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "icra-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process into .agents/skills/icra-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "icra-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icra-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process .cursor/skills/icra-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "icra-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process into .cursor/skills/icra-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "icra-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icra-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process .gemini/skills/icra-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "icra-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process into .gemini/skills/icra-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "icra-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icra-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process .github/skills/icra-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "icra-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process into .github/skills/icra-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "icra-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icra-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process .opencode/skills/icra-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "icra-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process into .opencode/skills/icra-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "icra-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
icra-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 670 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when explaining or strategizing around ICRA's review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors, reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza…
- Works in 4 steps: Keyword selection — the only routing… → The video — the one channel that reaches… → Ambiguity elimination — every sentence a… → …
- Strategizing around ICRAs review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors
- SKILL.md covers The pipeline, No rebuttal: consequences, not…, What the review form rewards and Where author leverage actually…, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Icra Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining or strategizing around ICRA's review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors, reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza, the absence of an author rebuttal in the classic ICRA flow, the January accept/reject decision, and how this differs from RA-L's revise-capable journal review.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Recruiting and HR. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Strategizing around ICRAs review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors
- Reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza
- The absence of an author rebuttal in the classic ICRA flow
- The January accept/reject decision
Example prompts
- “/icra-review-process”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Keyword selection — the only routing input you control; choose for the
- The video — the one channel that reaches reviewers with evidence after
- Ambiguity elimination — every sentence a reviewer could misparse is a
- The limitations paragraph — converts predicted objections from "flaw
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Icra Review Process loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 89 tokens; SKILL.md has 670 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 670 words, ~1,601 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/icra-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- icra-review-process
- description
- Use when explaining or strategizing around ICRA's review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors, reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza, the absence of an author rebuttal in the classic ICRA flow, the January accept/reject decision, and how this differs from RA-L's revise-capable journal review.
ICRA Review Process
ICRA review is run not by ad-hoc program committees but by a standing RAS Conference Editorial Board (CEB) structure operating inside PaperPlaza. The mechanics differ enough from both journals and ML conferences that authors mis-model them — most consequentially around the rebuttal that never comes.
The pipeline
Sep 15 PaperPlaza deadline
│
▼ Editor (area lead) assigns paper to an Associate Editor (AE)
│ by keyword match from your chosen PaperPlaza topics
▼
Oct-Dec AE recruits 2-3 reviewers; reviews written on the standard
│ RAS form (contribution, technical soundness, clarity,
│ experimental validation, video comments)
▼
Dec-Jan AE writes a summary report reconciling the reviews and
│ recommends; Editors + program committee calibrate across areas
▼
Jan 31 accept or reject — no conditional accepts, no shepherding,
│ and in the classic ICRA flow NO author rebuttal phase
▼
Mar camera-ready with voluntary reviewer-driven revisionsTwo structural notes. First, keyword choice at submission is not paperwork — it routes the manuscript to an Editor's area and thereby to the reviewer pool most or least sympathetic to it. Second, reviewer identity practice: reviewers are anonymous to authors, and from the 2026 cycle authors are anonymous to reviewers too (double-anonymous; before 2025 inclusive, single-blind). Policies are set per cycle — confirm on the current year-site.
No rebuttal: consequences, not complaints
The classic ICRA pipeline gives authors no reply channel between submission and decision (individual cycles have experimented; verify the current one). Plan for it:
- The paper must anticipate objections in advance — the limitations
paragraph and pre-answered comparisons (
icra-writing-style) do the job a rebuttal does elsewhere. - Misunderstandings are terminal. If a reviewer misreads the method, no one corrects them before the AE summarizes. Ambiguity is therefore a first-order risk, worth spending page budget to eliminate.
- The video is your asynchronous rebuttal. It answers "is this real / is it
cherry-picked / how fast" before those objections are typed
(
icra-supplementary). - Reviews arrive with the decision, and for accepted papers they function as
camera-ready guidance (
icra-author-responsecovers using them well).
What the review form rewards
| Form dimension | What strong looks like at ICRA |
|---|---|
| Technical soundness | assumptions stated; math checkable; no hidden human-in-the-loop |
| Experimental validation | evidence rung matches claims; trials, dispersion, failure analysis |
| Novelty/contribution | mechanism-level delta over named prior systems |
| Clarity | figure chain self-sufficient; task-first narrative |
| Multimedia | uncut executions, labeled speeds, failure shown |
Borderline papers typically die on validation ("promising but insufficient experimental support") rather than novelty — allocate effort accordingly.
Where author leverage actually exists
With no rebuttal, influence concentrates before upload:
- Keyword selection — the only routing input you control; choose for the reviewer pool you want, within honesty.
- The video — the one channel that reaches reviewers with evidence after the PDF freezes their reading order but before they form judgments.
- Ambiguity elimination — every sentence a reviewer could misparse is a decision risk with no correction mechanism.
- The limitations paragraph — converts predicted objections from "flaw found" to "flaw acknowledged," a materially different review sentence.
Show full SKILL.md (278 more words)Show less
Calibrating expectations
- ICRA is large (thousands of submissions; Vienna 2026 drew 8,000+ attendees); historical acceptance rates have floated in the 40-45% band, far gentler than ML flagship venues but with high variance across areas. Treat any specific rate as unverified until the year's numbers are published.
- Acceptance is to the program as a whole; presentation format (interactive/ poster session structure) is a program decision, not a quality tier ranking in the proceedings record.
- Decisions are binary. "Reject with encouraging reviews" is the common fate of good-but-thin papers; the correct read is "fund one more experiment rung and resubmit" (IROS in March, RA-L any time).
Contrast with RA-L review
Authors choosing between routes (see icra-topic-selection) should model the
review differences, not just the deadlines:
- RA-L is journal review: an AE plus reviewers, a first decision targeted within ~3 months, and crucially a revise-and-resubmit outcome that lets authors answer reviewers with a response letter — the interaction ICRA lacks.
- RA-L decisions bind publication in the journal; conference presentation is a separate transfer step afterward.
- The reviewer pools overlap heavily; a paper rejected at ICRA and sent to RA-L unchanged may meet the same reviewer with the same objection — revise first.
Reading a decision packet
- Sort comments into: factual error (yours), misunderstanding (their reading, your ambiguity), scope demand (wants a different paper), and taste.
- Reject case: fix the first two categories before any resubmission clock; a misunderstanding at ICRA predicts the same misunderstanding at IROS.
- Accept case: triage which comments to honor in camera-ready given the
8-page-total final limit (
icra-camera-ready). - Update your model: which claims drew fire predicts how to scope the next submission's evidence ladder.
Output format
[Stage] pre-submission / under review / decision received
[Pipeline model] AE area = <keyword>, predicted reviewer pool concern: <one line>
[No-rebuttal mitigation] top 3 objections pre-answered in draft: <list>
[Decision triage] factual / misunderstanding / scope / taste = <counts>
[Next move] camera-ready plan | resubmission target + what changes© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Icra Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icra Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Get Jobagentenatalie/get-job.skill | 632 | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 | |
| Resume Reviewerweeelin98/ResumeDom | 173 | — | ~2.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Build Resume Portfolio Sitetao943/build-resume-portfolio-site | 195 | — | ~5.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Cyber Resume Reviewermubix/cyber-resume-reviewer-skill | 184 | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Repo To Resume TailorSsabby1/repo-to-resume-tailor | 127 | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Resume Reviewer
weeelin98/ResumeDom
Build, assess, review, and tailor evidence-backed US-market technology resumes for computer-science interns and new graduates.
Build Resume Portfolio Site
tao943/build-resume-portfolio-site
A skill your agent uses when turning resume materials and an optional job description into verified, approved content and a runnable React + Vite resume or portfolio site, or when redesigning an…
Cyber Resume Reviewer
mubix/cyber-resume-reviewer-skill
Review, tailor, score, or rewrite IT and cybersecurity resumes.
Repo To Resume Tailor
Ssabby1/repo-to-resume-tailor
Analyze a full code repository and generate one resume-ready project description grounded in repository evidence.
GitHub Project Contributor Finder API Skill
browser-act/skills
This skill helps users extract GitHub repository project details and contributor contact information using keywords, stars, and update dates.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Icra Review Process
What does Icra Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when explaining or strategizing around ICRA's review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors, reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza…. Icra Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining or strategizing around ICRA's review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors, reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza, the absence of an author rebuttal in the classic ICRA flow, the January accept/reject decision, and how this differs from RA-L's revise-capable journal review.
When should I use Icra Review Process?
Icra Review Process fits situations like: strategizing around ICRAs review pipeline — the RAS Conference Editorial Board of Editors and Associate Editors; reviewer recruitment through PaperPlaza; the absence of an author rebuttal in the classic ICRA flow; the January accept/reject decision.
How do I install Icra Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/icra-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Icra Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/icra-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Icra Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icra-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/icra-review-process, .gemini/skills/icra-review-process, .github/skills/icra-review-process and .opencode/skills/icra-review-process in your project.
What does Icra Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Icra Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Icra Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Icra Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Icra Review Process use?
Icra Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Icra Review Process use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Icra Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Icra Review Process: Get Job (agentenatalie/get-job.skill, 632 stars), Resume Reviewer (weeelin98/ResumeDom, 173 stars), Build Resume Portfolio Site (tao943/build-resume-portfolio-site, 195 stars) and Cyber Resume Reviewer (mubix/cyber-resume-reviewer-skill, 184 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Icra Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.