Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
A skill your agent uses when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and…
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibility --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "iccv-reproducibility" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility into .claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-reproducibility", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibilityType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibility --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .agents/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-reproducibility" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility into .agents/skills/iccv-reproducibility/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-reproducibility", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibility --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .cursor/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "iccv-reproducibility" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility into .cursor/skills/iccv-reproducibility/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-reproducibility", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibility --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .gemini/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-reproducibility" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility into .gemini/skills/iccv-reproducibility/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-reproducibility", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibilityInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .github/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-reproducibility" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility into .github/skills/iccv-reproducibility/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-reproducibility", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibility --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .opencode/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-reproducibility" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility into .opencode/skills/iccv-reproducibility/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-reproducibility", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
iccv-reproducibilityA skill your agent uses when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and…
Iccv Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations, seed and variance honesty at vision training scale, and writing results that stay checkable across the two-year gap to the next ICCV.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are toml).
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Iccv Reproducibility loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 721 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 721 words, ~1,616 tokens.
.claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).ICCV 2025 imposed no compute-reporting form and no reproducibility checklist that could be verified at check time (2026-07-08) — which means the venue's reproducibility bar is enforced socially: by reviewers who re-implement things for a living, and by a two-year horizon in which your paper is the standing reference until the next ICCV. Absent a form, the paper itself must carry the full disclosure. This skill is the audit.
A CVPR paper gets superseded in twelve months; an ICCV paper's numbers get re-quoted, re-run, and re-attacked for at least twenty-four. Write every result so that a stranger in the next odd year can adjudicate a discrepancy:
Much post-2023 ICCV work evaluates around large pretrained models, which adds reproducibility failure modes that classical training-recipe disclosure never covered:
| Moving part | What to pin in the paper |
|---|---|
| Backbone / VLM checkpoint | Exact identifier and revision hash, not the family name |
| Prompts and templates | Verbatim, in the supplement, including the ensemble if any |
| API-served models (if unavoidable) | Access dates + version string; state that decommissioning breaks exact reproduction |
| Zero-shot class lists / vocabularies | The literal list, since "the standard 80 classes" has variants |
| Retrieval corpora / support sets | Snapshot date and filtering rules |
A "zero-shot" table whose prompt engineering is unstated is not zero-anything; reviewers at ICCV increasingly ask.
Maintain one machine-readable record per reported row, from the first experiment, and generate the implementation section from it rather than reconstructing memories in deadline week:
# ledger/tab2_row5.toml — the row is reproducible iff this file is complete
model = "ours-large"
init = "vitl14-<hash>, corpus: <name+version>"
data = { train = "co3d-v2@sha256:...", eval = "co3d-v2-test-list.txt" }
schedule = { optim = "adamw", lr = 3e-4, epochs = 60, batch = 512, warmup = 5 }
aug = ["rrc-336", "hflip"]
seeds = [0, 1, 2] # or [0] with flagged=true
hardware = "16xA100-40G, bf16"
eval = { resolution = 336, tta = false, metric_impl = "<repo>@<tag>" }
command = "python train.py -c configs/tab2_row5.toml"The ledger also answers rebuttal-week questions in minutes ("which schedule made Fig. 5?") — at ICCV those questions arrive in a seven-day window in May.
Nobody multi-seeds a 16-GPU week ten times, and pretending otherwise persuades no one. The defensible pattern, stated in the paper's own words: cheap decisive experiments (the headline ablation, the small-backbone variant) run with ≥3 seeds and reported as mean ± std; the flagship run flagged explicitly as single; and no claim in the abstract resting on a margin smaller than the seed noise visible in your own tables. For stochastic evaluation (generation, sampling- based detection), repeat the evaluation pass and report its spread separately from training variance — the two get conflated constantly.
No mandated form means you choose the disclosure, and the cheap honest version is one paragraph: total GPU-hours for the flagship, per-experiment cost for the grid, hardware and precision, and wall-clock per training run. Two reasons to volunteer it. Reviewers calibrate "simple and effective" claims against what the method costs to obtain; and any efficiency or "real-time" adjective in your abstract is unfalsifiable without named hardware — an easy weakness for a reviewer to poke in a cycle where you get one page of rebuttal to answer.
Benchmarks with evaluation servers turn your test number into a receipt rather than a rerunnable command. Record submission IDs and dates in the ledger, stay inside per-week submission budgets (tuning on the server is the field's canonical sin and organizers publish shame lists), and always give readers the validation-set protocol whose numbers predict the server's — that is what they will actually reproduce.
State the posture instead of implying perfection: which RNGs were seeded, whether deterministic kernels were enabled (and the throughput cost if not), known nondeterminism sources (scatter atomics, multi-GPU reduction order, dataloader scheduling), and the reproduction tolerance you measured across identical-seed reruns. One measured tolerance sentence ("±0.15 mIoU across nodes") converts future "failed to reproduce" issues into calibration checks.
iccv-experiments covers the drift audit).[Checkability grade] two-year test: pass / gaps
[Ledger coverage] rows with complete recipes: n/m
[Foundation-model pins] checkpoints · prompts · vocabularies · API versions: pinned?
[Variance] multi-seeded: <list>; flagged single runs: <list>; claims vs noise: OK?
[Compute paragraph] present with hardware + GPU-hours: yes/no
[Fix list] <ordered by what a re-implementer hits first>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Just SKILL.md in ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Iccv Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iccv Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw | 617 | 1 repos | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science | 5.5k | — | ~2.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Figure Styleaipoch/open-science | 5.5k | — | ~5.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia | 522 | — | ~4.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
xjtulyc/MedgeClaw
Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.
aipoch/open-science
Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.
aipoch/open-science
Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.
bactopia/bactopia
Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.
yushui2022/MathModel-Skill
Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Categories
A skill your agent uses when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and…. Iccv Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations, seed and variance honesty at vision training scale, and writing results that stay checkable across the two-year gap to the next ICCV.
Iccv Reproducibility fits situations like: hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper; covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form; protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations; seed and variance honesty at vision training scale.
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/iccv-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/iccv-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/iccv-reproducibility, .github/skills/iccv-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/iccv-reproducibility in your project.
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Iccv Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Iccv Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Iccv Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.