A skill your agent uses when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Icdt Experiments

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icdt-experiments -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills icdt-experiments --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICDT-Skills/skills/icdt-experiments .claude/skills/icdt-experiments && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
icdt-experiments
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
469 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked…

  • Worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations
  • SKILL.md covers Match the evidence to the…, Making the theoretical…, If your paper does include an… and Honesty and scope, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Only for papers with an algorithmic contribution

What it does

Icdt Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with an algorithmic contribution, a proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations
  • Only for papers with an algorithmic contribution
  • A proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution

Example prompts

  • “/icdt-experiments”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Icdt Experiments loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 102 tokens; SKILL.md has 469 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~102
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 469 words, ~1,143 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/icdt-experiments/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
icdt-experiments
description
Use when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with an algorithmic contribution, a proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.

ICDT Experiments

At ICDT the primary "evidence" is a proof, not a benchmark. This skill is about matching your form of evidence to your claim: most ICDT papers are purely theoretical and need no experiments at all, while a minority with a genuine algorithmic contribution benefit from a small, honest evaluation. Bolting a systems-style experiment section onto a theorem paper does not raise its standing — a loose bound or an unproved lemma will still sink it.

Match the evidence to the claim shape

Claim shapePrimary evidenceExperiments?
Complexity of evaluating a query classMatching upper and lower bounds, with proofsNo — the bound is the result
Expressiveness / separationA construction or an Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game establishing the separationNo — a witness, not a benchmark
Decidability / undecidability of a problemAn algorithm + termination proof, or a reduction from an undecidable problemNo
A new algorithm with a claimed practical complexityThe complexity proof plus an optional experiment showing the constants are reasonableOptional, proportional
A dichotomyProof that each side holds and the boundary is exactly as statedNo

The default answer is "the theorem is the evidence." Reach for experiments only when your paper claims something about practice that the asymptotic bound alone does not settle.

Making the theoretical evidence airtight

  • Tightness: if you claim a bound is tight, prove both directions and label which is the upper and which the lower. A one-sided bound presented as a complete answer is the classic "revise."
  • The right complexity measure: be explicit about data vs combined vs query complexity, and prove the bound in the measure you claim it for.
  • Worked examples and counterexamples: a small concrete database and query that illustrates the construction, or a counterexample that rules out a tempting stronger statement, is high-value evidence a referee can check by hand — include it in the body.
  • Corner cases: state what happens at the boundaries of your class (empty instances, cyclic vs acyclic, bounded arity) rather than leaving the referee to wonder whether a case breaks the proof.
Show full SKILL.md (132 more words)Show less

If your paper does include an experiment

Some ICDT papers contribute an algorithm whose worst-case bound understates or overstates its behavior on realistic inputs. If you evaluate it, do so with the rigor the theory earns:

text
[Purpose]     state exactly what the experiment tests that the proof does not (e.g., typical-case
              runtime, the size of the hidden constant, scaling on real query workloads)
[Subjects]    real or standard benchmark data/queries, described precisely; no cherry-picked inputs
[Baseline]    a fair comparison (a prior algorithm, a naive method) implemented honestly
[Reporting]   enough runs, hardware stated, and results that support only what you claim
[Scope]       the experiment supplements the theorem; it never substitutes for a missing proof

Keep it proportional: an ICDT experiment is a paragraph-to-a-page confirmation, not a systems-paper evaluation. If the experiment is the contribution, the paper likely belongs at EDBT/SIGMOD, not ICDT (see icdt-topic-selection).

Honesty and scope

  • Do not report an experiment whose setup you would not want a referee to reproduce; ICDT referees are skeptical of evaluations that appear to decorate a theorem.
  • Do not claim practical impact the experiment does not show — "faster on our three instances" is not "faster in practice."
  • State the model assumptions your algorithm relies on and whether the experiment respects them.

Output format

text
[Claim -> evidence] <each claim -> proof (bounds/construction) or experiment>
[Tightness] bounds matched and labeled? yes/no/na
[Complexity measure] data / combined / query, proven in the claimed measure? yes/no
[Experiment] none (theory-complete) / proportional supplement / over-scoped (reroute?)
[Fix queue] <ordered: close bound gaps first, then examples, then any experiment>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ICDT-Skills/skills/icdt-experiments of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Icdt Experiments next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Icdt Experiments compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Icdt Experiments this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Internal Commsalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Internal Communicationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Finding ExperimentsPostHog/posthog40k—~783Automated safety check: PassCustom licence
Internal Communications Writeranthropics/skills180k38 repos~378Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
ExperimentsArize-ai/phoenix12k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Internal Comms

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a Head of People Ops, BizOps lead, or Internal Communications owner needs to draft and sequence an internal-only change-management communication — a re-org announcement…

    28k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Internal Communication

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Internal communication log: title, type, date, department, host and attendees, agenda, action items, follow-up date, meeting link and delivery status.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.4k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Finding Experiments

    PostHog/posthog

    Official

    Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing experiment-list (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match.

    40k GitHub stars~783 tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Official

    A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill…

    180k GitHub starsUsed in 38 repos~378 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Experiments

    Arize-ai/phoenix

    Run, read, and compare dataset-backed experiments to find evidence that a prompt or pipeline is improving.

    12k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated today
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Internal Comms Anthropic

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Compatibility alias for internal-comms: draft status updates, newsletters and FAQs from approved sources.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~702 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Icdt Experiments

What does Icdt Experiments do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked…. Icdt Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with an algorithmic contribution, a proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.

When should I use Icdt Experiments?

Icdt Experiments fits situations like: worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations; only for papers with an algorithmic contribution; A proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.

How do I install Icdt Experiments in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icdt-experiments -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICDT-Skills/skills/icdt-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/icdt-experiments in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Icdt Experiments in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icdt-experiments -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICDT-Skills/skills/icdt-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/icdt-experiments in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Icdt Experiments in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icdt-experiments -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/icdt-experiments, .gemini/skills/icdt-experiments, .github/skills/icdt-experiments and .opencode/skills/icdt-experiments in your project.

What does Icdt Experiments need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Icdt Experiments is instructions for the agent only.

Does Icdt Experiments access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Icdt Experiments safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Icdt Experiments use?

Icdt Experiments is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Icdt Experiments use?

About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Icdt Experiments?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Icdt Experiments: Internal Comms (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Internal Communication (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Finding Experiments (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars) and Internal Communications Writer (anthropics/skills, 180k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Icdt Experiments?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.