A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Eursr Theory Building

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-theory-building -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-theory-building --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-theory-building .claude/skills/eursr-theory-building && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
eursr-theory-building
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
605 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro…

  • Works in 4 steps: Concept. Define the key construct (the… → Mechanism. The social process generating… → Hypotheses. Derive directional, testable… → …
  • Longitudinal quantitative work
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Build the argument, The macro–micro template… and The "portability" test…, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Eursr Theory Building is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro (institution → individual outcome) account suited to comparative or longitudinal quantitative work. ESR rewards a mechanism that travels over a coefficient bound to one country or wave. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Longitudinal quantitative work

Example prompts

  • “/eursr-theory-building”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Concept. Define the key construct (the form of inequality, mobility, integration, the attitude)
  2. Mechanism. The social process generating the pattern — who acts, why, under what structural or
  3. Hypotheses. Derive directional, testable predictions before the analysis — including
  4. Scope conditions. The contexts, populations, periods, and institutional regimes where the

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Eursr Theory Building loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 107 tokens; SKILL.md has 605 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~107
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 605 words, ~1,616 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/eursr-theory-building/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
eursr-theory-building
description
Use when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro (institution → individual outcome) account suited to comparative or longitudinal quantitative work. ESR rewards a mechanism that travels over a coefficient bound to one country or wave. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Theory & Argument Building (eursr-theory-building)

At ESR a finding becomes a contribution when it is attached to an explicit mechanism that other sociologists can use and stated as testable hypotheses the design can adjudicate. ESR's house form is often a macro–micro argument: how an institutional or contextual feature shapes an individual-level social process. This skill turns data into theory.

When to trigger

  • The models are strong but the "so what / why" is thin
  • A reviewer said the paper is "atheoretical," "variable-driven," or "hypotheses tacked on"
  • You need to state the mechanism, the hypotheses, and the scope conditions
  • Reconciling a cross-national pattern with an individual-level explanation

Build the argument

  1. Concept. Define the key construct (the form of inequality, mobility, integration, the attitude) and distinguish it from neighbors; say how it is measured in principle.
  2. Mechanism. The social process generating the pattern — who acts, why, under what structural or institutional conditions. Make the macro–micro link explicit (how context C changes the individual calculus or constraint).
  3. Hypotheses. Derive directional, testable predictions before the analysis — including cross-level interactions (does the country/context feature moderate the individual effect?).
  4. Scope conditions. The contexts, populations, periods, and institutional regimes where the argument holds — essential for a comparative claim.

The macro–micro template (ESR-specific)

State the argument as a chain a reviewer can test:

Context feature (macro)  →  changes individual constraint/incentive (micro)  →  observable outcome
e.g., earlier tracking   →  earlier high-stakes choice under uncertainty      →  larger secondary
                            for lower-SES families                              (choice-based) SES gap

The cross-level interaction (macro × micro) is usually the hypothesis that carries an ESR paper — it is what cross-national or panel data can identify and a single cross-section cannot.

The "portability" test (ESR-specific)

Ask: Could a sociologist studying a different institution or country import this mechanism? If yes, you have a contribution. If it only works for your wave or country, generalize the logic or reframe (back to eursr-topic-selection).

What "theoretical contribution" means to an ESR referee

ESR referees grade portability and the macro–micro logic, not local cleverness or model fit alone.

Referee judgmentA passing argument showsA failing argument shows
"Atheoretical / variable-driven"a named mechanism + derived hypothesesa list of significant predictors
"Hypotheses tacked on"predictions stated before the analysishypotheses that restate the results
"Why does context matter?"an explicit macro–micro / cross-level linka country dummy with no mechanism
"Where does it stop?"scope conditions across regimesan unbounded claim
Show full SKILL.md (236 more words)Show less

Worked micro-example (illustrative)

A panel study of unemployment scarring is built from data to a portable claim.

Concept: scarring = a lasting wage/employment penalty from a past unemployment spell, net of selection
Mechanism (macro–micro): generous, activating welfare regimes shorten spells and signal less, so the
  individual scar is smaller where re-employment support is strong
Hypothesis (cross-level): the scarring penalty (micro) is weaker in high-activation regimes (macro)
  → a macro × micro interaction the comparative panel can test
Scope conditions: prime-age workers; regimes with active labor-market policy; pre-/post-crisis
Portability: a scholar of any state-buffered risk (illness, divorce) can import the buffering logic

The data yield a mechanism and a cross-level prediction another comparative subfield can use — the move ESR rewards.

Referee pushback → ESR-specific fix

  • "This is a regression with a story attached." → Derive the hypotheses from the mechanism before the models; show the predictions are not just the estimates restated.
  • "The country variable does no theoretical work." → Replace the dummy with a measured institutional feature and a cross-level interaction the data can identify.
  • "Where does the argument hold?" → Add explicit scope conditions across regimes and periods.

Calibration anchors

  • The cross-level interaction is usually the contribution. ESR's comparative/longitudinal leverage exists to test how context moderates an individual process — make that the headline hypothesis.
  • Theory before tests. State the mechanism and derive hypotheses first; theorizing after the results reads as HARKing to expert referees.
  • State the claim plainly with bounded scope. A mechanism a comparative sociologist can restate in a sentence, with explicit scope conditions, outperforms one buried under model output.

Anti-patterns

  • A finding with no mechanism ("X predicts Y" and stop)
  • Hypotheses that merely restate the coefficients (HARKing)
  • A country/context dummy standing in for a theorized institutional feature
  • Grand claims with no scope conditions
  • Burying the argument under tables — the contribution must be stated plainly

Output format

【Core claim】one sentence
【Mechanism】the macro–micro / causal logic
【Key concept(s)】defined and distinguished
【Hypotheses】directional predictions incl. the cross-level interaction → research-design
【Scope conditions】regimes / periods / populations where it holds
【Portability】who else can use this argument
【Next】eursr-research-design

Supplementary resources

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-theory-building of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Eursr Theory Building next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Eursr Theory Building compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Eursr Theory Building this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill64k—~7.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Eursr Theory Building

What does Eursr Theory Building do?

A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro…. Eursr Theory Building is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when building the theoretical argument of a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript into a portable mechanism with testable hypotheses — typically a macro–micro (institution → individual outcome) account suited to comparative or longitudinal quantitative work.

When should I use Eursr Theory Building?

Eursr Theory Building fits situations like: longitudinal quantitative work.

How do I install Eursr Theory Building in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-theory-building -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-theory-building in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eursr-theory-building in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Eursr Theory Building in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-theory-building -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-theory-building in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eursr-theory-building in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Eursr Theory Building in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-theory-building -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eursr-theory-building, .gemini/skills/eursr-theory-building, .github/skills/eursr-theory-building and .opencode/skills/eursr-theory-building in your project.

What does Eursr Theory Building need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eursr Theory Building is instructions for the agent only.

Does Eursr Theory Building access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Eursr Theory Building safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Eursr Theory Building use?

Eursr Theory Building is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Eursr Theory Building use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Eursr Theory Building?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eursr Theory Building: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Eursr Theory Building?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.