A skill your agent uses when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Facct Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-writing-style .claude/skills/facct-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
facct-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
652 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool…

  • Claims are scoped to who is affected
  • SKILL.md covers Revision rules, The FAccT paper skeleton, Sentence-level rewrites and Limitations-and-harm discipline, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Limitations and harms are argued rather than recited

What it does

Facct Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool, claims are scoped to who is affected, limitations and harms are argued rather than recited, the interdisciplinary framing is native, and the acmart page budget and endmatter statements are used well.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Claims are scoped to who is affected
  • Limitations and harms are argued rather than recited
  • The interdisciplinary framing is native
  • The acmart page budget and endmatter statements are used well

Example prompts

  • “/facct-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Facct Writing Style loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 98 tokens; SKILL.md has 652 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~98
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 652 words, ~1,470 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/facct-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
facct-writing-style
description
Use when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool, claims are scoped to who is affected, limitations and harms are argued rather than recited, the interdisciplinary framing is native, and the acmart page budget and endmatter statements are used well.

FAccT Writing Style

Use this when revising the main paper. FAccT papers are read by a deliberately mixed panel — a computer scientist, a lawyer, and a qualitative social scientist may each land on your paper — so the writing must make a fairness, accountability, or transparency contribution legible to all three and must be honest about who is affected and how. The failure this skill prevents is a paper that is excellent inside one discipline and illegible or naive to the others.

Revision rules

  • Lead with the FAccT contribution. The first page names the socio-technical problem, who bears the harm or holds the accountability, why the current state is inadequate, the contribution (method, audit, framework, critique, study, or legal analysis), and what changes for people — before any model or doctrinal detail.
  • Scope claims to a population, not the world. "Reduces bias" is not a FAccT claim; "reduces the false-positive-rate gap between groups A and B on dataset D, under measure M" is. Name the subgroups, the fairness/transparency construct, and the operationalization.
  • Argue limitations and adverse impacts; do not recite them. State the harms, failure modes, and who could be hurt if the work is deployed or misread — and what you did about each. A boilerplate "limitations" paragraph is a tell that the author has not stressed their own claims. This is also where the Adverse Impacts endmatter statement earns its keep.
  • Make the interdisciplinarity native. If you borrow a construct from law or the social sciences, use it the way that field uses it, cite its real origin, and carry it through the analysis — not as a one-line garnish.
  • Respect the acmart page budget as a design constraint. FAccT 2026 allows up to 14 content pages (+1 endmatter page; 15 if Revised/accepted), references unlimited — generous but finite. A paper that only fits by shrinking its limitations or method is over-scoped.
  • Preserve mutual anonymity in self-citations, system names, acknowledgements, funding, and — critically — keep the Positionality statement out of the anonymous submission entirely.
Show full SKILL.md (322 more words)Show less

The FAccT paper skeleton

SectionJob it must doCommon failure
IntroSociotechnical problem, who is affected, contribution, what changes — first pageLeads with a model/benchmark, not a harm or accountability question
Background / motivationWhy this matters now, grounded across the relevant disciplinesMotivation by assertion; one-discipline framing
Approach / method / argumentThe technique, study design + protocol, or the conceptual/legal argumentMethod too thin to re-run, or critique with no engagement with the artifact
Findings / evaluationDisaggregated results, coded themes, or a defended argumentAggregate-only numbers that hide subgroup harm
Limitations & adverse impactsThe harms and threats that actually bite, each boundedGeneric list untethered from this work
Related workCross-disciplinary, delta-first positioningCites only one lane; misses the obvious neighbor in another field

Sentence-level rewrites

Draft patternFAccT-safe rewrite
"Our method is fair.""our method equalizes <metric> across <groups> on <dataset>, within <bound>; residual gaps in §5"
"We improve transparency.""we surface <what> to <whom> for <decision>, and we test whether they can act on it"
"The model is accurate on a large dataset.""accuracy disaggregated by <subgroup> (Table 2); the largest error falls on <group>"
"This raises ethical concerns.""this risks <specific harm> to <specific population>; we mitigate by <action>, residual risk in the Adverse Impacts statement"
"Prior work is limited.""<work> measured X but not the deployment outcome Y that governs harm; we measure Y"

Limitations-and-harm discipline

text
[Construct]     does the fairness/transparency metric mean what you claim for the affected group?
[Population]    which groups are in and out of scope; who is invisible in your data?
[Deployment]    what goes wrong if this ships or is cited as license to deploy? who is hurt?
[Reflexivity]   whose standpoint shaped the framing? (state it in Positionality upon acceptance)
-> for each that bites: state it, then state the mitigation, next to the affected result

Vignette: compressing an audit paper

A draft auditing a commercial system, with aggregate accuracy up front and a short ethics paragraph at the end: move the disaggregated subgroup results to the first result table, put the worst-affected group in the abstract, argue the construct-validity threat (does your proxy for the protected attribute mean what you claim?) beside that table, and move method minutiae to supplementary. The test of a good cut: a mixed reviewer can answer "who is harmed, by how much, and how sure are we?" from the body alone.

Output format

text
[Writing diagnosis] clear / under-motivated / over-claimed / single-discipline / harm-blind / over-scoped
[First-page fix] <new framing leading with the FAccT contribution and who is affected>
[Claim audit] <claim -> population + construct + operationalization -> scoped? yes/no>
[Harm fix] <adverse impact that bites -> mitigation to add, placed by the result>
[Anonymity edits] <system names / self-citations / positionality kept out of the anonymous PDF>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Facct Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Facct Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Facct Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Facct Writing Style

What does Facct Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool…. Facct Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising an ACM FAccT paper so that a fairness/accountability/transparency contribution is legible on the first page to a mixed CS+law+social-science reviewer pool, claims are scoped to who is affected, limitations and harms are argued rather than recited, the interdisciplinary framing is native, and the acmart page budget and endmatter statements are used well.

When should I use Facct Writing Style?

Facct Writing Style fits situations like: claims are scoped to who is affected; limitations and harms are argued rather than recited; the interdisciplinary framing is native; the acmart page budget and endmatter statements are used well.

How do I install Facct Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/facct-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Facct Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/facct-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Facct Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/facct-writing-style, .gemini/skills/facct-writing-style, .github/skills/facct-writing-style and .opencode/skills/facct-writing-style in your project.

What does Facct Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Facct Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Facct Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Facct Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Facct Writing Style use?

Facct Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Facct Writing Style use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Facct Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Facct Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Facct Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.