Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
A skill your agent uses when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Iccv Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response .claude/skills/iccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "iccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response into .claude/skills/iccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response .agents/skills/iccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response into .agents/skills/iccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response .cursor/skills/iccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "iccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response into .cursor/skills/iccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response .gemini/skills/iccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response into .gemini/skills/iccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response .github/skills/iccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response into .github/skills/iccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills iccv-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response .opencode/skills/iccv-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "iccv-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response into .opencode/skills/iccv-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "iccv-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
iccv-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.7k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 781 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no…
- Works in 5 steps: A reviewer misstates the paper — highest… → A requested number you can produce —… → A fairness challenge to your comparisons… → …
- ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window
- SKILL.md covers Constraints that define the…, The seven days, scheduled, Choosing what fits the page and Formatting the page for a…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Iccv Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no attachments or links are allowed, addressing reviewers who are themselves deadline-crushed authors, and writing for the meta-review that follows.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window
- Covering the official templates constraints
- Evidence selection when no attachments
- Links are allowed
Example prompts
- “/iccv-author-response”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- A reviewer misstates the paper — highest priority, cheapest to win: quote
- A requested number you can produce — small ablation, runtime on named
- A fairness challenge to your comparisons — answer with protocol facts
- Novelty skepticism — two sentences of mechanism-level delta against the
- Requests for a new benchmark, a new method variant, human studies —
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are latex).
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Iccv Author Response loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 781 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 781 words, ~1,673 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/iccv-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- iccv-author-response
- description
- Use when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no attachments or links are allowed, addressing reviewers who are themselves deadline-crushed authors, and writing for the meta-review that follows.
ICCV Author Response
In the 2025 cycle (verified 2026-07-08), reviews reached authors on May 9 and the rebuttal closed May 16: seven days to answer every reviewer in one page, using the rebuttal template from the official author kit. Decisions followed in late June with no further author input. This skill turns that week into a production schedule and the page into an argument budget.
Constraints that define the genre
- One page, official template, PDF. Over-length or reformatted responses are disregarded at CVF venues — squeezing margins is the same as writing nothing.
- Anonymous, no external links, no attachments. A number you cannot state in a sentence or a tiny table does not exist for this rebuttal.
- No new contributions. The rebuttal corrects errors, supplies requested clarifications, and reports small requested checks — it does not extend the paper.
- The audience is layered: reviewers first, then the AC writing the meta-review during the discussion that runs after your window closes. Write sentences an AC can lift verbatim.
The seven days, scheduled
| Day | Work | Anti-pattern being prevented |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Read everything once; no drafting; log each objection with reviewer ID and a fixability tag | Rage-drafting that leaks tone into the final text |
| 2 | Decide the page's allocation; launch any small requested runs (they must finish by day 5) | Discovering on day 6 that the decisive number needs three days of GPU |
| 3–4 | Draft; every paragraph = quoted objection → paper location → fact | Essays about the paper's importance |
| 5 | Freeze experiments; integrate numbers; cut to one page by deleting whole items, not words | Ten answers at three lines each, all too thin to land |
| 6 | Cold read by a coauthor who did not draft; check template compliance | In-group blindness to a condescending sentence |
| 7 | Upload early; the deadline hour is for failures, not first uploads | Panic edits after midnight |
Choosing what fits the page
Not every objection earns space. Rank by expected score movement times credibility of your answer:
- A reviewer misstates the paper — highest priority, cheapest to win: quote their sentence, quote yours, cite section and line. Every downstream weakness built on the misreading falls with it.
- A requested number you can produce — small ablation, runtime on named hardware, a matched-backbone re-run. Report it as a two-to-five-row table.
- A fairness challenge to your comparisons — answer with protocol facts (same splits, same pretraining, same schedule) or concede the asterisk and scope the claim; a precise concession reads as strength during discussion.
- Novelty skepticism — two sentences of mechanism-level delta against the named prior work. Never argue "first"; argue different and consequential.
- Requests for a new benchmark, a new method variant, human studies — decline in one polite line as out of rebuttal scope. Reviewers know the rules; the AC certainly does.
Anything ranked below the fold gets one clause or nothing. A one-page rebuttal that lands three arguments beats one that gestures at nine.
Show full SKILL.md (301 more words)Show less
Formatting the page for a skimming AC
% Inside the official rebuttal template — structure by objection, not by reviewer
\noindent\textbf{[R2,R4] Backbone fairness.} R2: ``gains may come from the
stronger encoder.'' All rows of Tab.~2 share ViT-B/16 initialized from the same
checkpoint (Sec.~4.1). Under R2's requested ResNet-50 setting: ours 41.3 vs
baseline 39.8 mIoU (3 seeds, std 0.2).
\noindent\textbf{[R1] ``No occlusion analysis.''} Sec.~5.3 and Fig.~6 report
exactly this; we will make the pointer explicit in the caption.
\noindent\textbf{[R4] Concurrent work X (arXiv, Feb).} Posted three weeks before
the deadline; we will cite as concurrent. Mechanism differs: X re-ranks
proposals, we modify the matching cost (no proposal stage).Shared objections get one merged heading with both reviewer IDs — answering the same point twice wastes the scarcest resource the format has.
Tone rules with venue-specific reasons
Your reviewers are simultaneously authors sweating their own submissions, and the
2025 cycle showed chairs act on reviewer misconduct (LLM-written or careless
reviews were desk-reject grounds for the reviewer's papers). Two consequences.
First, if a review is demonstrably negligent or machine-generated, the rebuttal is
not the place to litigate it — state facts flatly there, and raise the conduct
evidence through the confidential channel (see iccv-review-process). Second,
assume good faith in the text itself: "R3 may have missed Sec. 4.2" survives
discussion week; sarcasm gets quoted against you.
What the rebuttal cannot do
If all reviews converge on absent evidence — the missing dataset, the unmatched
comparison — the page cannot manufacture it, and reviewers are not permitted to
demand major new experiments anyway. Spend a day of the week, not all seven, then
redirect the team to the fallback ladder (iccv-workflow): ECCV's next spring
deadline, CVPR in November, or (if it recurs) the Findings outlet for sound work.
Numbers etiquette inside the page
Small-run results reported in a rebuttal carry review-period obligations: state
seeds and settings in the table caption even at miniature scale ("3 seeds,
matched schedule"), never contradict the paper's own protocol silently, and
carry every rebuttal number into the camera-ready if accepted — the promise
diff in iccv-camera-ready starts from this page. A rebuttal number that later
vanishes from the paper is remembered by exactly the people who requested it.
Reverify each cycle
- Rebuttal existence, exact window, and page cap for 2027 — 待核实 until posted.
- Template location in the current author kit.
- Whether any interactive discussion with reviewers exists (2025 was one PDF, no back-and-forth).
Output format
[File or fold] rebuttal worth filing: yes/no (reason)
[Page allocation] <objection → lines> summing to one page
[Runs launched] <experiment → finishes by day 5? owner>
[Misreads to kill] <review quote → paper location>
[Concessions] <what we scope down, in one sentence each>
[Conduct channel] anything for confidential escalation: no / summary© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Iccv Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iccv Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Author Response Builderaipoch/medical-research-skills | 1.9k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Rebuttal ResponseM1n-n9/paper-lifecycle | 693 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Hermes Agent Skill AuthoringNousResearch/hermes-agent | 252k | — | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Fast Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Author Response Builder
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses.
Rebuttal Response
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle
Plan, triage, and write academic rebuttals and review responses.
Hermes Agent Skill Authoring
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
Icassp Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Iccv Author Response
What does Iccv Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no…. Iccv Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no attachments or links are allowed, addressing reviewers who are themselves deadline-crushed authors, and writing for the meta-review that follows.
When should I use Iccv Author Response?
Iccv Author Response fits situations like: ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window; covering the official templates constraints; evidence selection when no attachments; links are allowed.
How do I install Iccv Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/iccv-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Iccv Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/iccv-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Iccv Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/iccv-author-response, .gemini/skills/iccv-author-response, .github/skills/iccv-author-response and .opencode/skills/iccv-author-response in your project.
What does Iccv Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Iccv Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Iccv Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Iccv Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Iccv Author Response use?
Iccv Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Iccv Author Response use?
About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Iccv Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Iccv Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Author Response Builder (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars), Rebuttal Response (M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle, 693 stars) and Hermes Agent Skill Authoring (NousResearch/hermes-agent, 252k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Iccv Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.