Read arXiv Paper
karpathy/nanochat
Fetches the TeX source of an arXiv paper from its URL, reads it and writes a markdown summary tied to the nanochat project.
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process, what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means, champion dynamics at the program-committee…
Install Hpca Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hpca-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process .claude/skills/hpca-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "hpca-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process into .claude/skills/hpca-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hpca-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hpca-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process .agents/skills/hpca-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "hpca-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process into .agents/skills/hpca-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hpca-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hpca-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process .cursor/skills/hpca-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "hpca-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process into .cursor/skills/hpca-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hpca-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hpca-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process .gemini/skills/hpca-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "hpca-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process into .gemini/skills/hpca-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hpca-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hpca-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process .github/skills/hpca-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "hpca-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process into .github/skills/hpca-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hpca-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills hpca-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process .opencode/skills/hpca-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "hpca-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process into .opencode/skills/hpca-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "hpca-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
hpca-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~950 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 431 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process, what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means, champion dynamics at the program-committee…
- Reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process
- SKILL.md covers The pipeline, What the single window means, Champion dynamics at the PC… and Read reviews for the deciding…, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- What a single combined rebuttal/revision window means
What it does
Hpca Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process, what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means, champion dynamics at the program-committee meeting, how to read each outcome, and how confidentiality and the preprint policy shape expectations.
Its SKILL.md is about 950 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Academic paper search. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process
- What a single combined rebuttal/revision window means
- Champion dynamics at the program-committee meeting
- How to read each outcome
Example prompts
- “/hpca-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Hpca Review Process loads about 950 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 74 tokens; SKILL.md has 431 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 431 words, ~950 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/hpca-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- hpca-review-process
- description
- Use when reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process, what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means, champion dynamics at the program-committee meeting, how to read each outcome, and how confidentiality and the preprint policy shape expectations.
HPCA Review Process
Use this to set expectations about how HPCA reviews a paper and decides its fate. Understanding the pipeline turns anxiety into a plan: you can predict what the rebuttal/revision window is for and what each outcome signals.
The pipeline
HPCA runs a double-blind review. After the late-July gate, papers are assigned to program-committee reviewers, reviews are written through the autumn, and — in recent cycles — authors get a single combined rebuttal/revision window: one period in which you both respond to reviews and may revise the paper, rather than two separate review rounds. Decisions follow a program-committee meeting; HPCA 2027's reported notification is November 6, 2026 (待核实 the exact rebuttal window).
What the single window means
Unlike venues with two review rounds, HPCA's combined window compresses "argue" and "change the paper" into one effort. Plan for both at once:
- Reviewers see your response and a revised paper, so a claim you defend in prose should also be reflected in the revision.
- The window is short; the objection ledger and staging shelf (see
hpca-author-responseandhpca-supplementary) must be ready before it opens.
Champion dynamics at the PC meeting
Architecture decisions are made by people in a room (or a call). A paper needs a champion — a reviewer willing to argue for it — and its fate often turns on whether the champion can answer the strongest objection. Write the rebuttal to arm your champion with the room, not only to satisfy the skeptic.
| Outcome | Likely meaning | Your move |
|---|---|---|
| Accept | The champion held; objections were addressable | Camera-ready + artifact evaluation |
| Reject with strong reviews | A fixable but unaddressed methodology or novelty gap | Fix, then retarget MICRO/ISCA/ASPLOS |
| Reject with weak/split reviews | No champion emerged, or scope mismatch | Reframe the contribution, re-route |
| Borderline / conditional | The room was divided | Read every review for the deciding objection |
Show full SKILL.md (131 more words)Show less
Read reviews for the deciding objection
Not all objections weigh equally. Identify the one that decides the paper — usually a methodology or novelty concern the champion must overcome — and prioritize it over easy-to-fix surface comments. A rebuttal that answers three minor points and dodges the deciding one loses.
Confidentiality and preprints
Reviews and PC discussion are confidential; do not solicit or reveal reviewer identities, and do not de-anonymize yourself mid-cycle. Recent HPCA guidance asks PC members not to penalize arXiv/CAL preprints, so a preprint is allowed — but posting one that reveals authorship does not change the double-blind obligation on the submission itself.
Expectation-setting pass
[Stage] assigned / reviews out / window / PC decision / notified
[Window plan] response + revision both staged? (Y/N)
[Deciding objection] <the one that decides the paper>
[Champion arming] does the rebuttal give the champion the room? (Y/N)
[Outcome branches] accept / reject-strong / reject-split -> next actionOutput format
[Pipeline position] <where the paper is>
[Rebuttal/revision window] <dates from the current CFP, or unknown>
[Priority objection] <one>
[Outcome-conditional plan] <accept / reject branches>Reopen the current CFP for the exact review calendar and window dates — the pipeline timing is per-edition and was unconfirmed for 2027 at pack time.
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Hpca Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hpca Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~950 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Read arXiv Paperkarpathy/nanochat | 59k | 1 repos | ~494 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Perplexity Web Searchdavila7/claude-code-templates | 33k | 11 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 20 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Openalex Databaseneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 12 repos | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Citation ManagementK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Perplexity Web Search
davila7/claude-code-templates
Runs web-grounded searches through Perplexity's Sonar models over OpenRouter for current events, recent literature and cited facts beyond the model's training cutoff.
Literature Review
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
Openalex Database
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database.
Citation Management
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Finds papers in OpenAlex, PubMed and Google Scholar, turns DOIs, PMIDs and arXiv IDs into clean BibTeX, and validates citations for a manuscript or thesis.
Preprint Search on bioRxiv
LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Hpca Review Process
What does Hpca Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process, what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means, champion dynamics at the program-committee…. Hpca Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process, what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means, champion dynamics at the program-committee meeting, how to read each outcome, and how confidentiality and the preprint policy shape expectations.
When should I use Hpca Review Process?
Hpca Review Process fits situations like: reasoning about the HPCA review pipeline: the double-blind process; what a single combined rebuttal/revision window means; champion dynamics at the program-committee meeting; how to read each outcome.
How do I install Hpca Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/hpca-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Hpca Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/hpca-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Hpca Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/hpca-review-process, .gemini/skills/hpca-review-process, .github/skills/hpca-review-process and .opencode/skills/hpca-review-process in your project.
What does Hpca Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Hpca Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Hpca Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Hpca Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Hpca Review Process use?
Hpca Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Hpca Review Process use?
About 950 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Hpca Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Hpca Review Process: Read arXiv Paper (karpathy/nanochat, 59k stars), Perplexity Web Search (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Openalex Database (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Hpca Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.