Short
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Rewrite the previous response more briefly while preserving the substance.
A skill your agent uses when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Facct Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response .claude/skills/facct-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "facct-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response into .claude/skills/facct-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "facct-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response .agents/skills/facct-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "facct-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response into .agents/skills/facct-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "facct-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response .cursor/skills/facct-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "facct-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response into .cursor/skills/facct-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "facct-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response .gemini/skills/facct-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "facct-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response into .gemini/skills/facct-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "facct-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response .github/skills/facct-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "facct-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response into .github/skills/facct-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "facct-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills facct-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response .opencode/skills/facct-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "facct-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response into .opencode/skills/facct-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "facct-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
facct-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 571 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the…
- Drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews
- SKILL.md covers Triage (both turns), Turn 1 — the short rebuttal, Turn 2 — the… and Reviewer pushback patterns, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Distinctively for the 2026-new process
What it does
Facct Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel, map each to a concrete change, and survive a re-review while keeping mutual anonymity.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews
- Distinctively for the 2026-new process
- The Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel
- Map each to a concrete change
Example prompts
- “/facct-author-response”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Facct Author Response loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 97 tokens; SKILL.md has 571 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 571 words, ~1,329 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/facct-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- facct-author-response
- description
- Use when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel, map each to a concrete change, and survive a re-review while keeping mutual anonymity.
FAccT Author Response
Use this after FAccT reviews are released. FAccT has two distinct speaking turns, and conflating them is a common mistake: a short rebuttal for factual corrections, and — if you receive a Revise decision (new for the 2026 edition) — a full revision plus response that addresses Area-Chair-prioritized concerns and is re-reviewed. Both must respect mutual anonymity: nothing you write may reveal authors, institutions, field sites, or a repository owner.
Triage (both turns)
- Answer what affects the decision: relevance and framing, correctness, depth of exposition, honest treatment of strengths and limitations, and — often decisive at FAccT — the reality of the harm and the care taken with affected people.
- Answer each reviewer on the axis they raised, including the out-of-field reviewer. A legal or qualitative objection is not noise to be waved off with a metric.
- Correct factual misreadings first; a reviewer who misread a subgroup table or a consent procedure is often persuadable.
- Keep every word anonymous — do not name your system's real name, your institution, your field site, your IRB, or a private repository, even to strengthen a point.
Turn 1 — the short rebuttal
Short and strictly for factual corrections and misunderstandings, plus signposting minor edits. It is not a venue to re-argue substantive disagreement or to promise a new study — that is the Revise round's job. Concede what is true, correct what is misread, and point to exactly where the answer already lives in the submitted paper or supplementary material. Do not paste new results the reviewers cannot verify in the current PDF.
Turn 2 — the Revise-and-resubmit response (the distinctive FAccT-2026 move)
A Revise is a genuine revise-and-resubmit. The Area Chair summarizes and prioritizes the concerns; your job is to address that prioritized list. The response is a change ledger: for every prioritized concern, either make the change and show it, or decline it with a reason.
[AC.1] Prioritized concern (quoted briefly)
-> Action: DONE | added disaggregation by <group> (Table 3); reported the utility cost
-> Where: §5.2, Table 3; analysis/rq2.ipynb (anonymized)
[AC.2] Prioritized concern (from the legal reviewer)
-> Action: DONE | corrected the doctrinal framing per §2; the "right" is now cited to <origin>
[AC.3] Prioritized concern
-> Action: DECLINED (with reason) | the requested field study cannot be run in the window
without re-consenting participants; added a bounded limitation instead (§6) and an
Adverse Impacts noteThe rule that turns a Revise into an acceptance: no unaddressed prioritized concern. A concern that is neither done nor explicitly and reasonably declined is what the re-review punishes.
Show full SKILL.md (232 more words)Show less
Reviewer pushback patterns
| Pushback | What it signals | FAccT-ready response |
|---|---|---|
| "Results are aggregate; where is the subgroup harm?" | Disaggregation gap | Add per-group metrics with uncertainty; report the utility trade-off |
| "The proxy for the protected attribute is not valid" | Construct-validity doubt | Validate the proxy, report its error, bound the claim |
| "You speak for a community you did not study" | Standpoint/rigor objection | Add the community's data or scope the claim; note it in Positionality (at acceptance) |
| "The legal claim misreads the doctrine" | Cross-lane correctness | Fix the framing, cite the doctrine correctly, or narrow the legal claim |
| "This could be misused to justify deployment" | Adverse-impact concern | Strengthen the Adverse Impacts statement and the paper's caveats |
Anonymity in the response (easy to slip)
- Refer to your own prior work in the third person, as in the paper.
- Describe changes to released code/data without linking to an identity-revealing repository; use the anonymized location.
- Do not thank a named collaborator, partner organization, or funder inside the response, and do not reveal the field site.
Calibration
- Respond to the criterion the reviewer actually raised, not the one you would rather defend.
- The rebuttal is short and factual; the substantive work is the Revise round — do not burn the rebuttal trying to do the revision's job.
- Length and format norms for both turns, and the very existence of the Revise round, are 2026-new — confirm the current instructions before sending.
Output format
[Turn] short rebuttal / revise-and-resubmit response
[Priority issue] <reviewer or AC concern>
[Decision dimension] relevance / correctness / depth / strengths-and-limits / harm-and-ethics / discipline
[Change ledger] <prioritized concern -> DONE/PARTIAL/DECLINED + where in paper/artifact>
[Anonymity check] <no identity leak, no field-site/positionality reveal: passed/issues>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Facct Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facct Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Shortsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~281 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Fast Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Icassp Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Pldi Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~971 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
Icassp Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already…
Pldi Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting a PLDI author response inside the short February window — triaging reviewer objections about soundness, baselines, and benchmark validity, correcting factual…
Pods Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting ACM PODS author responses, covering the short ~48-hour double-anonymous rebuttal that corrects misreadings of proofs and definitions, and — distinctively — the…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Facct Author Response
What does Facct Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the…. Facct Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel, map each to a concrete change, and survive a re-review while keeping mutual anonymity.
When should I use Facct Author Response?
Facct Author Response fits situations like: drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews; distinctively for the 2026-new process; the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel; map each to a concrete change.
How do I install Facct Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/facct-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Facct Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/facct-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Facct Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/facct-author-response, .gemini/skills/facct-author-response, .github/skills/facct-author-response and .opencode/skills/facct-author-response in your project.
What does Facct Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Facct Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Facct Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Facct Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Facct Author Response use?
Facct Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Facct Author Response use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Facct Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Facct Author Response: Short (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Fast Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Icassp Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Facct Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.