A skill your agent uses when writing the single ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper rebuttal that responds to three external reviewers and two area chairs — triaging study-design and statistics critiques…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Hri Author Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hri-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/HRI-Skills/skills/hri-author-response .claude/skills/hri-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
hri-author-response
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
696 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when writing the single ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper rebuttal that responds to three external reviewers and two area chairs — triaging study-design and statistics critiques…

  • Correcting misreadings
  • SKILL.md covers Before writing: triage every…, Answer the HRI-typical critiques, Promise only what the… and Structure and constraints, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Promising only what a camera-ready can deliver

What it does

Hri Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the single ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper rebuttal that responds to three external reviewers and two area chairs — triaging study-design and statistics critiques, correcting misreadings, promising only what a camera-ready can deliver, staying anonymous and within the length limit, and giving the online reviewer discussion reasons to raise scores.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Experimental design and Statistics. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Correcting misreadings
  • Promising only what a camera-ready can deliver
  • Staying anonymous and within the length limit
  • Giving the online reviewer discussion reasons to raise scores

Example prompts

  • “/hri-author-response”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Hri Author Response loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 95 tokens; SKILL.md has 696 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~95
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 696 words, ~1,416 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/hri-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
hri-author-response
description
Use when writing the single ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper rebuttal that responds to three external reviewers and two area chairs — triaging study-design and statistics critiques, correcting misreadings, promising only what a camera-ready can deliver, staying anonymous and within the length limit, and giving the online reviewer discussion reasons to raise scores.

HRI Author Response (Rebuttal)

HRI gives you one rebuttal, and it matters: because reviewers discuss and can revise scores after it, a focused rebuttal routinely changes decisions. But it is a conference rebuttal, not a journal revise-and-resubmit — you cannot run a new study before the deadline, and there is no in-cycle major-revision round. The job is to make the reviewers who read your paper feel their concerns were heard and, where they are genuinely wrong, corrected. Timing for the HRI 2026 cycle: rebuttal due ~12 Nov 2025 (see resources/official-source-map.md); confirm the length/format limit in the current instructions (待核实).

Before writing: triage every point

For each concern across the three externals and two ACs, sort into:

  • Misreading — the reviewer misunderstood something already in the paper. Correct it crisply, quoting where it is (section/figure), without blaming the reviewer.
  • Fixable in camera-ready — a clarification, an added analysis you already have, a missing citation, a reframed claim. Promise the specific change and, where possible, give the result now.
  • Real limitation you cannot fix now — a design choice, a sample bound, a construct-validity concern. Acknowledge it honestly, argue why it does not sink the contribution, and scope the claim accordingly. Do not pretend it away.

Then rank by decisiveness: which concern, if resolved, actually flips a reviewer or wins the discussion. Spend your limited space there, not on the easy points.

Answer the HRI-typical critiques

HRI reviews cluster on study and interaction issues; have crisp answers ready:

  • "Underpowered / N too small." Report your power basis, effect sizes with CIs already in the paper, and — if applicable — that the observed effect is large enough to matter. Do not promise "we will collect more data" (you cannot before camera-ready); argue the evidence you have.
  • "Confound / demand characteristics." Point to the manipulation check, counterbalancing, or controls already present; if a real confound exists, bound its plausible effect honestly.
  • "Wizard-of-Oz not convincing / undisclosed." Clarify what was autonomous vs. wizard-controlled and the wizard constraints/error logging; if you buried it, promise to foreground it.
  • "Just a liking score, not behavior." Point to any behavioral/task outcome you measured; if the claim overreached the measure, narrow the claim rather than defend the overreach.
  • "Statistics questionable." Address multiple-comparison correction, the confirmatory/exploratory split, and assumption checks; commit to a re-analysis in camera-ready if warranted.
  • "Novelty / positioning." State the delta against the specific prior work cited, without breaking anonymity (third person).
  • "Ethics unclear." Confirm IRB/consent and (anonymized) deception/debriefing details.
Show full SKILL.md (293 more words)Show less

Promise only what the camera-ready can deliver

The rebuttal's currency is credibility. Every promise should be something you can actually do in the final version within the 8-page budget: rephrase a claim, add an already-computed analysis or effect size, foreground a disclosure, add a citation, clarify a figure. Never promise a new study, new data collection, or a result you have not computed — reviewers discount vague promises and remember broken ones.

Structure and constraints

  • Group by concern, not by reviewer, when multiple reviewers raise the same issue — answer it once, well, and note it addresses R1/R3.
  • Lead with the most decisive points; a tight limit means the last third may be skimmed.
  • Be concrete and quantitative: quote the section, give the number, name the exact change.
  • Stay within the length limit and any format rules; over-length rebuttals can be truncated.
  • Stay anonymous — no author/institution names, no identifying links, no "as we showed in [our other paper]" in first person.
  • Professional tone. Thank reviewers briefly, never argue with their competence or tone; give the sympathetic reviewer material to defend you in the discussion.

What not to do

  • Do not concede your central contribution to sound agreeable — if the core claim is sound, defend it.
  • Do not sprawl across every minor point and run out of room for the decisive one.
  • Do not introduce a brand-new claim or result the reviewers had no chance to vet.
  • Do not break anonymity to prove a point.

After the rebuttal

The 1AC opens an online discussion; you will not see it. Your rebuttal is the last input you control before the PC meeting, so make it self-sufficient. If accepted (possibly with shepherding), carry every promise into hri-camera-ready; if rejected, mine the reviews and re-route with hri-topic-selection.

Output format

text
[Triage] concerns sorted: misreading / camera-ready-fixable / real-limitation
[Decisive points] the 2-3 objections the rebuttal must win, per reviewer
[Responses] each: correction or promised change, concrete + quantitative
[Promises] all deliverable in camera-ready within 8 pages? no new-study promises?
[Anonymity + length] third-person, within limit?
[Draft] <the rebuttal, grouped by concern, decisive-first>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in HRI-Skills/skills/hri-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Hri Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Hri Author Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Hri Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Data Scientistmagnus919/hermes-profiles289—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Data Scientistmagnus919/agent-skills119—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Statistical PowerK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~4.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Algo Rank Wilsonasgard-ai-platform/skills242—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Analyze StatsAperivue/medsci-skills333—~7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Data Scientist

    magnus919/hermes-profiles

    PhD-level expertise in data science, statistics, and machine learning.

    289 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Data Scientist

    magnus919/agent-skills

    A skill your agent uses for PhD-level expertise in data science, statistics, and machine learning: rigorous statistical analysis, experimental design, causal inference, advanced modeling, research…

    119 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Statistical Power

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Calculates sample sizes and statistical power for study planning.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Algo Rank Wilson

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Calculate Wilson Score confidence intervals for ranking items by positive proportion with sample size correction.

    242 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Analyze Stats

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when data needs statistical analysis.

    333 GitHub stars~7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Hypothesis Testing Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Statistical hypothesis testing, power analysis, and significance reporting

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Hri Author Response

What does Hri Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when writing the single ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper rebuttal that responds to three external reviewers and two area chairs — triaging study-design and statistics critiques…. Hri Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the single ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper rebuttal that responds to three external reviewers and two area chairs — triaging study-design and statistics critiques, correcting misreadings, promising only what a camera-ready can deliver, staying anonymous and within the length limit, and giving the online reviewer discussion reasons to raise scores.

When should I use Hri Author Response?

Hri Author Response fits situations like: correcting misreadings; promising only what a camera-ready can deliver; staying anonymous and within the length limit; giving the online reviewer discussion reasons to raise scores.

How do I install Hri Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (HRI-Skills/skills/hri-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/hri-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Hri Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (HRI-Skills/skills/hri-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/hri-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Hri Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/hri-author-response, .gemini/skills/hri-author-response, .github/skills/hri-author-response and .opencode/skills/hri-author-response in your project.

What does Hri Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Hri Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Hri Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Hri Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Hri Author Response use?

Hri Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Hri Author Response use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Hri Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Hri Author Response: Data Scientist (magnus919/hermes-profiles, 289 stars), Data Scientist (magnus919/agent-skills, 119 stars), Statistical Power (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars) and Algo Rank Wilson (asgard-ai-platform/skills, 242 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Hri Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.