Agent skill

Hri Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code, robot behaviors, de-identified data, and study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Hri Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hri-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/HRI-Skills/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
hri-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
589 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code, robot behaviors, de-identified data, and study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition…

  • Packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code
  • SKILL.md covers First: does this edition run a…, What an HRI artifact actually…, Make it reusable, within… and Human-subjects constraints on…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Robot behaviors

What it does

Hri Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code, robot behaviors, de-identified data, and study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition offers, while being honest about the limits of reproducing an embodied human-subjects study.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code
  • Robot behaviors
  • De-identified data
  • Study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition offers

Example prompts

  • “/hri-artifact-evaluation”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Hri Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 74 tokens; SKILL.md has 589 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~74
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 589 words, ~1,312 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
hri-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code, robot behaviors, de-identified data, and study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition offers, while being honest about the limits of reproducing an embodied human-subjects study.

HRI Artifact Evaluation

HRI's artifact and reproducibility culture is less formalized than software-engineering venues': there is not a long-standing, uniformly enforced ACM artifact-badge track at every HRI edition, and whether a given year runs a formal reproducibility/artifact evaluation is 待核实 per cycle. So treat artifact work at HRI as a credibility and openness move first, and follow a formal badge process only if this edition offers one. Either way, the artifact of an HRI paper is unusual: it is the study, not a runnable system that reproduces a number. This skill packages it honestly. It builds on hri-reproducibility and the shared kit in ../../resources/code/README.md.

First: does this edition run a formal evaluation?

  • Check the current call for a reproducibility/artifact track, its badges, and its own deadline (待核实). If it exists, follow its instructions exactly.
  • If ACM badges are offered, they follow the ACM scheme (Artifacts Available / Evaluated - Functional / Reusable / Results Reproduced). Map your package to whichever the edition supports.
  • If no formal track runs, still release an open, well-documented artifact — reviewers and readers reward it, and it is the community norm even without a badge.

What an HRI artifact actually contains

Because the core evidence is a human study of an embodied robot, the artifact is rarely a one-command reproduction. Assemble:

  • Study materials — questionnaires (items + scoring), interview guides, task scripts, consent-form summary, and coding schemes.
  • Robot-behavior specification — the conditions/behaviors the robot exhibited: for autonomous behavior, the software version and parameters; for Wizard-of-Oz, the wizard's action space, protocol, and error rates (see hri-experiments).
  • De-identified data — participant-level data with identifiers removed, plus a codebook.
  • Analysis code — scripts that regenerate every reported statistic, figure, and table from the shared data, with pinned dependencies and fixed seeds.
  • Pre-registration pointer and any deviation notes.

Make it reusable, within honest limits

  • Reproducible = re-analyzable + re-runnable-as-a-method. An evaluator should be able to regenerate your results from the shared data and to understand the procedure well enough to run the study again — not to recreate your exact human responses. State this scope plainly.
  • Document the environment. For analysis code, a README with dependency versions and a single entry point; a container helps if the toolchain is heavy.
  • License it (an OSI-approved code license; a documented data-use/consent basis for the data).
  • Archive with a DOI (OSF, Zenodo, figshare, or Software Heritage) rather than a personal homepage, so the link is permanent and citable.
Show full SKILL.md (196 more words)Show less

Human-subjects constraints on the artifact

An HRI artifact contains people, which limits what can be shared:

  • Share only data/media the participants consented to share for that use; if consent for public data or video was not obtained, share what you can and explain the gap honestly.
  • De-identify thoroughly — free-text responses and video are the usual re-identification risks.
  • Vulnerable-population studies (children, older adults, clinical) may permit little sharing; say so rather than force an unethical release.
  • A partial, honest artifact with a clear rationale beats an over-shared one that breaches consent.

Camera-ready badge mechanics (if applicable)

  • Badges, when a paper earns them, are displayed on the published version — coordinate with hri-camera-ready so any badge and the archive DOI appear correctly.
  • Keep the anonymized review-time archive and the de-anonymized public archive separate; the public one carries author names, the review one must not.

Anti-patterns

  • Overclaiming a "reproducible" human study as if it re-runs like a benchmark.
  • "Data available on request" — treated as unavailable.
  • Unlogged Wizard-of-Oz — the stimulus cannot be reproduced.
  • Identifiable data or video released without consent for that use.
  • Chasing a badge that does not exist this cycle instead of simply releasing a good artifact.

Output format

text
[Formal track?] does this edition run artifact/reproducibility evaluation + badges? (verify)
[Artifact contents] materials · robot-behavior spec (incl. WoZ) · de-identified data + codebook · analysis code
[Reproducibility scope] re-analysis + method replication; human responses framed as not re-runnable
[Openness] DOI archive · license · honest statement of consent-limited gaps
[Human-subjects] de-identified · shared only what consent allows
[Badge readiness] (if offered) which ACM badge(s) targeted · public vs review archive separated
[Fix queue] <ordered>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in HRI-Skills/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Hri Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Hri Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Hri Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Ase Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sigcomm Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Socc Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ase Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when preparing an accepted ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper's tool and data for the Artifact Evaluation track, targeting the ACM Artifacts Available and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SIGCOMM paper's code, traces, topologies, and configuration for the artifact-evaluation committee — choosing ACM badges (Artifacts Available, Evaluated…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SIGMETRICS artifact for the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme (Artifacts Available, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced)…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Socc Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ACM SoCC artifact for the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme (Artifacts Available, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced), covering what…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mobisys Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Hri Artifact Evaluation

What does Hri Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code, robot behaviors, de-identified data, and study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition…. Hri Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code, robot behaviors, de-identified data, and study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition offers, while being honest about the limits of reproducing an embodied human-subjects study.

When should I use Hri Artifact Evaluation?

Hri Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: packaging the artifacts of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — code; robot behaviors; de-identified data; study materials — for openness and any ACM badges the edition offers.

How do I install Hri Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (HRI-Skills/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Hri Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (HRI-Skills/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Hri Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/hri-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Hri Artifact Evaluation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Hri Artifact Evaluation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Hri Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Hri Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Hri Artifact Evaluation use?

Hri Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Hri Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Hri Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Hri Artifact Evaluation: Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Ase Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Hri Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.