Clinical Trials Database
google-deepmind/science-skills
Query ClinicalTrials.gov via APIv2. An agent skill from google-deepmind/science-skills.
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental…
Install Hrm Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hrm-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process .claude/skills/hrm-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "hrm-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process into .claude/skills/hrm-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hrm-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hrm-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process .agents/skills/hrm-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "hrm-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process into .agents/skills/hrm-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hrm-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hrm-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process .cursor/skills/hrm-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "hrm-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process into .cursor/skills/hrm-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hrm-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hrm-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process .gemini/skills/hrm-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "hrm-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process into .gemini/skills/hrm-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hrm-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hrm-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process .github/skills/hrm-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "hrm-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process into .github/skills/hrm-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hrm-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hrm-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process .opencode/skills/hrm-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "hrm-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process into .opencode/skills/hrm-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hrm-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
hrm-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 580 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental…
- Works in 5 steps: EIC fit-and-relevance screen. The… → Routing. Papers that pass are assigned… → Double-blind peer review. Typically… → …
- Calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley HRM) editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How HRM review works (durable…, HRM is developmental and… and Reading the decision letter, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Hrm Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response (hrm-rebuttal).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Recruiting and HR and Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley HRM) editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen
- Double-blind peer review
- The developmental R&R culture
- Reading a decision letter
Example prompts
- “/hrm-review-process”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- EIC fit-and-relevance screen. The Editor-in-Chief decides whether a paper meets the journal's quality and relevance bar before it is sent…
- Routing. Papers that pass are assigned to an associate/action editor in the relevant domain (strategic HRM, micro/OB, employment…
- Double-blind peer review. Typically several reviewers, who cannot see author identities, evaluate the contribution, the design rigor…
- Action-editor synthesis. The action editor weighs the reviews, forms an independent judgment, and writes the decision letter. The editor's…
- Decision. Common outcomes: reject; reject with encouragement to resubmit as new; major revision (R&R); minor revision; (rarely) accept…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Hrm Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 580 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 580 words, ~1,262 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/hrm-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- hrm-review-process
- description
- Use when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response (hrm-rebuttal).
Understanding the Review Process (hrm-review-process)
When to trigger
- Before submitting, to calibrate timeline and decision-type expectations
- A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it (R&R vs. reject; major vs. minor)
- You want to know how much weight the action editor vs. reviewers carry
- You are planning a revision strategy before drafting the response (then go to
hrm-rebuttal)
How HRM review works (durable norms; verify specifics on the official site)
- EIC fit-and-relevance screen. The Editor-in-Chief decides whether a paper meets the journal's quality and relevance bar before it is sent out. A paper missing either half of the dual contribution — a scholarly advance or a practical implication — is desk-rejected here. This is the single biggest filter at HRM.
- Routing. Papers that pass are assigned to an associate/action editor in the relevant domain (strategic HRM, micro/OB, employment relations, etc.).
- Double-blind peer review. Typically several reviewers, who cannot see author identities, evaluate the contribution, the design rigor (multilevel structure, CMB, endogeneity, construct validity), and the practice payoff. Anonymization failures can derail this stage.
- Action-editor synthesis. The action editor weighs the reviews, forms an independent judgment, and writes the decision letter. The editor's letter — not a vote count — drives the outcome.
- Decision. Common outcomes: reject; reject with encouragement to resubmit as new; major revision (R&R); minor revision; (rarely) accept. First-round acceptance is essentially unheard of.
Editorial team, exact timelines, and policies change. As of 2026-06, Co-Editors-in-Chief are Fang Lee Cooke and Shaun Pichler (Co-EIC from Jan 2025) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Verify the current team and turnaround on the official Wiley page; the norms above are durable.
HRM is developmental and multi-round
An R&R is an invitation to improve the paper over (often) multiple rounds, not a near-acceptance. Expect reviewers and the action editor to push hard on the theoretical mechanism, the method (CMB, endogeneity of HR adoption, aggregation, construct validity), and the practice relevance. Treat an R&R as a serious opportunity, not a rejection.
Show full SKILL.md (254 more words)Show less
Reading the decision letter
- Extract the editor's priorities first. The action editor's letter signals which reviewer points are essential vs. optional; address the editor's framing above all.
- Separate fatal from fixable. If a core identification, construct-validity, or contribution concern is fatal and unaddressable, an honest reframe (or a different paper) beats a doomed revision.
- Gauge encouragement. "We see promise" + major revision signals a real path; "does not meet our contribution bar" signals reject.
- Categorize every comment into: theory / method / analysis / framing (incl. practice payoff) / writing — this map becomes the revision plan that feeds
hrm-rebuttal. - Watch the dual bar. HRM reviewers often accept the rigor but doubt the practice payoff, or vice versa; identify which half is in question.
Checklist
- Decision type identified (R&R major/minor, reject-resubmit, reject)
- The action editor's priorities extracted and ranked above individual reviewer asks
- Every reviewer comment categorized (theory / method / analysis / framing / writing)
- Fatal vs. fixable concerns separated honestly
- Which half of the dual contribution is doubted is identified
- Feasibility of demanded new theory/data/analyses assessed against the deadline
- Reviewer conflicts noted for the editor's attention
Anti-patterns
- Treating an R&R as a near-acceptance and making only cosmetic changes
- Treating an R&R as a rejection and walking away from a viable path
- Counting reviewer votes instead of reading the action editor's letter
- Over-investing in a minor reviewer point while ignoring the editor's stated priorities
- Fixing only the rigor when the doubt is about the practice payoff (or vice versa)
- Starting to write the response letter before mapping and planning the revision
Output format
【Journal】Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM")
【Skill】hrm-review-process
【Decision type】R&R(major/minor) / reject-resubmit / reject
【Editor's priorities】1... 2... 3...
【Comment map】theory:[...] method:[...] analysis:[...] framing/practice:[...] writing:[...]
【Dual-bar doubt】scholarly advance? practice payoff? both?
【Fatal vs. fixable】...
【New work needed】theory / data / analysis — feasible by deadline?
【Next skill】hrm-rebuttal (plan revisions, then draft response)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Hrm Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hrm Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Clinical Trials Databasegoogle-deepmind/science-skills | 3.2k | 2 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Professor Fit Analyzervoidful/academic-skills | 135 | — | ~13k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Inclusion Criteria Genaipoch/medical-research-skills | 1.9k | — | ~3.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Patient Recruitment Ad Genaipoch/medical-research-skills | 1.9k | — | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Taipei Permit Drawing Standardsh30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB | 158 | — | ~4.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
Similar skills
Professor Fit Analyzer
voidful/academic-skills
analyze a professor from google scholar, publication lists, personal websites, lab pages, and field-specific bibliographic databases (e.g., DBLP, PubMed, SSRN, PhilPapers, MathSciNet, arXiv, Scopus)…
Inclusion Criteria Gen
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Generate and optimize clinical trial subject inclusion/exclusion criteria to balance scientific rigor with recruitment feasibility.
Patient Recruitment Ad Gen
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Generate ethical, compliant, and patient-friendly recruitment advertisements for clinical trials.
Taipei Permit Drawing Standards
h30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB
This skill should be used when preparing, reviewing, or indexing Taipei City building permit drawing sets (A101-A7), verifying the 44-item application document checklist, setting up N-prefix…
Pp Clinical Trials
mvanhorn/printing-press-library
A multi-source clinical-trials intelligence system — aggregates, normalizes, and analyzes trials across ClinicalTrials.gov, EU CTIS, and biomedical sources, with an offline SQLite engine no…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Hrm Review Process
What does Hrm Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental…. Hrm Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental R&R culture, and reading a decision letter.
When should I use Hrm Review Process?
Hrm Review Process fits situations like: calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley HRM) editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen; double-blind peer review; the developmental R&R culture; reading a decision letter.
How do I install Hrm Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/hrm-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Hrm Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Human-Resource-Management-Skills/skills/hrm-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/hrm-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Hrm Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/hrm-review-process, .gemini/skills/hrm-review-process, .github/skills/hrm-review-process and .opencode/skills/hrm-review-process in your project.
What does Hrm Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Hrm Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Hrm Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Hrm Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Hrm Review Process use?
Hrm Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Hrm Review Process use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Hrm Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Hrm Review Process: Clinical Trials Database (google-deepmind/science-skills, 3.2k stars), Professor Fit Analyzer (voidful/academic-skills, 135 stars), Inclusion Criteria Gen (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars) and Patient Recruitment Ad Gen (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Hrm Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.