A skill your agent uses when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Edbt Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-writing-style .claude/skills/edbt-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
edbt-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
595 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer…

  • Revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page
  • SKILL.md covers Revision rules, Paper-shape skeletons, Sentence-level rewrites and Scope discipline, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • A reproducibly described mechanism

What it does

Edbt Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer, honest scope, and disciplined use of the per-shape page budget (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision) in the OpenProceedings template.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page
  • A reproducibly described mechanism
  • An evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer
  • Disciplined use of the per-shape page budget (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision) in the OpenProceedings template

Example prompts

  • “/edbt-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Edbt Writing Style loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 595 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~84
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 595 words, ~1,397 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/edbt-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
edbt-writing-style
description
Use when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer, honest scope, and disciplined use of the per-shape page budget (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision) in the OpenProceedings template.

EDBT Writing Style

Use this when revising the main paper. EDBT papers are read by database-systems reviewers and published open access on OpenProceedings, so they need a data-management contribution stated on the first page and an evaluation a skeptic trusts. The failure this skill prevents is a technically fine paper that reads like a vague performance claim or a re-skinned ML result with a database title.

Revision rules

  • Lead with the data-management contribution: the concrete problem (a storage, query-processing, indexing, transaction, integration, or data-quality problem), why current systems fall short, the contribution (mechanism and/or study), the evidence on real workloads, and what it enables.
  • Make the mechanism reproducible in prose. Describe the algorithm, data structures, parameters, and system integration precisely enough that a competent reader could reimplement it — vagueness here is the "I cannot tell how it works" revise.
  • Pair every claim with proportional evidence — a real workload, a tuned baseline, a measurement at realistic scale with reported variance — not adjectives like "significantly faster."
  • State scope honestly, in the body. Name where the technique helps, where it is neutral, and its overhead or failure cases; quantify them rather than hiding them. A database reviewer's first two objections are usually "unfair baseline" and "unrealistic scale" — pre-empt both.
  • Respect the per-shape page budget as a design constraint (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis ≤12 pages; Vision ≤6; references unlimited — reverify per cycle). References do not count, but figures, tables, and appendices in the body do.
  • Use the OpenProceedings/host template, not acmart or IEEEtran carried from a US venue.

Paper-shape skeletons

Regular / applied-systems paper

SectionJob it must doCommon failure
IntroProblem, inadequacy, contribution, evidence preview, what it enables — first pageLeads with "data is growing," not a concrete problem
Background / MotivationWhy current systems fall short, groundedMotivation by assertion
Approach / SystemThe mechanism + integration, reproduciblyDescribed too thinly to reimplement
EvaluationEach claim answered on real workloads vs. tuned baselinesUnnamed dataset, untuned baseline, toy scale
Scope / DiscussionWhere it helps, is neutral, or costs; quantifiedLimits hidden or hand-waved
Related workDelta-first positioning against DB venuesCitation catalog with no contrast

Experiments & Analysis paper — the study is the contribution: foreground the methodology (subjects, metrics, fairness, coverage, repeatability) and treat the findings as the deliverable, not a new system.

Vision paper — a tight argument for a new direction: the problem, why now, the sketch of an approach, and the research agenda, within the short budget; no need for a full evaluation, but the argument must be disciplined.

Show full SKILL.md (182 more words)Show less

Sentence-level rewrites

Draft patternEDBT-safe rewrite
"Our system is significantly faster.""reduces median query latency by X% (variance over N runs) vs. <tuned baseline> on <workload>"
"We evaluate on a large dataset.""We evaluate on <named workload/logs>, sizes ..., cluster of ... workers; config in the artifact"
"Results show our approach works well.""Under skew, straggler time drops by ...; on uniform keys, overhead is ...% (Table 2)"
"State-of-the-art performance."Claim scoped to the workloads, metrics, and scale actually tested
"Our method scales.""throughput holds from 8 to 128 workers (Fig. 2); beyond that is untested"

Scope discipline

text
[Where it helps]     name the regime (e.g. concentrated, detectable skew) and show it
[Where it is neutral] show the no-op case (e.g. uniform keys) so the reviewer trusts you
[What it costs]      quantify overhead / memory / setup, not "negligible"
[Where it fails]     state the boundary (e.g. very short queries) and measure it
-> put each of these next to the affected result, not in a deferred paragraph

Vignette: compressing an over-scoped systems paper

A draft with a sprawling background, five contributions, and nine plots: keep the two contributions the evaluation actually supports, the plots that carry the headline result and the overhead case, and a tight scope subsection; move parameter sweeps and secondary configurations to the artifact with explicit forward references. The test of a good cut: a reviewer should be able to answer "what does it do, on what workloads, versus what baseline, and what does it cost?" from the body alone.

Output format

text
[Writing diagnosis] clear / under-motivated / over-claimed / evidence-mismatched / over-scoped
[Shape] Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision — budget respected?
[First-page fix] <new framing leading with the data-management contribution>
[Claim audit] <claim -> workload/baseline/scale -> where answered -> proportional? yes/no>
[Scope fix] <where-it-helps / neutral / cost / failure, placed by the result>
[Template] host/OpenProceedings template in use? yes/no

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Edbt Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Edbt Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Edbt Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Avoid AI Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing4.9k3 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
BrandOhh-889/skyroc79513 repos~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Khazix WeChat Article WriterKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Writing Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills32k7 repos~309Automated safety check: PassNone
Unslop AI Writing Cleanuptheclaymethod/unslop518—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Avoid AI Writing

    conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

    Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").

    4.9k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~8.1k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Brand

    Ohh-889/skyroc

    Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency.

    795 GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~733 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Khazix WeChat Article Writer

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Writes long-form WeChat official account articles in the personal style of the Khazix account, from briefs, links, PDFs or rough notes, with a topic quality check.

    21k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writing Guidelines

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. An agent skill from vercel-labs/agent-skills.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~309 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Unslop AI Writing Cleanup

    theclaymethod/unslop

    Removes AI writing tells from prose through an audit-first flow, routing to a two-pass rewrite, a report-only cleanup, voice teaching or mimicry depending on the sub-command used.

    518 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • UX Writing

    content-designer/ux-writing-skill

    Applies UX writing practice to interface copy such as buttons, errors, forms and onboarding, using four quality standards and accessibility guidance.

    224 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.8k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Edbt Writing Style

What does Edbt Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer…. Edbt Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer, honest scope, and disciplined use of the per-shape page budget (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision) in the OpenProceedings template.

When should I use Edbt Writing Style?

Edbt Writing Style fits situations like: revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page; A reproducibly described mechanism; an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer; disciplined use of the per-shape page budget (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision) in the OpenProceedings template.

How do I install Edbt Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/edbt-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Edbt Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/edbt-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Edbt Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/edbt-writing-style, .gemini/skills/edbt-writing-style, .github/skills/edbt-writing-style and .opencode/skills/edbt-writing-style in your project.

What does Edbt Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Edbt Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Edbt Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Edbt Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Edbt Writing Style use?

Edbt Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Edbt Writing Style use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Edbt Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Edbt Writing Style: Avoid AI Writing (conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, 4.9k stars), Brand (Ohh-889/skyroc, 795 stars), Khazix WeChat Article Writer (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars) and Writing Guidelines (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Edbt Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.