A skill your agent uses when positioning an ICLR paper against prior work, concurrent OpenReview submissions, arXiv papers, benchmark lineages, and adjacent learning-representation claims.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Iclr Related Work

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iclr-related-work -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iclr-related-work --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICLR-Skills/skills/iclr-related-work .claude/skills/iclr-related-work && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
iclr-related-work
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
717 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ICLR paper against prior work, concurrent OpenReview submissions, arXiv papers, benchmark lineages, and adjacent learning-representation claims.

  • Works in 5 steps: Acknowledge the cited work in its own… → State the exact overlap without… → Name one difference axis and point to… → …
  • Positioning an ICLR paper against prior work
  • SKILL.md covers Positioning checks, Closest-work decision tree, Novelty statement and Surviving the public comparison, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Iclr Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ICLR paper against prior work, concurrent OpenReview submissions, arXiv papers, benchmark lineages, and adjacent learning-representation claims. Use when a reviewer cites a paper you missed, when a public comment disputes your novelty, or when separating "shares a component with" from "solves the same representation-learning problem" so the claim survives permanent public scrutiny.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review and Positioning and messaging. It works with arXiv. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Positioning an ICLR paper against prior work
  • Concurrent OpenReview submissions
  • Benchmark lineages
  • Adjacent learning-representation claims

Example prompts

  • “shares a component with”
  • “solves the same representation-learning problem”
  • “/iclr-related-work”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Acknowledge the cited work in its own terms.
  2. State the exact overlap without minimizing it.
  3. Name one difference axis and point to the supporting experiment, theorem, or artifact.
  4. Commit a manuscript change: citation, paragraph rewrite, added baseline, or softened claim.
  5. Avoid priority arguments unless dates and versions are documented.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Iclr Related Work loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 107 tokens; SKILL.md has 717 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~107
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 717 words, ~1,589 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/iclr-related-work/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
iclr-related-work
description
Use when positioning an ICLR paper against prior work, concurrent OpenReview submissions, arXiv papers, benchmark lineages, and adjacent learning-representation claims. Use when a reviewer cites a paper you missed, when a public comment disputes your novelty, or when separating "shares a component with" from "solves the same representation-learning problem" so the claim survives permanent public scrutiny.

Use this to make the novelty claim robust under ICLR review. ICLR reviewers often know recent OpenReview, arXiv, and workshop work, so the related-work strategy must survive public comparison.

Positioning checks

  • Identify the closest prior method, theory result, dataset, benchmark, or analysis paper.
  • Separate "uses a similar component" from "solves the same scientific problem."
  • Track concurrent arXiv/OpenReview work and discuss it when a reasonable reviewer would expect it.
  • Compare against strong open-source and widely used baselines, not only papers that are convenient.
  • Explain differences in assumptions, data access, compute budget, evaluation metric, and failure mode.
  • Avoid dismissive language; public discussion can amplify careless related-work claims.

Closest-work decision tree

For each likely "this is just X" comparison, classify the relationship before writing prose.

Relationship to prior workRelated-work actionEvidence needed
Same problem, same method familyTreat as a direct baseline, not a citation footnotehead-to-head result, ablation, or theory delta
Same component, different objectiveExplain the objective and representation changeloss/objective statement plus experiment tied to the claimed change
Same benchmark, different questionExplain what the benchmark now testsmetric interpretation, split/regime difference, or stress test
Same claim, weaker evidenceBe precise and generous; do not imply priority without proofdated citation plus the stronger evidence axis
Concurrent OpenReview/arXiv workCite and scope it without overclaiming precedencedate, venue/status, and one-sentence distinction

If the paper cannot name the closest work and the difference axis, mark novelty risk high and route to iclr-experiments before polishing prose.

Novelty statement

Build the novelty claim as:

text
Prior work can <capability under stated conditions>.
It does not <specific missing capability or explanation>.
This paper shows <new mechanism/result/evidence>, under <scope>.
The claim is supported by <theory/experiment/artifact>.

Add a claim ledger underneath the paragraph:

Claim in paperClosest workDifference axisRequired supportStatus
new capabilitypaper/system Xproblem / assumption / method / evidence / scale / theory / artifactexperiment, proof, artifact, or dataset cardready / weak / missing

Any row marked weak or missing must either be softened in the abstract/introduction or backed by a new result. Do not leave the strongest novelty claim supported only by wording.

Surviving the public comparison

ICLR reviewers and even community members can post a "this is just X" comment that stays online next to your paper forever. The defense is a precise difference axis, decided before submission.

"Just like X" objectionRobust ICLR responseFragile response
Same architectureDifferent objective and what it changes representationally"Ours is bigger"
Same benchmarkDifferent question the benchmark now answersHigher number only
Concurrent arXiv preprintDated, scoped distinction, cited generouslyIgnoring it and hoping
Reuses a known lossThe new analysis or regime where it behaves differentlyRenaming the loss
Show full SKILL.md (299 more words)Show less

Worked vignette

A submission proposes a masked-prediction objective for time-series transformers. A reviewer links a recent arXiv paper with a similar mask. Rather than dispute priority, the authors add a paragraph: the prior work masks contiguous spans for forecasting, while this paper masks frequency components and shows the representation transfers across sampling rates, supported by a transfer ablation. The difference axis is "what is masked and which invariance it buys," not "we got there first."

Reviewer-pushback patterns

  • "You missed paper Y." Add it, state the axis of difference in one sentence, never dismiss it.
  • "Dismissive of prior work." Public threads amplify rudeness; describe prior work in its own terms.
  • "Cherry-picked baselines." Compare against the widely used open-source system, not the convenient one.

Public-thread response contract

When a reviewer or community comment challenges novelty, respond in a way that improves the permanent OpenReview record:

  1. Acknowledge the cited work in its own terms.
  2. State the exact overlap without minimizing it.
  3. Name one difference axis and point to the supporting experiment, theorem, or artifact.
  4. Commit a manuscript change: citation, paragraph rewrite, added baseline, or softened claim.
  5. Avoid priority arguments unless dates and versions are documented.

Escalate from prose to experiments when the difference axis is empirical. If the response would say "we believe our method is different" without a supporting result, novelty risk stays high.

Pre-submission audit

  • Every strong novelty phrase in the abstract/introduction has a row in the claim ledger.
  • Every closest-work row has a baseline, ablation, proof, or artifact pointer.
  • Concurrent work is cited when a reasonable ICLR reviewer would know it.
  • Related work does not rely on "first", "novel", or "significant" unless the support is explicit.
  • The paper can survive a public "this is just X" comment without changing the core claim.

Output format

text
[Closest work] <paper/system/benchmark>
[Difference axis] problem / assumption / method / evidence / scale / theory / artifact
[Claim ledger] <claim -> closest work -> support status>
[Must-cite items] <recent OpenReview/arXiv/ICLR-adjacent work>
[Novelty risk] low / medium / high
[Public response] acknowledgement + overlap + difference + manuscript change
[Revision text] <concise related-work paragraph or bullet>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ICLR-Skills/skills/iclr-related-work of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Iclr Related Work next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Iclr Related Work compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Iclr Related Work this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ijcai Related Workfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~427Automated safety check: PassNone
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Systematic Literature Review Builderbytedance/deer-flow84k2 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Paper Research on arXivXiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code14k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Literature Review AgentAr9av/PaperOrchestra6791 repos~5.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Ijcai Related Work

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI submission against archival AI literature, arXiv preprints, workshop papers, prior rejected versions, dual-submission rules, shortened…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~427 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Searches arXiv across many papers on one topic, extracts each paper's methodology and findings in parallel, and synthesizes a cited literature review.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Paper Research on arXiv

    XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code

    Searches arXiv, fetches metadata, generates BibTeX, downloads PDFs and finds citations and related papers using a bundled Python script.

    14k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review Agent

    Ar9av/PaperOrchestra

    Step 3 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). An agent skill from Ar9av/PaperOrchestra.

    679 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Arxiv MCP Server

    blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server

    A skill your agent uses when finding, comparing, reading, or monitoring arXiv papers, including requests for abstracts, citation graphs, original LaTeX, section-level technical details, or…

    3.2k GitHub stars~353 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Iclr Related Work

What does Iclr Related Work do?

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ICLR paper against prior work, concurrent OpenReview submissions, arXiv papers, benchmark lineages, and adjacent learning-representation claims. Iclr Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ICLR paper against prior work, concurrent OpenReview submissions, arXiv papers, benchmark lineages, and adjacent learning-representation claims.

When should I use Iclr Related Work?

Iclr Related Work fits situations like: positioning an ICLR paper against prior work; concurrent OpenReview submissions; benchmark lineages; adjacent learning-representation claims.

How do I install Iclr Related Work in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iclr-related-work -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICLR-Skills/skills/iclr-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/iclr-related-work in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Iclr Related Work in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iclr-related-work -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICLR-Skills/skills/iclr-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/iclr-related-work in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Iclr Related Work in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iclr-related-work -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/iclr-related-work, .gemini/skills/iclr-related-work, .github/skills/iclr-related-work and .opencode/skills/iclr-related-work in your project.

What does Iclr Related Work need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Iclr Related Work is instructions for the agent only.

Does Iclr Related Work access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Iclr Related Work safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Iclr Related Work use?

Iclr Related Work is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Iclr Related Work use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Iclr Related Work?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Iclr Related Work: Ijcai Related Work (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars), Systematic Literature Review Builder (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars) and Paper Research on arXiv (XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code, 14k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Iclr Related Work?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.