Arize Evaluator
github/awesome-copilot
Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…
A skill your agent uses to understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, the role of…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Gec Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills gec-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process .claude/skills/gec-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "gec-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process into .claude/skills/gec-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gec-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills gec-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process .agents/skills/gec-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "gec-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process into .agents/skills/gec-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gec-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills gec-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process .cursor/skills/gec-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "gec-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process into .cursor/skills/gec-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gec-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills gec-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process .gemini/skills/gec-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "gec-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process into .gemini/skills/gec-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gec-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills gec-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process .github/skills/gec-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "gec-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process into .github/skills/gec-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gec-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills gec-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process .opencode/skills/gec-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "gec-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process into .opencode/skills/gec-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gec-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
gec-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~829 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 314 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses to understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, the role of…
- Works in 4 steps: Double-anonymized. Reviewers do not know… → Editorial screening first. Editors… → External review. Suitable submissions… → …
- Understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How GEC review works (verified…, Shape the paper to pass and Anti-patterns, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Gec Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use to understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, the role of multiple external reviewers, and the decision categories. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Its SKILL.md is about 830 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review
- Editorial screening for scope and social-science fit
- The role of multiple external reviewers
- The decision categories
Example prompts
- “/gec-review-process”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Double-anonymized. Reviewers do not know the authors and authors do not know reviewers; submit a
- Editorial screening first. Editors assess fit with the human-and-policy-dimensions scope,
- External review. Suitable submissions are typically sent to a minimum of two reviewers for
- Appeals. A formal appeal can be submitted if it meets Elsevier's appeal-policy requirements; only
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Gec Review Process loads about 829 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 314 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 314 words, ~829 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/gec-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- gec-review-process
- description
- Use to understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, the role of multiple external reviewers, and the decision categories. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Review Process (gec-review-process)
Knowing how GEC screens and decides lets you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. GEC uses double-anonymized review and screens first for scope and social-science fit — the most common avoidable rejection is a paper without a genuine human-dimensions contribution. Process facts were refreshed from the official Guide for Authors on 2026-06-20.
When to trigger
- Before submitting, to stress-test against editorial-screening grounds
- Interpreting a decision letter and setting expectations
- Understanding what interdisciplinary reviewers are likely to weigh
- Deciding whether the social-science contribution is strong enough to clear the desk
How GEC review works (verified 2026-06-20; re-confirm volatile items)
- Double-anonymized. Reviewers do not know the authors and authors do not know reviewers; submit a
separate title page and anonymized manuscript (see
gec-submission). - Editorial screening first. Editors assess fit with the human-and-policy-dimensions scope, the presence of a significant social-science component, sufficient significance, and adequate engagement with the relevant literatures. Out-of-scope or natural-science-only papers are screened out.
- External review. Suitable submissions are typically sent to a minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment, usually with interdisciplinary coverage.
- Appeals. A formal appeal can be submitted if it meets Elsevier's appeal-policy requirements; only one appeal per submission is considered, and the appeal decision is final.
Shape the paper to pass
- Make the human/policy contribution and scope fit explicit (avoids the most common screen-out).
- Engage the relevant interdisciplinary literatures (a single-silo paper invites a fit objection).
- Anticipate reviewers from different disciplines — define terms, justify methods on their own terms.
- Clear ethics/IRB and human-subjects compliance and the data statement up front.
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a natural-science / biophysical paper with no social-science contribution (scope screen-out)
- Ignoring an obvious related literature on the human-dimensions or domain side
- Assuming a single-discipline framing will satisfy interdisciplinary reviewers
- Expecting a fast turnaround; plan for a multi-month review
Output format
【Scope / fit check】human-dimensions + policy relevance clear? [Y/N]
【Social-science component】significant and central? [Y/N]
【Literature engaged】interdisciplinary? [Y/N]
【Review model】double-anonymized — manuscript anonymized? [Y/N]
【Realistic outcome】reject / major revision / minor revision
【Next】gec-submission (or gec-revision-and-rebuttal if decided)Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— peer-review model, reviewer count, appeals, and scope notes
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Gec Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gec Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~829 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot | 40k | 1 repos | ~8.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| LLM Evaluationdavila7/claude-code-templates | 33k | 12 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Agent Evaluationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| EvaluatorsArize-ai/phoenix | 12k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Agent Evaluation Reportingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
LLM Evaluation
davila7/claude-code-templates
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
Agent Evaluation
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers.
Evaluators
Arize-ai/phoenix
Author or refine a Phoenix evaluator — code or LLM-as-a-judge — that scores a run's output.
Agent Evaluation Reporting
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
A skill your agent uses when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.
- Official
Creating Online Evaluations
PostHog/posthog
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Gec Review Process
What does Gec Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses to understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, the role of…. Gec Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use to understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, the role of multiple external reviewers, and the decision categories.
When should I use Gec Review Process?
Gec Review Process fits situations like: understand how Global Environmental Change (GEC) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review; editorial screening for scope and social-science fit; the role of multiple external reviewers; the decision categories.
How do I install Gec Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/gec-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Gec Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/gec-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Gec Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/gec-review-process, .gemini/skills/gec-review-process, .github/skills/gec-review-process and .opencode/skills/gec-review-process in your project.
What does Gec Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Gec Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Gec Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Gec Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Gec Review Process use?
Gec Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Gec Review Process use?
About 829 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Gec Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Gec Review Process: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), LLM Evaluation (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars), Agent Evaluation (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and Evaluators (Arize-ai/phoenix, 12k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Gec Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.