Hypothesis Generation
spacering-net/codeg
Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and…
Install Etp Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process .claude/skills/etp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "etp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process into .claude/skills/etp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "etp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process .agents/skills/etp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "etp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process into .agents/skills/etp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "etp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process .cursor/skills/etp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "etp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process into .cursor/skills/etp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "etp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process .gemini/skills/etp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "etp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process into .gemini/skills/etp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "etp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process .github/skills/etp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "etp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process into .github/skills/etp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "etp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process .opencode/skills/etp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "etp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process into .opencode/skills/etp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "etp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
etp-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 700 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and…
- Calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How ETP review actually runs, Reading the decision letter and Why ETP papers get desk-rejected, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- The developmental double-anonymized review
What it does
Etp Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography. Sets expectations and strategy; it does not draft the response letter (etp-rebuttal).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds
- The developmental double-anonymized review
- Revision choreography
Example prompts
- “/etp-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Etp Review Process loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 76 tokens; SKILL.md has 700 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 700 words, ~1,478 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/etp-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- etp-review-process
- description
- Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography. Sets expectations and strategy; it does not draft the response letter (etp-rebuttal).
Review Process (etp-review-process)
When to trigger
- You just submitted and want to know what to expect and when
- A decision letter arrived and you need to read the signal (reject / major R&R / minor)
- You are deciding whether an R&R is winnable and how much to invest
- You want to understand ETP's developmental review culture before you respond
- You are weighing a resubmission to ETP vs. a reroute to JBV/SEJ/AMJ
How ETP review actually runs
ETP uses double-anonymized peer review through ScholarOne, typically with a handling/associate editor and two to three reviewers. Like its top management/entrepreneurship peers, ETP runs a developmental review model: reviewers and editors aim to help a promising paper become publishable across rounds, so a major R&R is the realistic "good" first outcome for a strong submission — outright first-round acceptance is rare. Expect substantive, theory-heavy reviews and an editor letter that prioritizes among reviewer concerns.
Calibrate volatile specifics (current turnaround times, acceptance rate, editor) on the SAGE journal page and your ScholarOne dashboard (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
Reading the decision letter
| Decision | What it usually means | Your move |
|---|---|---|
| Desk reject | Fit/contribution/anonymization problem before review | Reroute or re-engineer the contribution (etp-topic-selection / etp-contribution-framing) |
| Reject after review | Fixable-in-principle but too far this round | Harvest the reviews; major rebuild before any resubmission |
| Major R&R | The realistic strong outcome — winnable with serious work | Plan a full revision; this is etp-rebuttal territory |
| Minor R&R | Close; targeted fixes | Address precisely; do not reopen settled issues |
| Conditional accept | Almost there | Execute the editor's conditions exactly |
The editor's letter is the master document: it tells you which reviewer concerns are binding. When reviewers conflict, the editor usually signals whose view governs — follow that signal rather than trying to satisfy everyone equally.
Why ETP papers get desk-rejected
- Fit: a strategy/finance/general-management paper with entrepreneurship as mere setting
- Thin theory: a mechanism that "could be about any firm"
- Missing practice mandate: no credible implications-for-practice contribution
- Anonymization failure: author identity leaks, mishandled under double-anonymized review
- Length/format: over the page limit or non-APA, signaling carelessness
Choosing whether to fight for the R&R
An ETP major R&R is worth heavy investment when the editor signals the contribution is valued and the binding concerns are addressable with available data/redesign. It is not worth it when a core reviewer rejects the premise (the mechanism isn't entrepreneurial, the design can't support the claim) and no feasible revision changes that — there, a reroute or rebuild beats a doomed resubmission. The developmental culture means editors expect a serious, responsive revision; a thin response burns the goodwill an R&R represents.
Show full SKILL.md (281 more words)Show less
Checklist
- You have identified the decision type and the editor's binding priorities
- You can name the 2–3 concerns that must be resolved to win the R&R
- You have judged whether the contribution premise survived (if not, reroute)
- You know which reviewer the editor sided with on any conflict
- The revision plan covers theory, evidence, and the practice contribution
- Timeline and feasibility (new data? new analysis?) are realistic
Anti-patterns
- Treating a major R&R as a near-acceptance and revising lightly
- Satisfying all reviewers equally while ignoring the editor's prioritization
- Reopening settled points in a minor R&R
- Fighting an unwinnable R&R when the premise itself was rejected
- Ignoring the practice mandate in the revision because the theory got most reviewer ink
Worked vignette (illustrative)
An author receives a major R&R. The editor's letter says the contribution is "potentially important" but lists two binding concerns: R1 doubts the mechanism is distinctively entrepreneurial, and R2 calls the practice section thin; a third reviewer raises minor measurement points.
Reading the signal: "potentially important" plus a major R&R in ETP's developmental culture means this is a winnable, worth-investing revision, not a near-acceptance — the author should plan a substantial rebuild, not a light pass.
The editor's prioritization is explicit (R1 and R2 are binding; R3 is secondary), so the revision plan leads with re-securing the entrepreneurial mechanism and rewriting the practice section as a real contribution, then mops up R3's measurement points.
If, instead, R1 had rejected the premise outright with the editor concurring ("this is not an entrepreneurship contribution"), no feasible revision would save it and a reroute to JBV or a rebuild would beat a doomed resubmission.
The author hands the prioritized plan to etp-rebuttal.
Output format
【Journal】Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
【Decision type】desk reject / reject / major R&R / minor R&R / conditional
【Editor's binding priorities】top 2-3 concerns the letter foregrounds
【Reviewer conflict】whose view the editor signals governs
【Premise survives?】is the entrepreneurial contribution still alive? Y/N
【Winnability】invest / reroute / rebuild + why
【Revision scope】theory / evidence / practice section
【Next skill】etp-rebuttal© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Etp Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etp Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 14 repos | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow | 84k | 4 repos | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss | 1.9k | 25 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill | 64k | — | ~7.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
GitHub Deep Research
bytedance/deer-flow
Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.
Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
Content Research Writer
weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.
Last30days
mvanhorn/last30days-skill
Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.
Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Etp Review Process
What does Etp Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and…. Etp Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography.
When should I use Etp Review Process?
Etp Review Process fits situations like: calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds; the developmental double-anonymized review; revision choreography.
How do I install Etp Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/etp-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Etp Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/etp-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Etp Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/etp-review-process, .gemini/skills/etp-review-process, .github/skills/etp-review-process and .opencode/skills/etp-review-process in your project.
What does Etp Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Etp Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Etp Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Etp Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Etp Review Process use?
Etp Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Etp Review Process use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Etp Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Etp Review Process: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Etp Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.