A skill your agent uses when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Iccv Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility .claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
iccv-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
721 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and…

  • Hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper
  • SKILL.md covers The two-year checkability test, Foundation-model era: pin the…, Recipe as a build artifact and Variance honesty at vision…, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form

What it does

Iccv Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations, seed and variance honesty at vision training scale, and writing results that stay checkable across the two-year gap to the next ICCV.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper
  • Covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form
  • Protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations
  • Seed and variance honesty at vision training scale

Example prompts

  • “/iccv-reproducibility”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are toml).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Iccv Reproducibility loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 721 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~87
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 721 words, ~1,616 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
iccv-reproducibility
description
Use when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations, seed and variance honesty at vision training scale, and writing results that stay checkable across the two-year gap to the next ICCV.

ICCV Reproducibility

ICCV 2025 imposed no compute-reporting form and no reproducibility checklist that could be verified at check time (2026-07-08) — which means the venue's reproducibility bar is enforced socially: by reviewers who re-implement things for a living, and by a two-year horizon in which your paper is the standing reference until the next ICCV. Absent a form, the paper itself must carry the full disclosure. This skill is the audit.

The two-year checkability test

A CVPR paper gets superseded in twelve months; an ICCV paper's numbers get re-quoted, re-run, and re-attacked for at least twenty-four. Write every result so that a stranger in the next odd year can adjudicate a discrepancy:

  • Dataset version and split files named (not "standard split" — the standard moves), with checksums where licenses allow.
  • Metric implementation cited by repo and version; identically named metrics differ across codebases by more than typical paper deltas.
  • Pretraining corpus and checkpoint identified for every initialization; a gain that rides an undisclosed web-scale pretrain is a different claim than the paper makes.
  • Evaluation resolution, crop policy, and test-time augmentation stated per table, since these silently absorb whole points.

Foundation-model era: pin the protocol, not just the seed

Much post-2023 ICCV work evaluates around large pretrained models, which adds reproducibility failure modes that classical training-recipe disclosure never covered:

Moving partWhat to pin in the paper
Backbone / VLM checkpointExact identifier and revision hash, not the family name
Prompts and templatesVerbatim, in the supplement, including the ensemble if any
API-served models (if unavoidable)Access dates + version string; state that decommissioning breaks exact reproduction
Zero-shot class lists / vocabulariesThe literal list, since "the standard 80 classes" has variants
Retrieval corpora / support setsSnapshot date and filtering rules

A "zero-shot" table whose prompt engineering is unstated is not zero-anything; reviewers at ICCV increasingly ask.

Recipe as a build artifact

Maintain one machine-readable record per reported row, from the first experiment, and generate the implementation section from it rather than reconstructing memories in deadline week:

toml
# ledger/tab2_row5.toml — the row is reproducible iff this file is complete
model      = "ours-large"
init       = "vitl14-<hash>, corpus: <name+version>"
data       = { train = "co3d-v2@sha256:...", eval = "co3d-v2-test-list.txt" }
schedule   = { optim = "adamw", lr = 3e-4, epochs = 60, batch = 512, warmup = 5 }
aug        = ["rrc-336", "hflip"]
seeds      = [0, 1, 2]            # or [0] with flagged=true
hardware   = "16xA100-40G, bf16"
eval       = { resolution = 336, tta = false, metric_impl = "<repo>@<tag>" }
command    = "python train.py -c configs/tab2_row5.toml"

The ledger also answers rebuttal-week questions in minutes ("which schedule made Fig. 5?") — at ICCV those questions arrive in a seven-day window in May.

Variance honesty at vision budgets

Nobody multi-seeds a 16-GPU week ten times, and pretending otherwise persuades no one. The defensible pattern, stated in the paper's own words: cheap decisive experiments (the headline ablation, the small-backbone variant) run with ≥3 seeds and reported as mean ± std; the flagship run flagged explicitly as single; and no claim in the abstract resting on a margin smaller than the seed noise visible in your own tables. For stochastic evaluation (generation, sampling- based detection), repeat the evaluation pass and report its spread separately from training variance — the two get conflated constantly.

Show full SKILL.md (270 more words)Show less

Compute disclosure without a form

No mandated form means you choose the disclosure, and the cheap honest version is one paragraph: total GPU-hours for the flagship, per-experiment cost for the grid, hardware and precision, and wall-clock per training run. Two reasons to volunteer it. Reviewers calibrate "simple and effective" claims against what the method costs to obtain; and any efficiency or "real-time" adjective in your abstract is unfalsifiable without named hardware — an easy weakness for a reviewer to poke in a cycle where you get one page of rebuttal to answer.

Withheld test sets and server etiquette

Benchmarks with evaluation servers turn your test number into a receipt rather than a rerunnable command. Record submission IDs and dates in the ledger, stay inside per-week submission budgets (tuning on the server is the field's canonical sin and organizers publish shame lists), and always give readers the validation-set protocol whose numbers predict the server's — that is what they will actually reproduce.

Determinism paragraph, written once

State the posture instead of implying perfection: which RNGs were seeded, whether deterministic kernels were enabled (and the throughput cost if not), known nondeterminism sources (scatter atomics, multi-GPU reduction order, dataloader scheduling), and the reproduction tolerance you measured across identical-seed reruns. One measured tolerance sentence ("±0.15 mIoU across nodes") converts future "failed to reproduce" issues into calibration checks.

Reverify each cycle

  • Whether 2027 introduces any reproducibility checklist, compute form, or code-submission expectation (none verified for 2025).
  • Benchmark version churn since the last cycle — two years is long in dataset time (iccv-experiments covers the drift audit).
  • Current supplement constraints that bound how much recipe detail ships.

Output format

text
[Checkability grade] two-year test: pass / gaps
[Ledger coverage] rows with complete recipes: n/m
[Foundation-model pins] checkpoints · prompts · vocabularies · API versions: pinned?
[Variance] multi-seeded: <list>; flagged single runs: <list>; claims vs noise: OK?
[Compute paragraph] present with hardware + GPU-hours: yes/no
[Fix list] <ordered by what a re-implementer hits first>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Iccv Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Iccv Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Iccv Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Iccv Reproducibility

What does Iccv Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and…. Iccv Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper, covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form, protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations, seed and variance honesty at vision training scale, and writing results that stay checkable across the two-year gap to the next ICCV.

When should I use Iccv Reproducibility?

Iccv Reproducibility fits situations like: hardening the reproducibility story of an ICCV paper; covering full recipe disclosure without a mandated compute form; protocol pinning for foundation-model and zero-shot evaluations; seed and variance honesty at vision training scale.

How do I install Iccv Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/iccv-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Iccv Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/iccv-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Iccv Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/iccv-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/iccv-reproducibility, .github/skills/iccv-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/iccv-reproducibility in your project.

What does Iccv Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Iccv Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Iccv Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Iccv Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Iccv Reproducibility use?

Iccv Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Iccv Reproducibility use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Iccv Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Iccv Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Iccv Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.